Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology / 2017 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 1671607 |

Hao Zhang, Zhiyi He, Wenting Zeng, Hong-Juan Peng, "Roles of Interferons in Pregnant Women with Dengue Infection: Protective or Dangerous Factors", Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, vol. 2017, Article ID 1671607, 6 pages, 2017.

Roles of Interferons in Pregnant Women with Dengue Infection: Protective or Dangerous Factors

Academic Editor: Maria L. Tornesello
Received15 Jun 2017
Revised01 Aug 2017
Accepted06 Aug 2017
Published07 Sep 2017


Dengue infection is a serious public health problem in tropical and subtropical areas. With the recent outbreaks of Zika disease and its reported correlation with microcephaly, the large number of pregnancies with dengue infection has become a serious concern. This review describes the epidemiological characteristics of pregnancy with dengue and the initial immune response to dengue infection, especially in IFNs production in this group of patients. Dengue is much more prevalent in pregnant women compared with other populations. The severity of dengue is correlated with the level of IFNs, while the serum IFN level must be sufficiently high to maintain the pregnancy and to inhibit virus replication.

1. Background

Dengue is a febrile disease that is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes. It is estimated that approximately 3900 million people in 128 countries are at risk of infection by dengue viruses [1]. This virus infects approximately 390 million people per year, 96 million of whom present disease [2]. The causative agent of dengue is dengue virus (DENV), which belongs to the family Flaviviridae. The clinical phenotype of dengue varies from a self-limiting febrile illness to severe, occasionally life-threatening disease. Typically, symptomatic disease follows three phases: a febrile phase lasting 3 to 7 days; a critical phase characterized by defervescence, during which complications appear in a small proportion of patients; and a spontaneous recovery phase. Complications primarily affect the vascular system and include an unusual plasma leakage syndrome that may result in dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS), which are classified as severe dengue according to the WHO guidelines for dengue diagnosis, treatment, and prevention [3, 4].

In 2015-2016, Zika virus caused large outbreaks in Pacific areas and in Central and South America [5]. Increasing data have shown that Zika virus infection is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as fetal death, premature birth, and microcephalus [6]. Thus, DENV infection which belongs to the same family of Flaviviridae as Zika virus has become a serious concern in pregnant women.

2. Dengue in Pregnant Woman

With an estimated yearly case number of 390 million from more than 100 countries and regions in Asia, Oceania, America, and Africa, dengue fever (DF) is now one of the most important vector-borne diseases worldwide [2]. As reported in recent studies, a high rate of dengue infection has been observed in pregnant women. An investigation of 358 pregnant women in Malaysia, a dengue endemic country, showed that a seropositivity for dengue infection of approximately 35.8% by ELISA [7]. Additionally, in another dengue endemic country, Thailand, the dengue seroprevalence can reach 90.3% [8]. It must be noted, however, that these data were collected during the Chikungunya disease outbreak [8], raising the possibility of false positivity. In the African country, the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, 39.74% of pregnant women were found to be positive for DENV antibodies [9]. These findings indicate that pregnant women have high a risk of dengue virus infection.

However, the prognosis for the pregnant women infected with dengue remains unknown. There might be two explanations. One explanation is that dengue infection is aggravated in pregnant women. Adam et al. reported that, among 30 pregnant women infected by dengue virus, approximately 38.3% of them developed dengue hemorrhagic fever or dengue shock syndrome, and the mortality could reach 21.7% [10]. Machado et al. also reported that 46.5% of pregnant women infected by dengue virus developed severe dengue, as compared with 22.5% of nonpregnant women [11]. These reports indicated that pregnant women infected with dengue virus had a greater tendency to experience illness progression to severe dengue and higher mortality, as compared with infected nonpregnant women. The other explanation is that adverse pregnancy outcomes emerge after infection. A recent meta-analysis indicated that common adverse outcomes of pregnant women with dengue infection were stillbirth (crude relative risk: 6.7), miscarriage (odds ratio: 3.51), preterm birth (odds ratio: 1.71), and low birth weight (odds ratio: 1.71) [12]. A miscarriage was recently reported to occur in a pregnant woman infected by dengue virus, and DENV RNA was detected in fetal material [13]. Thus, dengue infection in pregnant women should undoubtedly be taken seriously.

3. Initial Immune Response to Dengue in Pregnant Women

Dengue fever is widely accepted as an immunopathological disease. Thus, the pathogenesis of dengue can be explained by various mechanisms related to immune factors as follows: (1) enhancement of viral infection through cross-reactive antibodies; (2) activation of cross-reactive memory T cells; (3) a cytokine or inflammatory storm; and (4) complement activation. However, a very large part of dengue pathogenesis remains elusive despite these arduous studies. Since dengue is an immune-related disease, whether infection becomes limited or progressive depends on the competition between defensive and destructive immune responses.

The initial immune response to viral infection is mediated by interferons (IFNs) [14]. IFNs have displayed increasing diversity and activity to “interfere” with viral replication. IFNs are divided into three types: type I mainly represented by IFN-α [15] and IFN-β [16], type II represented by INF-γ [17], and type III including the recently discovered IFN-lambda (IFN-λ) family [18]. Each IFN family member mediates important antiviral activity via engagement with its specific IFN receptor.

3.1. IFN Level in Dengue Infection

Few studies have evaluated serum IFNs level in pregnant women during dengue infection. However, a larger number of studies have explored serum IFN levels in dengue patients. For type I IFNs, the serum level of IFN-β was significantly higher in primary DHF patients than in patients with dengue fever [19], suggesting that high levels of IFN-β might accompany a worsened progression of the disease. However, the other type 1 IFN, IFN-α, displayed an opposite phenomenon. The serum IFN-α level was significantly higher in DF patients than in DHF patients, irrespective of the DENV serotypes [20], and the dynamic change of serum level significantly reduced in 3–5 days after fever onset (DENV-1: reduced from 94.42 pg/mL to 36.12 pg/mL; DENV-2: reduced from 53.39 pg/mL to 38.25 pg/mL). Also the serum level of IFN-α was significantly higher in dengue patients than in healthy individuals [21]. These findings suggest that the early robust production of IFN-α may be correlated with a better clinical condition with respect to dengue infection and disease progression. Thus, the roles of type I IFNs in dengue infection are contradictory and complicated.

For type II IFNs, the serum level of IFN-γ was higher in dengue patients than in healthy individuals [22]. The same finding was also reported by Feitosa et al. [23]. The serum level of IFN-γ was gradually decreased in 3–5 days, 6-7 days, 8–10 days, and 14–17 days since illness onset in both mild and severe dengue patients [24], and it was higher in severe dengue patients in 8–10 days after illness onset compared with the mild dengue patients, but no difference was found in the other times between these two groups [24]. This observation was confirmed by a cohort study reported by Cui et al. [25]. However, the higher level of IFN-γ was found in patients within 96 hours from fever onset. According to these findings, the high concentration of IFN-γ in dengue patient serum may indicate a high risk of disease progression to severe dengue.

For type III IFNs, there are few clinical studies reporting mild or severe dengue. Nevertheless, in vitro studies found that dengue virus infection could induce the production of IFN-λ [26]. An elevated serum IFN-λ level was also observed in patients with dengue fever, compared to healthy blood donors, and IFN-λ could inhibit dengue virus replication in vitro [27].

In general, a high serum level of IFNs in dengue patients accompanies a high risk of disease progression to severe dengue. This raises the question of whether lower serum IFN level indicates a lower risk of disease progression to severe dengue. The answer to this question is “no.” It has been reported that the mean level of serum IFN-γ in DF cases was higher than that in DHF patients, which implied that low serum IFN-γ level might be associated with severe diseases [28]. A Recent research has shown that the serum IFN-γ concentration in dengue patients is negatively correlated with the dengue virus load, indicating that a lower the serum level of IFN-γ is correlated with a higher dengue viral load in dengue patients [29]. Although dengue virus is regarded as an immunopathological disease, it is also dire [30]. Additionally, a high viral load is one important cause of severe dengue because the virus can destroy host cells and lead to vascular leakage, which accelerates disease progression in a short period of time [31, 32]. Thus, one strategy to reduce the possibility of disease progression to severe dengue is to decrease the dengue viral load. Therefore, a high level of type II IFNs is needed for the treatment of dengue patients in clinics. It has been also reported that, during acute infection, higher serum levels of IFN-β [6.69 (0.15~34.9) pg/mL] were found in DHF patients with primary infection than that [2.35 (0~10.1) pg/mL] in the DHF patients with secondary infection [19]. To this point, the serum IFN-β level of dengue patients was not associated with dengue progression.

3.2. IFN Level in Pregnant Women

IFNs are expressed by the trophectoderm of primates, rodents, and ungulates during peri-implantation [33]. Conceptus IFNs are pregnancy signals for maternal recognition in ruminants (cattle, sheep, and goats); they act on the endometrium to indirectly maintain progesterone synthesis [34]. Additionally, studies investigating IFN signaling in the uterus of livestock species suggest that it modulates maternal immune tolerance to the implanting conceptus, changes in the endometrial architecture for uterine receptivity, and vascular remodeling for maternal-fetal nutrient and waste exchange [35, 36]. Although these findings for IFNs have rarely been reported in humans, they are still useful references for pregnant women. Although few studies have described the outcomes of pregnancy with dengue and the relationship between IFNs and pregnancy after DENV infection, such findings have been extensively reported for Zika virus, which belongs to the same family of Flaviviruses as DENV. In a mouse model, type I IFNs could control vaginal Zika virus replication [37]. In vitro, Zika virus infection has been shown to cause the constitutive release of IFN-λ, the antiviral type III IFN, by human placental trophoblast cells [38]. These findings raise the question of whether a higher level of IFNs is beneficial for pregnant women with dengue infection. The answer to this question is also “no.” In an in vitro embryo culture study, IFN-β showed no macroscopic teratogenic effect on embryonic development, but it caused growth retardation in embryos [39].

Li et al. also showed that IFN-γ could induce pregnancy failure by moderating natural killer (NK) cells [40], and it could dramatically increase decidual apoptosis [41]. In a case control study, women with extremely low birth weight infants with accepted induced spontaneous conception or assisted reproductive technology showed increased production of IFN-γ [42]. Furthermore, IFN use in pregnant women is not advised, especially given its known antiproliferative effects [43]. A cohort study has indicated that IFN therapy during the first trimester of pregnancy can lead to a high risk of fetal loss and low birth weight [44]. Animal trials have demonstrated that IFN-γ administration can result in pregnancy failure [45, 46]. Thus, in pregnant women, IFNs should be maintained at a certain level for a stable pregnancy.

3.3. The Mechanism by Which IFNs Induce Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

Most adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with pathogen infection, although the precise mechanism leading to adverse outcomes via infection is unknown. One established factor is the specific immune response to pathogen infection in pregnant women. Whether IFNs, particularly IFN-γ, play a positive or negative role during pregnancy has raised numerous controversies. For other IFN family members, few studies have focused on their influence on pregnant women with dengue virus. Our knowledge is derived mostly from animal or in vitro experimental studies, because data for human pregnancies are scarce.

In vitro, IFN-γ is cytotoxic to human trophoblast cells [47] and inhibits their proliferation [48]. An in vitro experiment showed that the levels of IFN-γ secreted by decidual NK cells were closely correlated with trophoblasts apoptosis in response to Toxoplasma gondii infection [49]. Comba et al. reported that the levels of IFN-γ in blood and endometrial tissue were significantly higher in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss than in women with normal fertility [50].

IFN-γ can also lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes through the following signaling pathways. In a mouse model to induce fetal resorption through the injection of α-galactosylceramide (αGC), decidual invariant NK T cells (iNKT) were activated followed by the upregulation of IFN-γ levels. This adoptive change resulted in pregnancy loss in IFN-γ−/− mice [51]. One signal transduction pathway leads to fetal mortality is class I phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), which converts phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-phosphate to phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-phosphate (PIP3). Acting as a second messenger, PIP3 recruits proteins to the plasma membrane, where they activate signaling pathways that promote cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation [52]. Based on structural similarity, PI3K can be divided into two classes: class IA and class IB. Class IA PI3K forms heterodimers of p85 regulatory subunits and one of the three isoforms of the catalytic p110 subunit (p110-α, p110-β, and p110-δ). PI3K p110-δ is a key mediator of NK cell maturation and function. An absence of p110-δ signaling leads to reduced cytokine release, aberrant maturation, and incorrect trafficking to peripheral organs, including the uterus during pregnancy [53, 54]. When PI3K and p110-δ were deactivated, the uterus showed a decreased level of IFN-γ and elevated IL-6, resulting in fetal death or growth retardation [55]. Simultaneously, IFN-γ can exert feedback control on Ly-49 receptors to regulate NK cell effector functions during pregnancy failure [40]. The other pathway is the Notch signaling pathway, which exerts its effects throughout pregnancy, playing an important role in placental angiogenesis and trophoblast function [56]. During peptidoglycan and polyinosinic:cytidylic acid-induced preterm labor, Notch signaling is activated, resulting in the upregulation of proinflammatory responses with upregulated levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6, and its inhibition improves the in utero survival of live fetuses [57]. In general, the mechanism by which IFNs induce adverse pregnancy outcomes is complicated and requires further study.

4. Conclusion

Dengue is a serious public health problem and also a threat to the pregnant women who have a higher risk of progressing to severe dengue or experiencing adverse pregnancy outcomes after infection. The initial immune response to dengue virus infection, especially with respect to IFN production, was reviewed in this group of patients. Dengue is much more prevalent in pregnant women in comparison to the other groups. The severity of dengue is correlated with the high level of some IFNs in patient’ serum, while the serum IFN level must be maintained at a sufficiently high level to maintain the pregnancy and inhibit dengue virus replication. However, many of the above-described findings represent only clinical phenomena or were derived from in vivo/in vitro animal experiments. The effects of IFNs on human pregnancies are more difficult to study. Hence, further analyses are needed to reach an unambiguous conclusion regarding the roles of IFNs during dengue virus infection, especially in pregnant women.


DENV:Dengue virus
DHF:Dengue hemorrhagic fever
DSS:Dengue shock syndrome
DF:Dengue fever
NK:Nature killer
iNKT:Invariant natural killer T cells
PI3K:Phosphoinositide 3-kinases
PIP3:Phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-phosphate to phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-phosphate.


The funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors were involved in the study design, including setting up the keywords search and project protocol. Hao Zhang and Zhiyi He collected the data information. Hao Zhang drafted manuscript. Wenting Zeng and Hong-Juan Peng were responsible for the supervision of the project and revision of the manuscript.


This study was partly supported by the grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81271866 and 81572012), the Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2014), the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation Key Project (2016A030311025), and Guangzhou Health and Medical Collaborative Innovation Major Special Project (201604020011) to Hong-Juan Peng.


  1. O. J. Brady, P. W. Gething, S. Bhatt et al., “Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 6, no. 8, Article ID e1760, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Bhatt, P. W. Gething, O. J. Brady et al., “The global distribution and burden of dengue,” Nature, vol. 496, no. 7446, pp. 504–507, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. P. Simmons, J. J. Farrar, N. van Vinh Chau, and B. Wills, “Dengue,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 15, pp. 1423–1432, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. O. World, P. F. R. Special, I. T. D. Training, H. O. D. O. World, H. O. E. World, and A. Pandemic, Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control, guidelines for diagnosis, Dengue, 2009.
  5. P. Boeuf, H. E. Drummer, J. S. Richards, M. J. L. Scoullar, and J. G. Beeson, “The global threat of Zika virus to pregnancy: Epidemiology, clinical perspectives, mechanisms, and impact,” BMC Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, article no. 112, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Marrs, G. Olson, G. Saade et al., “Zika Virus and Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature and Clinical Considerations,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 625–639, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. A. Mohamed Ismail, W. E. R. Wan Abd Rahim, S. A. Salleh, H.-M. Neoh, R. Jamal, and M. A. Jamil, “Seropositivity of dengue antibodies during pregnancy,” Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 436975, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. Laoprasopwattana, T. Suntharasaj, P. Petmanee, O. Suddeaugrai, and A. Geater, “Chikungunya and dengue virus infections during pregnancy: Seroprevalence, seroincidence and maternal-fetal transmission, southern Thailand, 2009-2010,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 381–388, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T.-Y. Yen, M. D. J. Trovoada dos Santos, L.-F. Tseng et al., “Seroprevalence of antibodies against dengue virus among pregnant women in the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe,” Acta Tropica, vol. 155, pp. 58–62, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. Adam, A. M. Jumaa, H. M. Elbashir, and M. S. Karsany, “Maternal and perinatal outcomes of dengue in PortSudan, Eastern Sudan,” Virology Journal, vol. 7, article no. 153, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. R. Machado, E. S. Machado, R. Denis Rohloff et al., “Is Pregnancy Associated with Severe Dengue? A Review of Data from the Rio de Janeiro Surveillance Information System,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e2217, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. E. S. Paixão, M. G. Teixeira, M. D. C. N. Costa, and L. C. Rodrigues, “Dengue during pregnancy and adverse fetal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 857–865, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Zavattoni, F. Rovida, G. Campanini et al., “Miscarriage following dengue virus 3 infection in the first six weeks of pregnancy of a dengue virus-naive traveller returning from Bali to Italy, April 2016,” Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, vol. 21, no. 31, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. R. Paludan, “Innate Antiviral Defenses Independent of Inducible IFNα/β Production,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 588–596, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. Allen and K. H. Fantes, “A family of structural genes for human lymphoblastoid (leukocyte-type) interferon,” Nature, vol. 287, no. 5781, pp. 408–411, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Karpusas, M. Nolte, C. B. Benton, W. Meier, W. N. Lipscomb, and S. Goelz, “The crystal structure of human interferon at 2.2-A resolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 94, no. 22, pp. 11813–11818, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. E. Ealick, W. J. Cook, S. Vijay-Kumar et al., “Three-dimensional structure of recombinant human interferon-γ,” Science, vol. 252, no. 5006, pp. 698–702, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. V. Kotenko, G. Gallagher, V. V. Baurin et al., “IFN-λs mediate antiviral protection through a distinct class II cytokine receptor complex,” Nature Immunology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. A. D. S. Oliveira, M. M. C. da Silva, C. E. Calzavara-Silva et al., “Primary dengue haemorrhagic fever in patients from northeast of Brazil is associated with high levels of interferon-β during acute phase,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 378–384, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. I. De La Cruz Hernández, H. Puerta-Guardo, H. Flores-Aguilar et al., “A strong interferon response correlates with a milder dengue clinical condition,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 196–199, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Becquart, N. Wauquier, D. Nkoghe et al., “Acute dengue virus 2 infection in Gabonese patients is associated with an early innate immune response, including strong interferon alpha production,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, article no. 356, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. Pandey, A. Jain, R. K. Garg, R. Kumar, O. P. Agrawal, and P. V. Lakshmana Rao, “Serum levels of IL-8, IFNγ, IL-10, and TGF β and their gene expression levels in severe and non-severe cases of dengue virus infection,” Archives of Virology, vol. 160, no. 6, pp. 1463–1475, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. N. M. Feitosa, A. C. R. Vallinoto, P. F. D. C. Vasconcelos et al., “Gene Polymorphisms and Serum Levels of Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Markers in Dengue Viral Infections,” Viral Immunology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 379–388, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Zhao, X. Huang, W. Hong et al., “Slow resolution of inflammation in severe adult dengue patients,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, article no. 291, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Cui, Y. H. Lee, T. L. Thein et al., “Serum Metabolomics Reveals Serotonin as a Predictor of Severe Dengue in the Early Phase of Dengue Fever,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0004607, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y.-L. Hsu, M.-Y. Wang, L.-J. Ho, and J.-H. Lai, “Dengue virus infection induces interferon-lambda1 to facilitate cell migration,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 24530, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. K. Palma-Ocampo, J. C. Flores-Alonso, V. Vallejo-Ruiz et al., “Interferon lambda inhibits dengue virus replication in epithelial cells,” Virology Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, article no. 150, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. Priyadarshini, R. R. Gadia, A. Tripathy et al., “Clinical findings and pro-inflammatory cytokines in dengue patients in Western India: a facility-based study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e8709, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Pal, S. K. Dutta, S. Mandal, B. Saha, and A. Tripathi, “Differential clinical symptoms among acute phase Indian patients revealed significant association with dengue viral load and serum IFN-gamma level,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 365–370, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. L. St John, A. P. S. Rathore, B. Raghavan, M.-L. Ng, and S. N. Abraham, “Contributions of mast cells and vasoactive products, leukotrienes and chymase, to dengue virus-induced vascular leakage,” eLife, vol. 2013, no. 2, Article ID e00481, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. O. Pozo-Aguilar, V. Monroy-Martínez, D. Díaz et al., “Evaluation of host and viral factors associated with severe dengue based on the 2009 WHO classification,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 590, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. W.-K. Wang, D.-Y. Chao, C.-L. Kao et al., “High levels of plasma dengue viral load during defervescence in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever: implications for pathogenesis,” Virology, vol. 305, no. 2, pp. 330–338, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. W. Bazer, T. E. Spencer, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, and G. Wu, “Comparative aspects of implantation,” Reproduction, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 195–209, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. E. Spencer, O. Sandra, and E. Wolf, “Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: Insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches,” Reproduction, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 165–179, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Kim, H. Seo, Y. Choi, J. Shim, F. W. Bazer, and H. Ka, “Swine leukocyte antigen-DQ expression and its regulation by interferon-gamma at the maternal-fetal interface in pigs,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 86, no. 2, article no. 43, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. M. Joyce, J. R. Burghardt, R. C. Burghardt, R. N. Hooper, F. W. Bazer, and G. A. Johnson, “Uterine MHC class I molecules and β2-microglobulin are regulated by progesterone and conceptus interferons during pig pregnancy,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 2494–2505, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. J. Yockey, L. Varela, T. Rakib et al., “Vaginal Exposure to Zika Virus during Pregnancy Leads to Fetal Brain Infection,” Cell, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1247–1256.e4, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Bayer, N. J. Lennemann, Y. Ouyang et al., “Type III Interferons Produced by Human Placental Trophoblasts Confer Protection against Zika Virus Infection,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 705–712, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. I. Uçar, T. Ertekin, M. Nisari, D. Ceylan, Ö. Al, and H. Ülger, “The potential teratogenic effects of interferon beta-1a and interferon beta-1b on in vitro embryonic development,” Folia Morphologica (Poland), vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 257–263, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Z. Li, Z. Song, C. Meng, D. Yang, Y. Yang, and J. Peng, “IFN-γ modulates Ly-49 receptors on NK cells in IFN-γ-induced pregnancy failure,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. U. Borbely, J. D. Fontenele-Neto, A. K. Vidsiunas et al., “Ectoplacental cone induces resistance to apoptosis in high doses of interferon (IFN)-γ-treated decidual cells,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. Chistyakova, I. Gazieva, I. Remizova, L. Ustyantseva, V. Lyapunov, and S. Bychkova, “Risk factors vary early preterm birth and perinatal complications after assisted reproductive technology,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 32, pp. 56–61, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Giles, K. Visvanathan, and J. Sasadeusz, “Antiviral therapy for hepatitis B infection during pregnancy and breastfeeding,” Antiviral Therapy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 621–628, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. Boskovic, R. Wide, J. Wolpin, D. J. Bauer, and G. Koren, “The reproductive effects of beta interferon therapy in pregnancy: A Longitudinal Cohort,” Neurology, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 807–811, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Z. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Yang, and J.-P. Peng, “The effect on MHC class II expression and apoptosis in placenta by IFNγ administration,” Contraception, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. G. Chaouat, E. Menu, D. A. Clark, M. Dy, M. Minkowski, and T. G. Wegmann, “Control of fetal survival in CBA x DBA/2 mice by lymphokine therapy,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 447–458, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Yui, M. Garcia-Lloret, T. G. Wegmann, and L. J. Guilbert, “Cytotoxicity of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and gamma-interferon against primary human placental trophoblasts,” Placenta, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 819–835, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. S. Berkowitz, J. A. Hill, C. B. Kurtz, and D. J. Anderson, “Effects of products of activated leukocytes (lymphokines and monokines) on the growth of malignant trophoblast cells in vitro,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 199–203, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Zhang, M. Zhao, F. Jiao et al., “Interferon gamma is involved in apoptosis of trophoblast cells at the maternal-fetal interface following Toxoplasma gondii infection,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 30, pp. e10–e16, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Comba, E. Bastu, O. Dural et al., “Role of inflammatory mediators in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 1467–1474.e1, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. L. Li, J. Tu, Y. Jiang, J. Zhou, and D. J. Schust, “Regulatory T cells decrease invariant natural killer T cell-mediated pregnancy loss in mice,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 613–623, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Okkenhaug, “Signaling by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase family in immune cells,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 31, pp. 675–704, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. H. Guo, A. Samarakoon, B. Vanhaesebroeck, and S. Malarkannan, “The p110δ of PI3K plays a critical role in NK cell terminal maturation and cytokine/chemokine generation,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 10, pp. 2419–2435, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. Saudemont, F. Garçon, H. Yadi et al., “p110γ and p110δ isoforms of phosphoinositide 3-kinase differentially regulate natural killer cell migration in health and disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 14, pp. 5795–5800, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Kieckbusch, E. Balmas, D. A. Hawkes, and F. Colucci, “Disrupted PI3K p110δ Signaling Dysregulates Maternal Immune Cells and Increases Fetal Mortality In Mice,” Cell Reports, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. W.-X. Zhao and J.-H. Lin, “Notch signaling pathway and human placenta,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 447–452, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. K. Jaiswal, V. Agrawal, S. Pamarthy et al., “Notch Signaling in Inflammation-Induced Preterm Labor,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Hao Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.