Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Volume 2017, Article ID 5260305, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5260305
Review Article

Advanced Functional Tumor Imaging and Precision Nuclear Medicine Enabled by Digital PET Technologies

Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Rm. 430, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Michael V. Knopp; ude.uso@61.pponk

Received 25 February 2017; Accepted 11 April 2017; Published 16 May 2017

Academic Editor: Shasha Li

Copyright © 2017 Chadwick L. Wright et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [10 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Antoine Verger, and Eric Guedj, “The renaissance of functional 18F-FDG PET brain activation imaging,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 45, no. 13, pp. 2338–2341, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Éric Guedj, “L’imagerie moléculaire en médecine nucléaire, du biomarqueur au théranostique,” Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine, vol. 202, no. 7, pp. 1501–1509, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tom Konert, Jeroen B. van de Kamer, Jan-Jakob Sonke, and Wouter V. Vogel, “The developing role of FDG PET imaging for prognostication and radiotherapy target volume delineation in non-small cell lung cancer,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 10, pp. S2508–S2521, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jun Zhang, Piotr Maniawski, and Michael V. Knopp, “Performance evaluation of the next generation solid-state digital photon counting PET/CT system,” EJNMMI Research, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nicoletta Urbano, Manuel Scimeca, Orazio Schillaci, and Elena Bonanno, “Nuclear medicine and anatomic pathology in personalized medicine: A challenging alliance,” Personalized Medicine, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 457–459, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Chadwick L. Wright, Michael V. Knopp, Iman R. Washington, and Aashish D. Bhatt, “Emerging Opportunities for Digital PET/CT to Advance Locoregional Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer,” Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Michael Peter Jones, George Hruby, Ur Metser, Swetha Sridharan, Anne Capp, Mahesh Kumar, Sarah Gallagher, Natalie Rutherford, Carl Holder, Christopher Oldmeadow, and Jarad Martin, “FDG-PET parameters predict for recurrence in anal cancer – results from a prospective, multicentre clinical trial,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 14, no. 1, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Luigi Landini, “The Future of Medical Imaging,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 24, no. 46, pp. 5487–5488, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Francisco Fuentes-Ocampo, Diego Alfonso López-Mora, Albert Flotats, Gabriela Paillahueque, Valle Camacho, Joan Duch, Alejandro Fernández, Anna Domènech, Montserrat Estorch, and Ignasi Carrió, “Digital vs. analog PET/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Diego Alfonso López-Mora, Albert Flotats, Francisco Fuentes-Ocampo, Valle Camacho, Alejandro Fernández, Agustí Ruiz, Joan Duch, Marina Sizova, Anna Domènech, Montserrat Estorch, and Ignasi Carrió, “Comparison of image quality and lesion detection between digital and analog PET/CT,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar