Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Volume 2018, Article ID 5670238, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5670238
Research Article

Surveillance of Antibiotic Prescribing in Intensive Care Units in Poland

1Department of Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Therapy, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
2Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
3Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
4Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, ICU, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
53rd Department of Cardiology, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
6Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland
7Department of Internal Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
8Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Silesian Hospital, Cieszyn, Poland
9Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Regional Hospital in Poznan, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
10Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
11Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantology, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
12Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
13Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Public Hospital, Ostrów Mazowiecka, Poland
14Faculty of Health Science and Physical Education, The Witelon University of Applied Sciences, Legnica, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Ewa Trejnowska; moc.liamg@akswonjertawe

Received 26 February 2018; Revised 17 June 2018; Accepted 16 July 2018; Published 28 August 2018

Academic Editor: Massimo Girardis

Copyright © 2018 Ewa Trejnowska et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Antibiotic use and microbial resistance in health care-associated infections are increasing globally and causing health care problems. Intensive Care Units (ICUs) represent the heaviest antibiotic burden within hospitals, and sepsis is the second noncardiac cause of mortality in ICUs. Optimizing appropriate antibiotic treatment in the management of the critically ill in ICUs became a major challenge for intensivists. We performed a surveillance study on the antibiotic consumption in 108 Polish ICUs. We determined which classes of antibiotics were most commonly consumed and whether they affected the length of ICU stay and the size and category of the hospital. A total of 292.389 defined daily doses (DDD) and 192.167 patient-days (pd) were identified. Antibiotic consumption ranged from 620 to 3960 DDD/1000 pd. The main antibiotic classes accounted for 59.6% of the total antibiotic consumption and included carbapenems (17.8%), quinolones (14%), cephalosporins (13.7%), penicillins (11.9%), and macrolides (2.2%), respectively, whereas the other antibiotic classes accounted for the remainder (40.4%) and included antifungals (34%), imidazoles (20%), aminoglycosides (18%), glycopeptides (15%), and polymyxins (6%). The most consumed antibiotic classes in Polish ICUs were carbapenems, quinolones, and cephalosporins, respectively. There was no correlation between antibiotic consumption in DDD/1000 patient-days, mean length of ICU stay, size of the hospital, size of the ICU, or the total amount of patient-days. It is crucial that surveillance systems are in place to guide empiric antibiotic treatment and to estimate the burden of resistance. Appropriate use of antibiotics in the ICU should be an important public health care issue.

1. Introduction

Antibiotic use and microbial resistance in health care-associated infections are increasing globally and, in European countries such as Poland, causing health care problems [13]. Increasing antibiotic resistance results in increased morbidity, mortality, and cost of health care [4, 5]. This is a common and alarming problem worldwide and in Poland.

ICU represents the heaviest antibiotic burden within the hospital [6]. ICU is also recognized as a department which creates, disseminates, and amplifies antibiotic resistance, which is important from a microbiological point of view [6, 7].

Data on antimicrobial consumption in Polish ICUs are limited. Poland participated in the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) project, collecting data on antimicrobial consumption in ambulatory care and hospital setting. Unfortunately, the last surveillance report from 2014 contains only data on antimicrobial consumption in ambulatory care. Poland also participated in the European Point Prevalence Survey of Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use (EU-PPS HAI&AU) in 2011 and in 2012 [7]. Deptułą et al. [8] showed a high prevalence of health care-associated infections among patients hospitalized in both adult and pediatric Polish ICUs. They concluded that there is a need for a national infection prevention program in Poland for these groups. Based on the above findings, we performed a surveillance study on the antibiotic consumption in Polish ICUs. We aimed to assess the antibiotic prescribing practices and the annual consumption of antibiotics in adult ICUs.

2. Materials and Methods

Poland currently has 420 adult and 16 pediatric ICUs. All of the ICUs were invited to participate in the surveillance study, which was conducted between April 15, 2014, and June 15, 2015. Survey questionnaires were sent to all ICUs. Requested data included the number of patient-days in the ICU, the mean length of ICU stay, and the antibiotic consumption in 2014. Classification of hospitals and ICUs was obtained from the National Health Fund and included the type of hospital (district hospital, specialist hospital, university hospital, or university hospital with a hematology department), the number of hospital beds, and the number of ICU beds. Data on antibiotic consumption were calculated dividing the amount of active substance by the amount of DDD according to the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistic Methodology. The data received from the participating ICUs in 2014 were then converted and expressed in DDD/1000 patient-days.

The regional Ethical Board reviewed and approved the study protocol. The need for informed consent was waived due to the observational nature of the study.

The majority of Polish ICUs are interdisciplinary. According to the ECDC and EU-PPS HAI&AU protocol [7], the participating ICUs were divided into groups depending on the size of the hospital to which they belonged (<250 beds, 250–500 beds, and >500 beds). University hospitals with and without a hematology department were considered as separate groups.

2.1. Statistical Analysis

Nonparametric rank ANOVA test, Kruskal–Wallis test, post hoc tests (for multiple comparisons), chi-square test, and multipartite tables were used as appropriate for the biggest reliability of assessed relation between selected factors and antibiotic consumption in ICUs.

3. Results

In total, 134 adult ICUs sent their data for analysis. However, queries were sent for any unclear information. If a query remained unanswered, that particular ICU was removed from the study. Finally, data from 108 ICUs (25.7% of all adult ICUs) were included in the study. The information from each ICU was reviewed, and the data were then converted to DDD/1000 patient-days. A total of 292,389 DDD and 192,167 patient-days were included in the analysis.

Antibiotic consumption varied from 620 to 3960 DDD/1000 patient-days, with a median of 1338 DDD/1000 patient-days and a mean of 1520 DDD/1000 patient-days (Figure 1). The differences in the value of DDD/1000 patient-days between various hospitals were not statistically significant (), most likely due to the high variability of results observed within the ICUs.

Figure 1: Mean antibiotic consumption in Polish ICUs (data expressed in DDD/1000 patient-days).

In hospitals with less than 250 beds, 250–500 beds, and more than 500 beds, the mean amount of DDD/1000 patient-days was 1310, 1520, and 1490, respectively. However, the highest consumption (without statistical significance) was observed in university hospitals and university hospitals with a hematology department.

In university hospitals, the mean amount of DDD/1000 patient-days was 1940, whereas in university hospitals with a hematology department, the mean amount of DDD/100 patient-days was 2% lower (Figure 1).

The main antibiotic classes accounted for 59.6% of the total antibiotic consumption. Carbapenems ranged from 1% to 54% of the total antibiotics consumed with a mean of 17.8%, quinolones ranged from 1% to 44% with a mean of 14%, cephalosporins ranged from 1% to 45% with a mean of 13.7%, penicillins ranged from 1% to 58% with a mean of 11.9%, and macrolides ranged from 1% to 15% with a mean of 2.2%, whereas the other antibiotic classes accounted for the remainder (40.4% of total antibiotic consumption). The mean values for this distribution are illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Distribution of total antibiotic consumption in Polish ICUs by main antibiotic classes.

The other antibiotic classes accounted for 40.4% of the total antibiotic consumption and included antifungals (34%), imidazoles (20%), aminoglycosides (18%), glycopeptides (15%), and polymyxins (6%). Details of this comparison are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Distribution of antibiotic consumption in class “others” expressed in percentage of antibiotic consumption. Five of the most often used antibiotics in this group.

Figure 4 displays the distribution of the various classes of antibiotics used in each ICU. Each ICU has been assigned an individual number. The main antibiotic classes are shown in different colours. The size and colour of each column correspond to the amount and type of antibiotic class used. The ICUs are presented in order of decreasing antibiotic use.

Figure 4: Antibiotic classes used in each of the 108 ICUs participating in the study. ICUs are presented on the X-axis in the order of decreasing antibiotic use.

The differences in the distribution of antibiotic classes between ICUs were not statistically significant, except for macrolides and third-generation cephalosporins, which differed significantly between hospitals with more than 500 beds and university hospitals ( and , resp.).

The most commonly used antibiotics expressed as a percentage of total antibiotic consumption were meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin (19.6%) (meropenem 9.9% and imipenem/cilastatin 9.7%), fluconazole (13.3%), ciprofloxacin (12.2%), metronidazole (7.7%), ceftriaxone (5.8%), and vancomycin (5.4%).

The mean length of ICU stay in Poland ranged from 4.8 days to 35 days with a mean of 11.4 days. There was no correlation between mean length of ICU stay, size of the hospital, size of ICU, antibiotic consumption in DDD/1000 patient-days, and the total amount of patient-days.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first surveillance study investigating the antibiotic prescribing practices and the annual consumption of antibiotics in adult ICUs in Poland. 108 ICUs took part in the study, which is 25.7% of all ICUs in Poland. Our study shows that the three classes of antibiotics most consumed in Polish ICUs are the carbapenems, quinolones, and cephalosporins.

In addition, we found a high annual antibiotic prescribing rate and a substantial variation in antibiotic consumption between the ICUs. The antibiotic consumption was not dependent on the hospital size, type, or length of ICU stay.

Similar studies on the annual consumption of antibiotics in ICUs were also conducted in other European countries: in Germany, the SARI Surveillance System [9] and in Sweden, the ICU-STRAMA [10]. In comparison with these studies, in Poland, the mean annual antibiotic consumption reached 1520 DDD per 1000 patient-days, which is higher compared to Germany (1305 DDD/1000 pd in the SARI Surveillance System) [9] or Sweden (1147 DDD/1000 pd in the ICU-STRAMA report) [10]. In our study, antibiotic consumption in the ICUs ranged from 620 to 3960 DDD/1000 patient-days. This heterogeneity was also observed in a study including 29 Swedish ICUs, where antibiotic consumption ranged from 605 to 2134 DDD/1000 pd [10], and in a German SARI Surveillance System where antibiotic consumption varied from 463 to 2216 DDD/1000 pd [9]. However, the maximum annual antibiotic consumption in Sweden was similar to that found in the German study (2134 DDD/1000 pd versus 2216 DDD/1000 pd) [10], while in our study the consumption was higher, reaching 3960 DDD/1000 pd.

Our study revealed the extensive use of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin which are used most frequently (17.8%), followed by fluconazole (13.3%), ciprofloxacin (12.2%), metronidazole (7.7%), ceftriaxone (5.8%), and vancomycin (5.4%).

According to the ECDC Surveillance Report on antimicrobial consumption during the period 2008–2012 in Europe, the most frequently consumed class of antibiotics was penicillins, followed by cephalosporin and quinolones [2]. In our study, cephalosporins were consumed 25% less often (13.7% versus 19%) and macrolides four times less often, when compared to the data from the SARI study [9]. The consumption of carbapenems in Poland was 25% higher in comparison with other countries in northern Europe [9]. The Polish Severe Sepsis Registry [11] showed that the most frequent cause of septic shock in patients admitted to the ICU was an intra-abdominal infection; hence, there is a necessity of treating Gram-negative bacterial flora [12].

In our study, the most common antifungal drug used in Polish ICUs was fluconazole, accounting for 97% of all the antifungal drugs. The reason for such high consumptions of fluconazole is multifarious. Therapeutic management in the prevention and treatment of fungal infections in Poland, as in other countries, is obliged to rely on European [13] or American guidelines [14]. However, in Polish ICUs, usage of antifungal drugs is based on the presence of risk factors for systemic fungal infections-Candida score [15], the respiratory culture result, or because of long-lasting antibiotic therapy. Due to the fact that it is used as prophylaxis for a fungal infection, it is easier to implement a cheaper therapy with the use of fluconazole. However, fluconazole can be successfully used in hospitals because the majority of infections are Candida albicans or Candida parapsilosis [7]. Echinocandins are left for targeted therapy or for patients in whom there are indications; for example, they have a multisite colonization of Candida nonalbicans [16]. The study showed for the first time how often fluconazole is used and indicates the need to increase the awareness in the field of therapy for fungal infections. This is a very high figure when compared to the 2012 ECDC surveillance on antimicrobial consumption in Europe. This surveillance has also identified 11 European countries (61%), where fluconazole alone accounted for more than 50% of the total antifungal drugs consumed. Poland seems to be a country with one of the highest consumptions of fluconazole [2]. Paying attention to such high consumptions of fluconazole is one of the greatest achievements of this study.

Excessive use of carbapenems leads to higher antimicrobial resistance which results in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the ICU. This is an unsettling phenomenon which occurs in other countries in eastern and southern Europe. These observations are consistent with the data published in the annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) [17]. The results presented in this report are based on antimicrobial resistance data from invasive isolates reported to EARS-Net by 30 European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) countries in 2017 (data referring to 2016). As in previous years, the antimicrobial resistance situation in Europe displays wide variations depending on the bacterial species, antimicrobial group, and geographical region. For several bacterial species-antimicrobial group combinations, a north-to-south gradient and a west-to-east gradient are evident in Europe. In general, lower resistance percentages were reported by countries in the north, while higher percentages were reported in the south and east of Europe. These differences are most likely related to variations in antimicrobial use, infection prevention, and control practices, and dissimilarities in diagnostic and health care utilization patterns in the countries [17].

The dynamics of antibiotic resistance are multifarious. Antibiotic usage in the animal and plant industry is a major contributor to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [18]. Within the hospital, the ICU represents the heaviest antibiotic burden [6]. In the ICU setting itself, causes of AMR may conveniently be categorized by procedure-related, management-related, and antibiotic-related factors. Procedure-related factors include central venous catheters [18, 19], and endotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation [16]. Management-related factors include poor adherence to infection control policy, lack of microbiological surveillance with delayed/failed recognition of resistant isolates [18, 20], patient overcrowding [21], understaffing, and implicit spread of AMR through human vectors [22], prolonged ICU length of stay [18, 23], and pre-infection with resistant organisms at the time of ICU admission [18, 23]. Antibiotic-related factors are related to the appropriateness and duration of treatment. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, often as a first step in the treatment of patients with suspected infections, has a documented relationship with the development of antibiotic resistance [18, 23, 24]. Similarly, the ease of access to certain antibiotic classes, either through their availability over-the-counter in certain countries (e.g., penicillins and fluoroquinolones) or through unfounded clinician concerns of suspected bacterial infection, leads to documented AMR, although causation proves difficult at an individual patient level [18].

Variability in antibiotic prescribing cannot be explained only by differences in the epidemiology of the community and hospital infections or antimicrobial resistance patterns. Socioeconomic and sociocultural factors, as well as the way in which health care is funded or reimbursed, are likely to influence antibiotic use [25, 26].

Mean length of ICU stay in our study ranged from 4.8 to 35 days with a mean of 11.4 days. This is much longer than the mean length of ICU stay in the SARI study in Germany (4.8 days) [9]. This may be due to the different severity of patients admitted to the Polish ICUs. In the Polish Severe Sepsis Registry, 4999 patients were registered during the 7-year period (2003–2009) [27]. These patients were admitted to the ICU in critical condition, and the majority of them (89%) had a dysfunction of three or more organs. The APACHE II score on admission was 26 points. In the United States, only 36% of identified patients were mechanically ventilated at some point during their ICU stay [28]. In Poland, the majority of patients (89%) admitted to the ICU were intubated [27].

One of the reasons for the severe condition of patients admitted to Polish ICUs is the lower accessibility to intensive care beds, which is three times smaller in comparison to other European countries [28]. In Western European countries, the highest number of intensive care beds for adults is in Germany—24 beds per 100 000 inhabitants [29]. In the United States, this number was 28 in 2007 [30, 31]. In Poland, the number of intensive care beds per 100 000 inhabitants is 7.1 [28]. Less available beds are associated with a delayed admission to the ICU, and as a consequence, more organ dysfunction.

This study has some important limitations. Participation in the surveillance study was voluntary, and therefore selection bias cannot be excluded. It is possible, that some ICUs encountering higher antibiotic consumption and higher resistance rates may be aware of the problem and did not wish to take part in the surveillance.

Our study describes the amount of antibiotic consumption in Polish ICUs. The wide variation in consumption between individual hospitals suggests that there is a potential for quality improvement and benchmarking. We also observed differences between our data and similar data from other countries. Results from such assessments should be distributed to both politicians and professionals in the country. It is essential to perform regular assessments of antibiotic consumption and antibiotic resistance in Polish ICUs. Updating international guidelines for appropriate antibiotic use and implementing these guidelines (e.g., including internationally agreed-upon stewardship programs) is one possibility.

Surveillance on continuous antibiotic consumption and evaluation of prescribing patterns with feedback is particularly important. Surveillance on antibiotic consumption is one of the main instruments for improving rational antibiotic use in ICUs at the regional and national level.

5. Conclusion

The three classes of antibiotics most consumed in Polish ICUs are the carbapenems, quinolones, and cephalosporins. The consumption of these 3 classes of antibiotics should be limited and controlled in ICUs, considering the high risk of antimicrobial resistance that involves their use.

Further research is required to determine the appropriate use of antibiotics in the ICU and should be an important safety and health care issue worldwide.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Ewa Trejnowska designed the study and drafted the manuscript. Aleksander Deptuła, Piotr Knapik, Miłosz Jankowski, Grażyna Durek, and Paul Armatowicz reviewed and approved the manuscript. Magda Tarczyńska-Słomian, Agnieszka Misiewska-Kaczur, Barbara Tamowicz, Jakub Śmiechowicz, Remigiusz Antończyk, and Wiktor Sułkowski contributed to the data collection. All authors approved the final version.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Stanisław Aptacy, Dorota Arszyńska Łopatka, Alicja Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Elżbieta Baum, Elżbieta Bernat-Oleksińska, Józef Bojko, Szczepan Bołdys, Krzysztof Borzędzki, Roman Brachaczek, Marek Ciesielski, Bożenia Cieślak-Witkowska, Mirosław Czuczwar, Danuta Dąbrowska Parfianowicz, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Paweł Dobosz, Urszula Dziurewicz, Maciej Fajzetel, Janusz Fuchs, Waldemar Gardias, Wojciech Gaszyński, Maciej Gawor, Marta Gnatowska-Kowalczyk, Tamara Góralewska-Paszkowska, Stanisław Grzybowski, Wiesław Gucwa, Hanna Janaszek-Stawska, Agnieszka Janowska, Mariusz Jednakiewicz, Witold Kandziora, Marek Karasek, Elżbieta Karnaś, Aleksandra Karoż-Gutowska, Tadeusz Kasza, Marcin Kazimierski, Jolanta Kobierowska, Bernadetta Kołodziejczyk, Romuald Komandowski, Jarosław Kopertowski, Hanna Kosela-Kitowska, Barbara Kosiniak, Marek Koszyka, Zyta Kotłowska, Joanna Kowalska, Tomasz Kowalski, Dariusz Kowszewicz, Magda Krajewska, Rafał Kraus, Antonii Kręcichwost, Marcin Kubecki, Andrzej Kubler, Jacek Kulesza, Anna Kunsdorf-Wnuk, Elżbieta Kurmin-Gryz, Wiesław Lis, Jacek Majewski, Andrzej Małek, Zdzisław Małyszka, Ewa Maziarz-Lubionka, Ilona Mędzin, Waldemar Micewski, Bogdan Mieszkowski, Adam Mikstacki, Jolanta Milewska, Barbara Miłkowska, Tomasz Mosiełek, Wojciech Mudyna, Wiesław Nawłatyna, Jacek Nowak, Ewa Nowak, Marzanna Nykiel, Barbara Ochyra, Bogdan Osowiecki, Andrzej Ozimirski, Paweł Panieński, Ireneusz Pasztelan, Mariusz Piechota, Andrzej Piegza, Tomasz Pniak, Janusz Polański, Włodzimierz Rolecki, Jan Romaniuk, Stanisław Rzymski, Roman Sadowski, Artur Saladra, Ewa Seredziuk-Łada, Joanna Siemienkowicz, Krzysztof Sitko, Małgorzata Składanowska, Barbara Skoczylas-Stoba, Jerzy Szczyrzyca, Andrzej Szurmiak, Bożena Szurmiej, Bożenia Śliwa-Rak, Bernadet Tułaza, Izabela Wencel, Dariusz Węgrzyn, Paweł Wichłacz, Krzysztof Winkler, Romana Wojtowicz, Jan Wożniak, Mieczysława Wróbel-Wiórek, Zbigniew Wyrwas, Jarosław Zagożdżon, and Izabela Zółek.

References

  1. J. F. John and L. L. Steed, “Antibiotic resistance: a clinical danger beyond 2013,” Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 54–58, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2012, ECDC, Stockholm, Sweden, 2014, http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/antimicrobial-resistance-surveillanceeurope-2012.pdf.
  3. World Health Organization, Antimicrobial Resistance Global Report on Surveillance: 2014 Summary, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014, http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112642/1/9789241564748_eng.pdf.
  4. S. P. Kuster, C. Ruef, B. Ledergerber et al., “Quantitative antibiotic use in hospitals: comparison of measurements, literature review, and recommendations for a standard of reporting,” Infection, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 549–559, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. L. Maragakis, E. N. Perencevich, and S. E. Cosgrove, “Clinical and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance,” Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 751–763, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Brusselaers, D. Vogelaers, and S. Blot, “The rising problem of antimicrobial resistance in intensive care unit,” Ann Intensive Care, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 47, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. The European Point Prevalence Survey of Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use (EU-PPS HAI&AU) in 2011 and in 2012,” 2012, https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publications/healthcare-associated-infections-antimicrobial-use-PPS.pdf.
  8. A. Deptułą, E. Trejnowska, T. Ozorowski, and W. Hryniewicz, “Risk factors of healthcare associated infections in light of two-year Polish experience with ECDC point prevalence survey of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial use in Poland,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 310–315, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Meyer, P. Gastmeier, M. Deja, and F. Schwab, “Antibiotic consumption and resistance: data from Europe and Germany,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 303, no. 6-7, pp. 388–395, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Hanberger, M. Erlandsson, L. G. Burman et al., “High antibiotic susceptibility among bacterial pathogens in Swedish ICUs. Report from a nationwide surveillance program using TA90 as a novel index of susceptibility,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Kübler, E. Mayzner-Zawadzka, G. Durek, W. Gaszyński, A. Nestorowicz, and E. Karpel, “Prevalence and incidence of severe sepsis in intensive therapy units in Poland,” Borgis-Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia, vol. 2, pp. 90–94, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. W. Dąbrowski, E. Kotlinska-Hasiec, A. Jaroszynski et al., “Intra-abdominal pressure correlates with extracellular water content,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0122193, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. O. A. Cornely, M. Bassetti, T. Calandra et al., “ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 18, no. S7, pp. 19–37, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. G. Pappas, C. A. Kauffman, D. Andes et al., “Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 503–535, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Juneja, P. Nasa, O. Singh, Y. Javeri, and S. Garg, “Candida score: a predictor of mortality in patients with candidemia,” Critical Care, vol. 16, no. S3, p. P17, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Deptuła, E. Trejnowska, G. Dubiel et al., “Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in Polish adult intensive care units: summary data from the ECDC European point prevalence survey of hospital-associated infections and antimicrobial use in Poland 2012–2014,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. “Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe Annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net),” 2016, http://www.ecdc.europa.eu, https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/AMR-surveillance-Europe-2016.pdf.
  18. Y. Z. Zhang and S. Singh, “Antibiotic stewardship programmes in intensive care units: why, how, and where are they leading us,” World Journal of Critical Care Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Deptuła, E. Trejnowska, G. Dubiel, M. Wanke-Rytt, M. Deptuła, and W. Hryniewicz, “Healthcare associated bloodstream infections in Polish hospitals: prevalence, epidemiology and microbiology-summary data from the ECDC Point Prevalence Survey of Healthcare Associated Infections 2012-2015,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 565–570, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Alfieri, K. Ramotar, P. Armstrong et al., “Two consecutive outbreaks of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Xanthomonas maltophilia) in an intensive-care unit defined by restriction fragment-length polymorphism typing,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 553–556, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Harbarth, P. Sudre, S. Dharan, M. Cadenas, and D. Pittet, “Outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae related to understaffing, overcrowding, and poor hygiene practices,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 20, pp. 598–603, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. F. Vicca, “Nursing staff workload as a determinant of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spread in an adult intensive therapy unit,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 109–113, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Vogelaers, D. De Bels, F. Forêt et al., “Patterns of antimicrobial therapy in severe nosocomial infections: empiric choices, proportion of appropriate therapy, and adaptation rates–a multicentre, observational survey in critically ill patients,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 375–381, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. H. Kollef, P. Silver, D. M. Murphy, and E. Trovillion, “The effect of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia in determining patient mortality,” Chest, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1655–1662, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. E. Hulscher, R. P. Grol, and J. W. van der Meer, “Antibiotic prescribing in hospitals: a social and behavioral scientific approach,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 167–175, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Kourlaba, E. Gkrania-Klotsas, E. Kourkouni, G. Mavrogeorgos, and T. E. Zaoutis, “Antibiotic prescribing and expenditures in outpatient adults in Greece, 2010 to 2013: evidence from realworld practice,” Eurosurveillance, vol. 21, no. 26, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Kübler, B. Adamik, G. Durek et al., “Results of the severe sepsis registry in intensive care units in Poland from 2003−2009,” Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Piechota and M. Piechota, “Adult intensive therapy services contracted by the National Health Fund in 2012,” Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 123–129, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  29. H. Wunsch, D. C. Angus, D. Harrison et al., “Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2787–2793, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Valentin and P. Ferdinande, “ESICM Working Group on Quality Improvement. Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1575–1587, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. F. Dosta, T. P. MacLaughlin, S. H. Mody, and C. T. Piech, “Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1266–1271, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus