Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology / 2021 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6665697 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6665697

Anna Socha-Banasiak, Patrycja Sputa-Grzegrzółka, Jędrzej Grzegrzółka, Krzysztof Pacześ, Piotr Dzięgiel, Beata Sordyl, Hanna Romanowicz, Elżbieta Czkwianianc, "Metallothioneins in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Importance in Pathogenesis and Potential Therapy Target", Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 2021, Article ID 6665697, 9 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6665697

Metallothioneins in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Importance in Pathogenesis and Potential Therapy Target

Academic Editor: Yu-Chen Fan
Received08 Oct 2020
Revised10 Apr 2021
Accepted16 Apr 2021
Published26 Apr 2021

Abstract

Immunological disorders, increased oxidative stress, and damage to the epithelial barrier play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). In the treatment of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), it is increasingly common to use biological drugs that selectively affect individual components of the inflammatory cascade. However, administering the medicines currently available does not always result in obtaining and maintaining remission, and it may also lead to the development of resistance to a given agent over time. Metallothioneins (MTs) belong to the group of low molecular weight proteins, which, among others, regulate the inflammation and homeostasis of heavy metals as well as participating in the regulation of the intensity of oxidative stress. The results of the studies conducted so far do not clearly indicate the role of MTs in the process of inflammation in patients with IBD. However, there are reports that suggest the possibility of using MTs as a potential target in the treatment of this group of patients.

1. Introduction

According to the current state of knowledge, it is assumed that the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) is multifactorial. In the literature, there is an emphasis on the role of genetic predisposition, immune system disorders, environmental factors (including the type of delivery, the diet, and the exposure to tobacco smoke), modification of the composition of the intestinal microbiome, and abnormalities of the local immune response to commensal microbiota [14]. In patients with any form of IBD, local inflammatory infiltration is observed, accompanied by damage to the epithelial barrier, increased secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, increased oxidative stress, and disturbed apoptosis. One of the key proinflammatory cytokines associated with the development of IBD is TNFα, released mainly by monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes [5]. The increase in local TNFα synthesis goes along with a cascade of immune phenomena related to the excessive secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, and IFN), and a decrease in the synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10). This is also accompanied by the activation of other signaling pathways involving a Th17 response [6, 7]. In the case of Crohn’s disease (CD), inflammation is mainly related to the activation of Th1 cells and increased production of IFNɣ and TNFα. Th1 cell stimulation is promoted by IL-12, IL-23, IL-15, IL-18, and IL-21. In ulcerative colitis (UC), the mechanism of the inflammatory response is less understood, but it is associated with, for instance, an impaired humoral response and an excessive production of IL-13, among others [8]. Metallothioneins (MTs) also participate in the inflammation pathophysiology in IBD patients. However, their role in regulating the inflammatory process in this group of patients has not been clearly established [9].

Currently, the aim of IBD therapy is to stop disease progression, eliminate the active inflammatory process, achieve regeneration, and maintain a proper function of the gastrointestinal mucosa [1]. IBD conservative treatment includes 5-ASA preparations, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressants (thiopurines, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus), as well as an increasingly broad spectrum of biological drugs. The latter include monoclonal antibodies directed against TNFα (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab), integrins (vedolizumab, natalizumab), interleukins IL-12 and IL-23 (ustekinumab), and Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib) [10]. At present, it seems beneficial to include immunomodulatory drugs, including biological agents, early into the treatment, which increases the chance of regression of the inflammatory lesions and of changing the natural course of the disease [1114]. However, the aforementioned multifactorial pathogenesis, still not fully understood, often makes it difficult to choose the optimal treatment for a given patient [15]. Moreover, therapy with biological drugs is not always effective, which is confirmed by the results of studies that show that about 20% of patients do not respond to the administration of anti-TNFα preparations [16]. It should also be mentioned that long-term immunosuppressive treatment is associated with numerous side effects [17, 18]. Therefore, it is extremely important to search for new diagnostic methods and treatment options based on a thorough understanding of the processes that regulate the development of IBD, including impaired functions of the immune system and microbiota composition [19]. Investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying IBD and correlating them with clinical experiments may result in innovative methods of treating these chronic gastrointestinal diseases—so far incurable and constantly increasing in frequency.

2. Metallothioneins and Their Role in the Regulation of Inflammation

MTs, described in 1957 by Margoshes and Vallee, belong to the group of low molecular weight proteins (6–8 kDa), commonly found in the plant and animal kingdoms. Their presence was first found in the horse kidney cortex. Cysteine, a sulfur-containing amino acid, is the main building block of MTs. This ensures MTs a wealth of sulfhydryl groups (-SH) and metal ion binding [2022]. MT isoforms isolated from various tissues differ slightly in their amino acid composition. The structure of MTs consists of alpha domains, four Cd ions, and beta domains, binding three metal ions: two Zn ions and one Cd ion. The alpha and beta domains are bound by a lysine dimer [23]. MTs participate in the processes of regulation of the homeostasis of elements, including Zn and Cu, but they can also lead to the detoxification of heavy metals (e.g., cadmium and copper). Another basic function of MTs is the removal of oxygen-free radicals—mainly the hydroxyl radical (˙OH) and the superoxide radical anion (O2) [24, 25].

In humans, MTs are encoded by 19 genes located on the long arm of chromosome 16, but so far, only 11 types of functional MT proteins have been described (MT1A, MT1B, MT1E, MT1F, MT1G, MT1H, MT1M, MT1X, MT2A, MT3, and MT4) [25]. Moreover, four basic MT isoforms have been identified: MT-I, M-II, MT-III, and MT-IV. Isoforms MT-I and MT-II are common in both normal tissue and inflamed or neoplastic tissue. MT-III’s expression has been found mainly in brain tissue, epithelial cells of the prostate, and kidneys, as well as in some neoplasms. The presence of the MT-IV isoform has been found, among others, in the stratified squamous epithelium and the upper gastrointestinal tract (Table 1) [2629]. The analysis of immunohistochemical expression of metallothionein I-II isoforms in colon epithelial cells (own material) [30] was shown in Figure 1.


MT-I/IINucleated cells of normal tissue and inflamed or neoplastic tissue, CNS glial cells, interstitial fluids, and blood plasma (in free form)
MT-IIINeurons, renal tubular cells, certain tumor cells
MT-IVSquamous epithelial cells

CNS: central nervous system.

Local MTs expression regulation may depend, among other factors, on exposition to heavy metals, inflammation, and its related cytokine production and intensification of oxidative stress, and cancer [3134]. An increase in MTs synthesis was observed in the case of inflammation caused by bacterial, viral, and fungal agents [3436], as well as the use of glucocorticoids [25]. In case of inflammation, glucocorticoids lead to the increase in the intracellular labile Zn pool and promote activation of metal response elements (MREs) through a metal transcription factor (MTF-1). The immune cascade leads to the release of IL-6, IL-11 G-CSF, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that interact with sites in the promotor region of the MT gene by inducing tyrosine phosphorylation of signal transducers and activator proteins (STATs) or metal response elements (MREs) (Figure 2) [37].

In studies in the animal model, it has been shown that, in mice with MT gene knockout, compared to wild-type specimens, both the respiratory and intraperitoneal administration of lipopolysaccharides cause significant tissue damage, which indicates anti-inflammatory properties of MTs, resulting, for instance, from the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines [38, 39]. A significantly higher expression of cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2), and keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC) was observed in the lungs, kidneys, liver, and blood of MT (-/-) mice compared to the control group [38, 39]. Other authors have shown that some proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IFNɣ, are inducers for the MT-I and MT-II genes [34]. As previously mentioned, MTs are also important in antiviral defense [36]. An increase in the synthesis and an accumulation of MTs was observed in the nuclei of hepatocytes infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). The antiviral effect was enhanced by Zn administration, which induced the synthesis of MTs [40].

2.1. Role of Zn in the Regulation of Metallothionein Expression in Patients with IBD

Zn deficiency is often observed in patients with IBDs, especially those with CD [41]. This is a consequence of the lack of an adequate supply of this element as a result of an impaired appetite as well as hypoalbuminemia and malabsorption syndrome that may appear after the resection of a fragment of the small intestine [42]. So far, it has been demonstrated that Zn supplementation has a positive effect on the course of the disease, which was justified by the positive effect of this element in the tightness of the intestinal barrier, for which tight junctions (TJs), among others, are responsible [43]. The phenomenon described may also be related to the improvement of the epithelial repair functions, which was demonstrated in a study using intestinal epithelial cell lines. However, a positive effect was obtained after the cells were treated in vitro with physiological concentrations of Zn. The 10-fold higher dose of zinc led to cell damage and disorders of the repair functions [44]. Moreover, Zn sulphate has therapeutic effects on the cell oxidative damage by the increase of MT synthesis that was shown on the tongue tissues of rats [45].

In studies in the animal model, it has been shown that an increase in Zn consumption leads to an increase in MT synthesis in intestinal cells [46]. However, mice without MT expression accumulated lower amounts of Zn in the distal part of the gut despite a diet rich in this element compared to individuals from the control group (MT+/+) [47]. Other researchers confirmed in the mouse model the beneficial effects of excess dietary Zn on the prevention of colitis driven by the multifaceted roles of MTs [48]. Moreover, Zn supplementation may be a strong stimulant of MTs synthesis in the ischaemic tissue and reperfusion that was shown in the rat model [49]. It should be emphasized that Zn is recognized as one of the regulators of the functions of innate and acquired immunity. The participation of Zn has been shown in the process of activation of Th1 and B lymphocytes, as well as in the production of immunoglobulins. The function of macrophages is also positively regulated by the ions of this element, which ensures further NK cell activation, cytokine production, and phagocytosis [50]. Accordingly, in the case of Zn deficiency, an increased risk of infections due to bacteria, fungi, and viruses has been observed. Moreover, zinc deficiency is an important factor contributing to the immune aging process [51]. On the other hand, too high doses of this element may have a toxic effect on the cells of the immune system [52]. Studies have shown that MTs’ participation in the immune response takes place, among others, by regulating the intracellular Zn pool [37]. In humans, about 10% of the entire proteome are Zn-binding enzymes or transcription factors, including proteins with the Cys4 and Cys2His2 zinc finger domains [53]. MTs, by influencing the accumulation of Zn in the cell or its release, are indirect regulators of the synthesis of Zn-dependent proteins important for the functioning of cells, such as Sp1, p53, or NF-κB, which is a transcription factor for, among others, the IL-1β, TNFα, and ICAM-1 genes. This is of particular importance in the case of IBDs due to the participation of the aforementioned cytokines and adhesion molecules in the inflammatory process [5456]. In an in vitro study, it was shown that Zn, by inducing the expression of the zinc finger protein A20, inhibits the activation of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), reducing the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα [57], which is a key cytokine in the development of IBDs. Through zinc-binding, MTs may attenuate this phenomenon [54]. However, there are reports that indicate a negative influence of MTs on the expression of NF-κB through interaction with TNFα [9, 58]. Intracellular Zn concentration depends on the activation of two families of Zn transporters: ZnT (SLC30) and Zip (SLC39). ZnT increases the influx of Zn ions into the cell and their storage in the cell organelles. In turn, Zip allows the influx of Zn into the cytoplasm [59]. It has been shown that the expression of these transporters can be regulated by proinflammatory cytokines [60].

At the same time, as mentioned earlier, Zn deficiency has a negative effect on the development and functions of both acquired and innate immunity that may promote autoimmune processes [60, 61]. In patients with Zn deficiency, a lower activity of thymulin has been observed. Thymulin is a hormone produced by the thymus necessary for the proper course of the maturation process of T helper (Th) lymphocytes; hence, a Zn deficiency leads to disturbances in the Th1/Th2 balance [62]. Additionally, it has been shown that the expression of Th1 profile cytokines (IL-2, IL-12, and IFNɣ) depends on the concentration of Zn ions [63]. It was observed in an in vitro study on human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) and later confirmed in vivo in a mouse model that the stimulation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-2 (NOD-2) receptors, belonging to the group of pattern recognition receptors (PRR), was associated with an increase in MT expression in MDM cells. As a consequence, increasing the intracellular Zn pool enhanced the clearance of bacteria via autophagy in macrophages [64]. It is worth noting that a faulty function of NOD-2 is associated with the development of CD [65]. Moreover, the aforementioned Zn membrane transporters (among others, Zip-8), whose expression is regulated by NF-κB, participate in the inhibition of the inflammatory response through the regulation of the IκB kinase (IKK), dependent on the concentration of Zn. This also confirms the potential participation of the element in the development of IBD [66].

2.2. Role of Metallothioneins in Antioxidant Processes in Patients with IBD

MTs, acting as scavengers of oxygen free radicals, play an important role in maintaining the antioxidant balance, which has been demonstrated in in vitro tests [67, 68]. Oxygen free radicals can be generated, among others, by UV radiation and X-rays. They can also be the result of reactions catalyzed by metals or simply be released by inflammatory cells, including macrophages and neutrophils during an inflammatory reaction [69]. Under physiological conditions, ROS are neutralized by enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR). The inactivation of any of these enzymes weakens the body’s antioxidant defense [70]. The glutathione-related antioxidant system also participates in the defense against ROS [71]. In the case of loss of the compensatory capacity of the system, ROS are not neutralized, which leads to lipid peroxidation, protein damage, and cell death. It has been demonstrated that, in comparison to healthy people, in patients with IBD, there is an increased local ROS activity that correlates with the disease activity and a decreased antioxidant barrier [7274]. ROS damage the epithelial barrier by destroying the so-called tight connections, which increases the barrier permeability [75]. It was shown that lipid peroxidation, estimated by the malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, was elevated in the plasma of IBD patients when compared to healthy individuals [76]. Moreover, MDA concentration was increased in both the inflamed CD and the inflamed UC mucosa. However, in CD, lipid peroxidation was independently associated with the concentration of MTs [77]. Luceri et al. demonstrated that, in the group of patients with CD, markers of oxidative stress such as advanced glycated end-products (AGEs) together with the specific receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) and advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) may be pathogenic factors of the disease, but also potential targets of therapy [78]. Hamoude et al. observed in patients with UC (including those with dysplasia of the colon epithelium) a positive correlation between the concentration of AOPP in the serum and MTs [79]. The significant antioxidant properties of MTs have been demonstrated, for instance, in a study conducted by Miura et al. In the experiment, MTs reduced reactive forms of oxygen and inhibited the lipid peroxidation process in a significantly stronger way than reduced glutathione [80]. Therefore, overexpression of MTs in IBD patients may constitute an important form of defense against ROS generated during an intensified local inflammatory reaction [81, 82].

The local increase in MT expression is related not only to the presence of inflammation but also to decreased apoptosis and increased cell proliferation in, among others, Barrett’s esophagus, tongue epithelium, and breast and colorectal cancer [83]. Rios et al. demonstrated in an animal model the antiapoptotic activity of MTs due, for example, to the protective effect on exposure to oxygen free radicals in rats subjected to spinal cord injuries [84]. By virtue of the likely different immune mechanisms observed in CU and CD and hence the different intensity of apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells in both diseases, the expression of MTs should also differ between these two groups of patients [9]. Moreover, due to the influence of intestinal dysbiosis on an increased ROS activity, the antioxidant role of MTs may also play a significant role in the pathogenesis of UC and CD [73, 85].

2.3. MT Expression in IBD Patients

A review of the available literature shows individual studies in which MT expression was assessed both in an animal model of colitis and in IBD patients. Tsuji et al. conducted studies on a model of acute colitis in mice, and they demonstrated a positive role of MTs in preventing inflammation. In the experiments conducted by this group of researchers, after administration of the factor causing colitis, a significantly higher local increase in the synthesis of myeloperoxidase and proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IFN-γ, and IL-17) was observed in the group of mice with an MTI/II (-/-) knockout compared to wild-type specimens [86]. On the other hand, the results of the research conducted by Tran et al. indicate different conclusions. In an experiment carried out in mice with induced colitis, it was shown that animals with an MT (-/-) knockout had a lower disease severity than those MT (+/+), which suggests no preventive effect of MTs in the development of inflammation [87]. This is confirmed by the results of Devisscher et al., who observed that the blockade of extracellular MT pools may even lead to a reduction in colitis in mice [88].

In the studies conducted on human tissue, most authors showed a lower local MT expression in the intestinal epithelium of patients with IBD compared to the healthy population [8992]. On the other hand, Bruwer et al. and Dooley et al. obtained the opposite results [93, 94]. MT expression in the intestinal mucosa was also compared in groups of patients with CD and UC, but the results did not show any statistically significant differences [91, 95]. The analyses also took into consideration different groups of drugs used in this group of patients. Elmes et al. [90] showed no significant effect of steroid therapy on MT expression, while Clarkson et al. [89] observed a higher local MT expression in patients treated with glucocorticoids. Attempts were also made to investigate the influence of inflammation on the intensity of MT expression. Devisscher et al., in an experimental model of colitis in mice, showed a higher local expression of MTs during the period of active inflammation than in remission [96]. Hamouda et al. assessed MTs as potential markers of dysplasia on the inflamed intestinal mucosa in patients with UC. However, no significant differences were observed between the concentration of MTs in the serum of patients with dysplasia and that of patients not suffering from it [79]. Genetic variants of MTs predisposing to the development of CD (New Zealand population) were also searched for, but no positive results were obtained [97].

Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that most of the studies presented were conducted in animal models or in small patient groups that did not even divide the patients into groups according to age and sex. Taking into account the different pathogenetic background of the disease in children and adults, it seems reasonable to take the age of the patients into consideration. Moreover, studies of the expression of MTs in IBD patients have so far been carried out with the use of many different techniques (immunohistochemistry, radioimmunological methods, and mRNA assessment), which, bearing in mind the limitations of each method, make it difficult to draw unambiguous conclusions due to the lack of repeated observations by independent researchers.

2.4. MTs as Potential Targets for IBD Treatment

As previously mentioned, the use of modern methods for treating patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, including biological drugs, does not always guarantee to achieve the remission of the disease. Researchers are constantly looking for new diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets, which should be aimed directly at inhibiting the development of the inflammatory process, based on a deeper understanding of the mechanism and supported by molecular biology methods [55].

The reports presented by Devisscher et al. suggest that MTs may be one of those therapeutic targets in patients with IBD due to their participation in the inflammatory process. This concept was based on the possibility of blocking the extracellular MT pool [88]. As described above, the intracellular MTs can act as a reservoir of essential heavy metals, a scavenger of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and play a protective role against inflammation [98]. On the other hand, the presence of MTs outside the cells is the result of the influence of stressors and cellular damage and may be observed in various conditions, including autoimmune diseases. Extracellular MTs may promote the migration of leukocytes to the place of inflammation [98, 99]. Thus, MT blockage may be effective in patients expressing elevated extracellular levels of MTs [55]. Studies in a mouse model with induced intestinal inflammation showed that MT (-/-) mice experienced a less intense inflammation (assessed on the basis of survival, weight loss, intestinal length, and intensity of local inflammatory cell infiltration) than wild-type specimens. Moreover, the authors showed that blocking the extracellular MT pool through the use of the appropriate antibodies inhibits the development of inflammatory infiltrate composed of macrophages. Additionally, with the use of single-photon emission tomography, after the administration of radioactive anti-MT antibodies to mice, they observed an antibody accumulation in the large intestine and a decrease in the signal during the period of clinical improvement. In a study on human tissue from patients with colitis, the researchers also showed inflammatory infiltrates composed of MT-expressing cells, which correlated with the severity of the inflammation [88].

Dostie et al. suggest that MT blockade with the use of monoclonal antibodies may be one of the methods for treating CD and UC patients in the future [55]. This concept is based on the results of studies that indicate MTs’ function of stimulating the inflammatory process, regardless of whether these MTs are released from the cell or administered exogenously [88, 100]. This approach would have the advantage of blocking the extracellular pool of TMs released during tissue injury, which is when MTs act as a chemotactic factor for the inflammatory cells. The potential inhibition of the extracellular activity of MTs, for instance with the use of biological therapy, could prove effective in a group of patients diagnosed with MT overexpression. Due to the lack of activity in the intracellular MT pool, the activity of these proteins would not be limited, for example, in antioxidant processes. The aforementioned therapy could reduce the side effects observed when administering other biological preparations, and it would increase the treatment success rate in this group of patients [55]. However, it should be noted that any potential therapy should be approached with caution. The majority of cited studies were performed on cells or animal models, which is a significant limitation. Taking into account that the role of MTs in the pathogenesis of colitis is uncertain, the studies on representative groups, using human tissues, especially in different stages of inflammation, are necessary to discuss the role of MTs in the UC and CD pathogenesis and the potential goal of treatment. Moreover, it should be emphasized that the potential use of monoclonal antibodies in the future may probably be addressed only to the subjects expressing elevated extracellular levels of MTs.

3. Conclusions

The role of MTs in the inflammatory process in patients with IBDs has not been clearly defined so far. The regulation of the homeostasis of Zn ions and the antioxidant defense suggest a potential role of MTs in protecting cells against factors that can stimulate inflammation. However, local stimulation of the inflammatory process has been demonstrated both when cells release MTs and when MTs are administered exogenously. This discrepancy encourages the continuation of research in this area, especially with the use of human tissue and taking into account the clinicopathological data as well as the differentiation of patients with UC and CD. If the proinflammatory effect of MTs in IBDs is confirmed, the possibility of inducing the extracellular blockade of these proteins seems to be a promising solution in the treatment of this group of patients.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study can be provided by the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland—subsidy for conducting research activities at the Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital—Research Institute.

References

  1. G. R. D'Haens, R. B. Sartor, M. S. Silverberg, J. Petersson, and P. Rutgeerts, “Future directions in inflammatory bowel disease management,” Journal of Croh’s and Colitis, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 726–734, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. Khor, A. Gardet, and R. J. Xavier, “Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature, vol. 474, no. 7351, pp. 307–317, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. N. Ananthakrishnan, “Epidemiology and risk factors for IBD,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 205–217, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. S. P. de Souza and C. Fiocchi, “Immunopathogenesis of IBD: current state of the art,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Horiuchi, H. Mitoma, S.-i. Harashima, H. Tsukamoto, and T. Shimoda, “Transmembrane TNF-: structure, function and interaction with anti-TNF agents,” Rheumatology, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1215–1228, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. L. Jump and A. D. Levine, “Mechanisms of natural tolerance in the intestine,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 462–478, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. I. Schoultz and A. Keita, “Cellular and molecular therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease-focusing on intestinal barrier function,” Cells, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 193, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. Monteleone, D. Fina, R. Caruso, and F. Pallone, “New mediators of immunity and inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease,” Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 361–364, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Waeytens, M. De Vos, and D. Laukens, “Evidence for a potential role of metallothioneins in inflammatory bowel diseases,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2009, Article ID 729172, 9 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. Rawla, T. Sunkara, and J. P. Raj, “Role of biologics and biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: current trends and future perspectives,” Journal of Inflammation Research, vol. 11, pp. 215–226, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Adamina, S. Bonovas, T. Raine et al., “ECCO guidelines on therapeutics in crohn's disease: surgical treatment,” Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 155–168, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. M. Ruemmele, G. Veres, K. L. Kolho et al., “Consensus guidelines of ECCO/ESPGHAN on the medical management of pediatric Crohn’s disease,” Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1179–1207, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. Turner, F. M. Ruemmele, E. Orlanski-Meyer et al., “Management of paediatric ulcerative colitis, Part 1: ambulatory care-an evidence-based guideline from European crohn's and colitis organization and European society of paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 257–291, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. E. Sands, W. J. Sandborn, R. Panaccione et al., “Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 381, no. 13, pp. 1201–1214, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. S. Seyed Tabib, M. Madgwick, P. Sudhakar, B. Verstockt, T. Korcsmaros, and S. Vermeire, “Big data in IBD: big progress for clinical practice,” Gut, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1520–1532, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. U. Wong and R. K. Cross, “Primary and secondary nonresponse to infliximab: mechanisms and countermeasures,” Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1039–1046, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Stallmach, S. Hagel, and T. Bruns, “Adverse effects of biologics used for treating IBD,” Best Practice and Research Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 167–182, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. L. Scribano, “Adverse events of IBD therapies,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. S210–S211, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Oka and R. B. Sartor, “Microbial-based and microbial-targeted therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 757–788, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Margoses and B. Valle, “A cadmium binding protein for equine kidney cortex,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 79, pp. 4813-4814, 1957. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. A. Lynes, J. Hidalgo, Y. Manso, L. Devisscher, D. Laukens, and D. A. Lawrence, “Metallothionein and stress combine to affect multiple organ systems,” Cell Stress and Chaperones, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 605–611, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Koszucka and G. Dąbrowska, “Roślinne metalotioneiny,” Postępy Biologii Komórki., vol. 2, no. 33, pp. 285–302, 2006, in polish. View at: Google Scholar
  23. P. Dziegiel, “Expression of metallothioneins in tumor cells,” Polish Journal of Pathology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  24. B. Ruttkay-Nedecky, L. Nejdl, J. Gumulec et al., “The role of metallothionein in oxidative stress,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 6044–6066, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Laukens, A. Waeytens, P. De Bleser, C. Cuvelier, and M. De Vos, “Human metallothionein expression under normal and pathological conditions: mechanisms of gene regulation based on in silico promoter analysis,” Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 301–317, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Tan, R. Sinniah, B.-h. Bay, and G. Singh, “Metallothionein expression and nuclear size in benign, borderline, and malignant serous ovarian tumours,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 60–65, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. Romero-Isart and M. Vasák, “Advances in the structure and chemistry of metallothioneins,” J Inorg Biochem, vol. 88, no. 3-4, pp. 388–396, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. G. Hoey, S. H. Garrett, M. A. Sens, J. H. Todd, and D. A. Sens, “Expression of MT-3 mRNA in human kidney, proximal tubule cell cultures, and renal cell carcinoma,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Moffatt and C. Séguin, “Expression of the gene encoding metallothionein-3 in organs of the reproductive system,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 501–510, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Jankowska-Konsur, C. Kobierzycki, A. Reich, J. Grzegrzolka, A. Bieniek, and P. Dziegiel, “Expression of SATB1, MTI/II and ki-67 in mycosis fungoides,” Anticancer Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 189–197, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Hernández, J. Carrasco, E. Belloso et al., “Metallothionein induction by restraint stress: role of glucocorticoids and IL-6,” Cytokine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 791–796, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Dziegiel, J. Forgacz, E. Suder, P. Surowiak, J. Kornafel, and M. Zabel, “Prognostic significance of metallothionein expression in correlation with Ki-67 expression in adenocarcinomas of large intestine,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 401–407, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. Dziegiel, W. Salwa-Zurawska, J. Zurawski, A. Wojnar, and M. Zabel, “Prognostic significance of augmented metallothionein (MT) expression correlated with Ki-67 antigen expression in selected soft tissue sarcomas,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 83–89, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. K. De, M. T. McMaster, and G. K. Andrews, “Endotoxin induction of murine metallothionein gene expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 25, pp. 15267–15274, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. Subramanian Vignesh, J. A. Landero Figueroa, A. Porollo, J. A. Caruso, and G. S. Deepe, “Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor induced Zn sequestration enhances macrophage superoxide and limits intracellular pathogen survival,” Immunity, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 697–710, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. A. Read, S. Obeid, C. Ahlenstiel, and G. Ahlenstiel, “The role of zinc in antiviral immunity,” Advances in Nutrition, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 696–710, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Coyle, J. C. Philcox, L. C. Carey, and A. M. Rofe, “Metallothionein: the multipurpose protein,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS), vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 627–647, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. H. Takano, K. Inoue, R. Yanagisawa et al., “Protective role of metallothionein in acute lung injury induced by bacterial endotoxin,” Thorax, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1057–1062, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. i. Inoue, H. Takano, A. Shimada et al., “Role of metallothionein in coagulatory disturbance and systemic inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 533–535, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. A. Read, G. Parnell, D. Booth, M. W. Douglas, J. George, and G. Ahlenstiel, “The antiviral role of zinc and metallothioneins in hepatitis C infection,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 491–501, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Siva, D. T. Rubin, G. Gulotta, K. Wroblewski, and J. Pekow, “Zinc deficiency is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 152–157, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. Matsui, “Zinc deficiency in Crohn's disease,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 924-925, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. G. C. Sturniolo, V. Di Leo, A. Ferronato, A. D’Odorico, and R. D’Incà, “Zinc supplementation tightens “leaky gut” in crohn's disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 94–98, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. E. Cario, S. Jung, J. Harder D'Heureuse et al., “Effects of exogenous zinc supplementation on intestinal epithelial repair in vitro,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 419–428, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. B. B. Bayrak, P. Arda-Pirincci, S. Bolkent, and R. Yanardag, “Zinc prevents ethanol-induced oxidative damage in lingual tissues of rats,” Biological Trace Element Research, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. J. Cousins and L. M. Lee-Ambrose, “Nuclear zinc uptake and interactions and metallothionein gene expression are influenced by dietary zinc in rats,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. D. Tran, R. N. Butler, J. C. Philcox, A. M. Rofe, G. S. Howarth, and P. Coyle, “Regional distribution of metallothionein and zinc in the mouse gut,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 239–251, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. Foligné, F. George, A. Standaert et al., “High‐dose dietary supplementation with zinc prevents gut inflammation: investigation of the role of metallothioneins and beyond by transcriptomic and metagenomic studies,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 12615–12633, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. B. Yazğan, A. K. Baltaci, R. Mogulkoc, and M. C. Avunduk, “Zinc is a strong stimulant of metallothionein synthesis in the ischaemic testis tissue,” Andrologia, vol. 4, Article ID e14042, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. H. Shankar and A. S. Prasad, “Zinc and immune function: the biological basis of altered resistance to infection,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 447S–463S, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. P. Wong, K. R. Magnusson, T. J. Sharpton, and E. Ho, “Effects of zinc status on age-related T cell dysfunction and chronic inflammation,” Biometals, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 291–301, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. L. M. Plum, L. Rink, and H. Haase, “The essential toxin: impact of zinc on human health,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1342–1365, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. C. Andreini, L. Banci, I. Bertini, and A. Rosato, “Counting the zinc-proteins encoded in the human genome,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 196–201, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. H. Kim, J. H. Kim, J. Lee, and Y. S. Ahn, “Zinc-induced NF-κB inhibition can be modulated by changes in the intracellular metallothionein level,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 189–196, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. E. Dostie, A. V. Thees, and M. A. Lynes, “Metallothionein: a novel therapeutic target for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 24, no. 27, pp. 3155–3161, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. Bao, M.-J. Liu, B. Lee et al., “Zinc modulates the innate immune response in vivo to polymicrobial sepsis through regulation of NF-κB,” American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 298, no. 6, pp. L744–L754, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. S. Prasad, B. Bao, F. W. J. Beck, O. Kucuk, and F. H. Sarkar, “Antioxidant effect of zinc in humans,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1182–1190, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Sakurai, S. Hara, N. Okano, Y. Kondo, J. Inoue, and N. Imura, “Regulatory role of metallothionein in NF-kappaB activation,” FEBS Letter, vol. 455, no. 1-2, pp. 55–58, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Foster and S. Samman, “Zinc and regulation of inflammatory cytokines: implications for cardiometabolic disease,” Nutrients, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 676–694, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. C. Lang, C. Murgia, M. Leong et al., “Anti-inflammatory effects of zinc and alterations in zinc transporter mRNA in mouse models of allergic inflammation,” American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. L577–L584, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. I. Wessels, M. Maywald, and L. Rink, “Zinc as a gatekeeper of immune function,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 1286, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. S. Prasad, “Zinc: mechanisms of host defense,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 1345–1349, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. S. Prasad, “Clinical, immunological, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant roles of zinc,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 370–377, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Lahiri and C. Abraham, “Activation of pattern recognition receptors up-regulates metallothioneins, thereby increasing intracellular accumulation of zinc, autophagy, and bacterial clearance by macrophages,” Gastroenterology, vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 835–846, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. W. Strober, N. Asano, I. Fuss, A. Kitani, and T. Watanabe, “Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying NOD2 risk-associated polymorphisms in Crohn's disease,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 260, no. 1, pp. 249–260, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M.-J. Liu, S. Bao, M. Gálvez-Peralta et al., “ZIP8 regulates host defense through zinc-mediated inhibition of NF-κB,” Cell Reports, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 386–400, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. P. J. Thornalley and M. Vašák, “Possible role for metallothionein in protection against radiation-induced oxidative stress. Kinetics and mechanism of its reaction with superoxide and hydroxyl radicals,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, vol. 827, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. L. Cai, J. B. Klein, and Y. J. Kang, “Metallothionein inhibits peroxynitrite-induced DNA and lipoprotein damage,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 50, pp. 38957–38960, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. E. Cadenas, “Biochemistry of oxygen toxicity,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 79–110, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. W. B. Jakoby and D. M. Ziegler, “The enzymes of detoxication,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 34, pp. 20715–20718, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. F. Salvemini, A. Franzé, A. Iervolino, S. Filosa, S. Salzano, and M. V. Ursini, “Enhanced glutathione levels and oxidoresistance mediated by increased glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 5, pp. 2750–2757, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. M. Karp and T. R. Koch, “Oxidative stress and antioxidants in inflammatory bowel disease,” Disease-a-Month, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 199–207, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. T. Tian, Z. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Pathomechanisms of oxidative stress in inflammatory bowel disease and potential antioxidant therapies,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 4535194, 18 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. Yuksel, I. Ates, M. Kaplan et al., “Is oxidative stress associated with activation and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease?” Journal of Medical Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 341–348, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. D. Hollander, C. M. Vadheim, E. Brettholz, G. M. Petersen, T. Delahunty, and J. I. Rotter, “Increased intestinal permeability in patients with crohn's disease and their relatives,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 883–885, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. Alzoghaibi, I. Al Mofleh, and A. Al-Jebreen, “Lipid peroxides in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 187–190, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. L. Kruidenier, I. Kuiper, C. B. Lamers, and H. W. Verspaget, “Intestinal oxidative damage in inflammatory bowel disease: semi-quantification, localization, and association with mucosal antioxidants,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. C. Luceri, E. Bigagli, S. Agostiniani et al., “Analysis of oxidative stress-related markers in crohn's disease patients at surgery and correlations with clinical findings,” Antioxidants (Basel), vol. 8, no. 9, p. E378, 2019, pii. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. H. E. Hamouda, S. S. Zakaria, S. A. Ismail, M. A. Khedr, and W. W. Mayah, “p53 antibodies, metallothioneins, and oxidative stress markers in chronic ulcerative colitis with dysplasia,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 19, pp. 2417–2423, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. T. Miura, S. Muraoka, and T. Ogiso, “Antioxidant activity of metallothionein compared with reduced glutathione,” Life Science, vol. 60, no. 21, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. P. Irato, G. Santovito, E. Piccinni, and V. Albergoni, “Oxidative burst and metallothionein as a scavenger in macrophages,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 251–254, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. D. N. Granger, L. A. Hernandez, and M. B. Grisham, “Reactive oxygen metabolites: mediators of cell injury in the digestive system,” Viewpoint Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 18, pp. 13–16, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  83. M. Dutsch-Wicherek, J. Sikora, and R. Tomaszewska, “The possible biological role of metallothionein in apoptosis,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. Volume, no. 13, pp. 4029–4038, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. C. Rios, I. Santander, M. Méndez-Armenta et al., “Metallothionein-I + II reduces oxidative damage and apoptosis after traumatic spinal cord injury in rats,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 3265918, 11 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. K. Subramanian Vignesh and G. Deepe, “Metallothioneins: emerging modulators in immunity and infection,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 10, p. 2197, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. T. Tsuji, Y. Naito, T. Takagi et al., “Role of metallothionein in murine experimental colitis,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1037–1046, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. C. D. Tran, J. M. Ball, S. Sundar, P. Coyle, and G. S. Howarth, “The role of zinc and metallothionein in the dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis mouse model,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2113–2121, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. L. Devisscher, P. Hindryckx, M. A. Lynes et al., “Role of metallothioneins as danger signals in the pathogenesis of colitis,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 233, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. J. P. Clarkson, M. E. Elmes, B. Jasani, and M. Webb, “Histological demonstration of immunoreactive zinc metallothionein in liver and ileum of rat and man,” The Histochemical Journal, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 343–352, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. M. E. Elmes, J. P. Clarkson, and B. Jasani, “Histological demonstration of immunoreactive metallothionein in rat and human tissues,” Experientia Supplementum, vol. 52, pp. 533–537, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. T. P. Mulder, H. W. Verspaget, A. R. Janssens, P. A. de Bruin, A. S. Peña, and C. B. Lamers, “Decrease in two intestinal copper/zinc containing proteins with antioxidant function in inflammatory bowel disease,” Gut, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1146–1150, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. G. C. Sturniolo, C. Mestriner, P. E. Lecis et al., “Altered plasma and mucosal concentrations of trace elements and antioxidants in active ulcerative colitis,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 644–649, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. M. Brüwer, K. W. Schmid, K. A. Metz, C. F. Krieglstein, N. Senninger, and G. Schürmann, “Increased expression of metallothionein in inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammation Research, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 289–293, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. T. P. Dooley, E. V. Curto, S. P. Reddy et al., “Regulation of gene expression in inflammatory bowel disease and correlation with IBD drugs,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. E. Ioachim, M. Michael, C. Katsanos, A. Demou, and E. V. Tsianos, “The immunohistochemical expression of metallothionein in inflammatory bowel disease. Correlation with HLA-DR antigen expression, lymphocyte subpopulations and proliferation-associated indices,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 75–82, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. L. Devisscher, P. Hindryckx, K. Olievier, H. Peeters, M. De Vos, and D. Laukens, “Inverse correlation between metallothioneins and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha in colonocytes and experimental colitis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 416, no. 3-4, pp. 307–312, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. A. R. Morgan, A. G. Fraser, and L. R. Ferguson, “Metallothionein genes: no association with Crohn's disease in a New Zealand population,” Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 11, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. M. A. Lynes, K. Zaffuto, D. W. Unfricht, G. Marusov, J. S. Samson, and X. Yin, “The physiological roles of extracellular metallothionein,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 231, no. 9, pp. 1548–1554, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. X. Yin, D. A. Knecht, and M. A. Lynes, “Metallothionein mediates leukocyte chemotaxis,” BMC Immunology, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 21, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. L. A. Borghesi, J. Youn, E. A. Olson, and M. A. Lynes, “Interactions of metallothionein with murine lymphocytes: plasma membrane binding and proliferation,” Toxicology, vol. 108, no. 1-2, pp. 129–140, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Anna Socha-Banasiak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views544
Downloads757
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.