Research Article
Detection and Quantification of Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Anadara subcrenata in the Zhoushan Archipelago
Table 5
Prevalence of contamination of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Anadara subcrenata in different seasons.
| Seasons | Number of samples | No. of positive samples | Positive rate (%) | Number of samples with pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus (MPN/g) | Densities of tdh or tlh positive samples (MPN/g) | None detected | <10 | 10–102 | 102–103 | >103 | Median | Min–max |
| Spring | 56 | 10 | 17.85 | 46 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.3 | 0.92–240 | Summer | 98 | 8 | 8.16 | 90 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.6 | 0.36–210 | Autumn | 69 | 7 | 10.14 | 58 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9.2 | 3.00–23.00 | Winter | 64 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Total | 265 | 25 | 9.43 | 240 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6.4 | 0.30–240 |
|
|
The positive rate of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus from different seasons was significantly different ( ). |