Abstract

An ideal topological space is a triplet (, , ), where is a nonempty set, is a topology on , and is an ideal of subsets of . In this paper, we introduce -perfect, -perfect, and -perfect sets in ideal spaces and study their properties. We obtained a characterization for compatible ideals via -perfect sets. Also, we obtain a generalized topology via ideals which is finer than using -perfect sets on a finite set.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

The contributions of Hamlett and Jankovic [14] in ideal topological spaces initiated the generalization of some important properties in general topology via topological ideals. The properties like decomposition of continuity, separation axioms, connectedness, compactness, and resolvability [59] have been generalized using the concept of ideals in topological spaces.

By a space , we mean a topological space with a topology defined on on which no separation axioms are assumed unless otherwise explicitly stated. For a given point in a space , the system of open neighborhoods of is denoted by . For a given subset of a space and are used to denote the closure of and interior of , respectively, with respect to the topology.

A nonempty collection of subsets of a set is said to be an ideal on , if it satisfies the following two conditions: (i) If and , then ; (ii) If and , then . An ideal topological space (or ideal space) means a topological space with an ideal defined on . Let be a topological space with an ideal defined on . Then for any subset of for every is called the local function of with respect to and . If there is no ambiguity, we will write or simply for . Also, defines a Kuratowski closure operator for the topology (or simply ) which is finer than . An ideal on a space is said to be codense ideal if and only if . is always a proper subset of . Also, if and only if the ideal is codense.

Lemma 1 ([see 12]). Let be a space with and being ideals on , and let and be two subsets on . Then(i); (ii); (iii) ( is a closed subset of );(iv); (v); (vi);(vii)for every .

Definition 2 (see [3]). Let be a space with an ideal on . One says that the topology is compatible with the ideal , denoted by , if the following holds, for every : if for every , there exists a such that , then .

Definition 3. A subset of an ideal space is said to be(i)-closed [3] if ,(ii)*-dense-in-itself [10] if ,(iii)-open [11] if ,(iv)almost -open [12] if ,(v)-dense [7] if ,(vi)almost strong --open [13] if ,(vii)*-perfect [10] if ,(viii)regular -closed [14] if ,(ix)an -set [15] if .

Theorem 4 ([3]). Let be a space with an ideal on . Then the following are equivalent.(i).(ii)If has a cover of open sets each of whose intersection with is , then is in .(iii)For every , .(iv)For every , .(v)For every -closed subset .(vi)For every , if contains no nonempty subset with , then .

2. -Perfect, -Perfect, and -Perfect Sets

In this section, we define three collections of subsets , and in an ideal space and study some of their properties.

Definition 5. Let be an ideal topological space. A subset of is said to be(i)-perfect if ,(ii)-perfect if ,(iii)-perfect if is both -perfect and -perfect. The collection of -perfect sets, -perfect sets, and -perfect sets in is denoted by , , and , respectively.

Remark 6. (i) If , then
(ii) If , then .
(iii) If , then (by Theorem 4(iv)).

Remark 7. Every *-perfect set is both -perfect and -perfect (and hence -perfect). In Proposition 15, we proved that every members of an ideal is both -perfect and -perfect (and hence -perfect). But any nonempty member of an ideal is not a *-perfect set. Hence -perfect and -perfect sets (and hence -perfect sets) need not be *-perfect.

Proposition 8. If a subset of an ideal space is -perfect, then .

Proof. Since is both -perfect and -perfect, and . By the finite additive property of ideals, . Hence .

Proposition 9. In an ideal space , every -closed set is -perfect.

Proof. Let be a -closed set. Therefore, . Hence . Therefore, is an -perfect set.

Corollary 10. In an ideal space ,(i) and are -perfect sets,(ii)every -closed set is -perfect,(iii)for any subset of an ideal topological space are -perfect sets,(iv)every regular--closed set is -perfect.

Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 9.

The following example shows that the converses of Proposition 9 and Corollary 10 are not true.

Example 11. Let be an ideal space with , , and . The set is -perfect set which is not a -closed set and hence not a regular--closed set.

Proposition 12. If a subset of an ideal topological space is such that , then is -perfect.

Proof. Since . Then and . Hence is both an -perfect and -perfect set.

Corollary 13. Let be a subset of an ideal space . Consider the following.(i)If , then every subset of is a -perfect set.(ii)If is -perfect, then is -perfect.(iii)If is an -perfect set, then is a -perfect set.(iv)If is -perfect, then is a -perfect set.

Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 12.

Corollary 14. Let be a space with an ideal on such that . Then for every ,(i)if , then is -perfect;(ii) is -perfect;(iii)if contains nonempty subset with , then is -perfect.

Proof. Follows from Theorem 4 and Proposition 12.

Proposition 15. In an ideal space , every *-dense-in-itself set is an -perfect set.

Proof. Let be a *-dense-in-itself set of . Then . Therefore, . Hence is an -perfect set.

Corollary 16. In an ideal space ,(i)every -dense set is -perfect,(ii)every -open set is -perfect,(iii)every almost strong -I-open set is -perfect,(iv)every almost -open set is -perfect,(v)every regular--closed set is -perfect,(vi)every -set is -perfect.

Proof. Since all the above sets are *-dense-in-itself, by Proposition 15, these sets are -perfect.

Remark 17. The members of the ideal of an ideal space are -perfect, but the nonempty members of the ideal are not *-dense-in-itself. Therefore, the converses of the above Corollary and Proposition 15 need not to be true.

Proposition 18. In an ideal space ,(i)empty set is an  -perfect set,(ii)  is an  -perfect set if the ideal is codense.

Proof. (i) Since , the empty set is an -perfect set. (ii) We know that if and only if the ideal is codense. Then . Hence the result follows.

3. Main Results

In this section, we prove that finite union and intersection of -perfect sets are again -perfect set. Using these results, we obtain a new topology for the finite topological spaces which is finer than -topology.

In Ideal spaces, usually implies . We observe that there are some sets and such that but .

Example 19. Let be an ideal space with , , . Here the sets and are such that , but .

Proposition 20. Let be an ideal space. Let and be two subsets of such that and ; then(i)  is -perfect if is -perfect;(ii)  is -perfect if is -perfect.

Proof. (i) Let be an -perfect set. Then . Now, . By heredity property of ideals, . Hence is -perfect.
(ii) Let be an -perfect set. Then . Now, . By heredity property of ideals, . Hence is -perfect.

Corollary 21. Let be an ideal space. Let and be two subsets of such that ; then(i) is -perfect if is -perfect,(ii) is -perfect if is -perfect.

Proof. Since , . Hence . Therefore, the result follows from Proposition 20.

Proposition 22. Let be a subset of an ideal topological space such that is -perfect set and is -perfect; then both and are -perfect.

Proof. Since is -perfect, . By Lemma 1(vii), for every , . Therefore, . This implies . Therefore, we have with . By Proposition 20, is -perfect if is -perfect and is -perfect if is -perfect set. Hence is -perfect and is -perfect.

Proposition 23. If a subset of an ideal topological space is -perfect set and is -perfect, then is -perfect.

Proof. Since is -perfect, . By Lemma 1, for every , . Therefore, . This implies . Therefore, we have with . By Proposition 20, is -perfect if is -perfect set. Hence is -perfect.

Proposition 24. If and are -perfect sets, then is an -perfect set.

Proof. Let and be -perfect sets. Then and . By finite additive property of ideals, . Since , by heredity property . Hence . This proves the result.

Corollary 25. Finite union of -perfect sets is an -perfect set.

Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 24.

Proposition 26. If and are -perfect sets, then is an -perfect set.

Proof. Since and are -perfect sets, and . Hence by finite additive property of ideals, . Since , by heredity property . This proves that is an -perfect set.

Corollary 27. Finite union of -perfect sets is an -perfect sets.

Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 26.

Proposition 28. If and are -perfect sets, then is an -perfect set.

Proof. Suppose that and are -perfect sets. Then and . By finite additive property of ideals, . Since , by heredity property . Also . This proves the result.

Corollary 29. Finite intersection of -perfect sets is an -perfect set.

Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 28.

Proposition 30. Finite union of -perfect sets is a -perfect set.

Proof. From Corollaries 27 and 29, finite union of -perfect sets is a -perfect set.

Proposition 31. If is an ideal topological space with being finite, then the collection is a topology which is finer than the topology of -closed sets.

Proof. By Corollary 10, and are -perfect sets. By Corollary 25, finite union of -perfect sets is an -perfect set, and by Corollary 29, finite intersection of -perfect sets is -perfect. Hence the collection is a topology if is finite. Also, by Proposition 9 every -closed set is an -perfect set. Hence the topology is finer than the topology of -closed sets if is finite.

Proposition 32. In an ideal space , .

Proof. The proof follows from Propositions 9 and 12.

The following example shows that .

Example 33. Let be an ideal space with , , and . The collection of -closed sets is and .

Now, -closed sets.

Proposition 34. Let be an ideal space and . The set is -perfect if and only if in implies that .

Proof. Assume that is an -perfect set. Then . By heredity property of ideals, every set in is also in . Conversely assume that in implies that . Since is a subset of itself, by assumption . Hence is -perfect.

Proposition 35. Let be an ideal space and . The set is -perfect if and only if in implies that .

Proof. Assume that is an -perfect set. Then . By heredity property of ideals, every set in is also in . Conversely, assume that in implies that . Since is a subset of itself, by assumption . Hence is -perfect.

Proposition 36. Let be a topological space and . Let and be two ideals on with . Then is -perfect with respect to if it is -perfect with respect to .

Proof. Since by Lemma 1(ii) Let be -perfect with respect to . Then . Also, . Hence by heredity property of ideals, . Therefore is -perfect with respect to .

Theorem 37. Let be a space with an ideal on . Then the following are equivalent.(i). (ii)If has a cover of open sets each of whose intersection with is , then is in .(iii)If , then .(iv)If , then .(v)If and is -perfect set, then .(vi)For every -closed subset .(vii)For every , if contains no nonempty subset with , then .

Proof. To prove this theorem, it is enough to prove (iv) (v) (vi). Others follow from Theorem 4. (iv) (v) follows from Proposition 8. Suppose that . Since , by heredity property . Hence (v) (vi).

4. -Topology

By Corollary 10 and Proposition 28, we observe that the collection satisfies the conditions of being a basis for some topology and it will be called as . We define on a nonempty set . Clearly, is a topology if the set is finite. The members of the collection will be called -open sets. If there is no confusion about the topology and the ideal , then we call as -topology when is finite.

Definition 38. A subset of an ideal topological space is said to be -closed if it is a complement of an -open set.

Definition 39. Let be a subset of an ideal topological space . One defines -interior of the set as the largest -open set contained in .One will denote -interior of a set by .

Definition 40. Let be a subset of an ideal topological space . A point is said to be an -interior point of the set if there exists an -open set of such that .

Definition 41. Let be an ideal space and . One defines -neighborhood of as an -open set containing . One denotes the set of all -neighborhoods of by .

Proposition 42. In an ideal space , every -open set is an -open set.

Proof. Let be a -open set. Therefore, is a -closed set. That implies that is an -closed set. Hence is an -open set.

Corollary 43. The topology on a finite set is finer than the topology .

Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 42.

Corollary 44. For any subset of an ideal topological space , is an -open set.

Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 42.

Remark 45. (i) Since every open set is an -open set, every neighborhood of a point is an -neighborhood of .
(ii) If is an interior point of a subset of , then is an -interior point of .
(iii) From (ii), we have , where denotes interior of with respect to the topology .

Theorem 46. Let and be subsets of an ideal space with being finite. Then the following properties hold.(i) and is an -open set.(ii) is the largest -open set of contained in .(iii) is -open if and only if .(iv). (v)If , then .

Proof. The proof follows from Definitions 39, 40, and 41.

Definition 47. Let be a subset of an ideal topological space . One defines -closure of the set as the smallest -closed set containing . One will denote -closure of a set by .

Remark 48. For any subset of an ideal topological space , .

Theorem 49. Let and be subsets of an ideal space where is finite. Then the following properties hold:(i) and is -closed set.(ii) is -closed if and only if (iii)(iv)If , then .

Proof. The proof follows from Definition 47.

Theorem 50. Let be a subset of an ideal space . Then the following properties hold:(i);(ii).

Proof. The proof follows from Definitions 38, 39, and 47.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.