Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging

Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Imaging Diagnostic and Pathology in the Management of Oncological-Patients

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 8659826 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8659826

Jing Yang, Sha Zhu, Fuwen Pang, Miao Xu, Yiting Dong, Jianqi Hao, Xuelei Ma, "Functional Parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Primary Testicular Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma", Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, vol. 2018, Article ID 8659826, 7 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8659826

Functional Parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Primary Testicular Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Academic Editor: Elena Bonanno
Received11 Apr 2018
Revised21 Jul 2018
Accepted03 Sep 2018
Published27 Sep 2018

Abstract

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), a hybrid imaging technique that simultaneously provides functional and anatomical information, has been reported to be useful in lymphoma. The present study was to evaluate the functional parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 5095 patients with lymphoma who treated at West China Hospital between March 2003 and January 2017, and selected patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and subsequently biopsy confirmed the invasion of testis with DLBCL. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake values (SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the patients were measured. We evaluated the characteristics of 18F-FDG PET/CT in this population. Six patients ranged in age from 37 to 73 years (median age, 58 years) were included in the analysis. The mean SUVmax was 11.09 and varied between 7.20 and 19.75; mean SUVpeak was 9.56 and ranged between 6.79 and 14.39. In addition, mean MTV 42% was 18.4 and varied between 1.3 and 61.6; mean MTV 2.5 was 34.7 and varied significantly between 1.6 and 141.9. With regard to TLG, mean TLG 42% was 168.906 and ranged from 7.514 to 687.004, while mean TLG 2.5 was 253.972 and ranged from 8.400 to 1127.802. In conclusion, 18F-FDG PET/CT scan is a useful tool in patients with testicular DLBCL. SUV, MTV, and TLG may vary a lot in different patients. SUVmax of testicular DLBCL lesion is relatively higher than that of normal testis. Also, we provided a set of MTV and TLG data and firstly showed their significant correlation with overall survival, which indicated a potential prognostic value of MTV and TLG. However, studies with larger population are needed to confirm these findings.

1. Introduction

Testicular lymphoma is a rare but aggressive form of extranodal lymphoma, accounting for 3–9% of testicular cancers and 1-2% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [1, 2]. In spite of the low overall incidence, testicular lymphoma is the most common testicular malignancy in men over 60 [2]. Testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histological subtype, accounting for about 80% to 98% of all cases [3]. Although radical inguinal orchiectomy is recommended in view of histological evaluation, invasiveness often hinders its wider adoption [4]. Other diagnostic methods include testicular ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), routine blood test, lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow biopsy, and lumbar puncture [5].

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a hybrid imaging technique that simultaneously provides functional and anatomical information. 18F-FDG PET/CT is important in biomedical research and clinical diagnostics, and its application in lymphoma has already been reported [6, 7]. There are several parameters being repeatedly discussed in recent studies, including maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake values (SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), since they are believed to play important roles in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with lymphoma [810]. Therefore, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging, response evaluation, and prognosis of lymphoma.

However, the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT among patients with testicular DLBCL has still not been well established. In this study, we reported 6 patients with testicular DLBCL who had performed 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and discussed the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in this population at the same time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 5095 patients with lymphoma. All patients were treated at West China Hospital between March 2003 and January 2015. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) 18F-FDG PET/CT findings before receiving orchiectomy were present and (2) subsequent biopsy confirmed the invasion of testis with DLBCL. Patients’ characteristics including the histological type, Ann Arbor stage, International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, NCCN IPI score, ECOG performance status, B symptom, metastatic sites, and treatment were extracted. This study was approved by the Ethics Administration Office of West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

2.2. 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging

Standard whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed using a Gemini GXL PET/CT scanner (Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Fasting for at least 6 hours was required before the examination, and the blood glucose level was measured immediately before the administration of 18F-FDG. The PET/CT scan would be rescheduled if the blood glucose level was >150 mg/dL. Approximately 5 MBq of 18F-FDG per kilogram of body weight was administered intravenously, and the patients rested in a quiet, dark environment for approximately 60 minutes before scanning. After initial low-dose CT (40 mA, 120 kVp), emission images were obtained from the top of the skull to the middle of the thigh, with acquisition times of 2 minutes per bed position in the three-dimensional mode. The PET images were reconstructed iteratively with CT-based attenuation correction (Figures 1 and 2).

2.3. Image Analysis

The image analysis was performed using Compass Viewer software. Circular regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn on axial, coronal, or sagittal coregistered PET/CT slices. Within the selected ROI, SUVmax, mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean), SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG were measured. SUVmax were calculated using the following formula: mean ROI activity (MBq/g)/(injected dose (MBq)/body weight (g)). SUVpeak was defined as the mean of SUVmax and its 10 neighbors (roughly corresponding to a 0.5 cm ROI). MTV and TLG could be measured by a fixed background SUV cut-off or a fixed percentage of the SUVmax. In this study, we calculated SUVmean and MTV based on a fixed threshold of 42% of SUVmax (SUVmean 42%, MTV 42%) or based on a fixed background SUV cut-off of 2.5 (SUVmean 2.5, MTV 2.5). TLG was defined as the MTV multiplied with the SUVmean (TLG 42%, TLG 2.5).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Correlation analysis between the functional parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT and overall survival (OS) was conducted, and Spearman’s rank coefficients were used to assess the relationship between the functional parameters and outcomes of the patients. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) at a significance level of .

3. Results

A total of 34 patients with testicular lymphoma were selected from this population. Eighteen of them had 18F-FDG PET/CT findings while only 6 had preoperative images. As a result, 6 patients ranging from 37 to 73 years old (median age, 58) were included in the analysis. Patients’ characteristics including the histological type, Ann Arbor stage, IPI score, NCCN IPI score, ECOG performance status, B symptom, metastatic sites, and treatment are described in Table 1. All patients had histopathological confirmation of DLBCL. Five (83.3%) out of 6 patients were classified clinically as stage IVB, and 1 (16.7%) as stage IEA according to the Ann Arbor classification. The IPI score of patients were calculated, and the results revealed that 5 patients (83.3%) had a score of 3 while 1 patient (16.7%) had a score of 1. In addition, 1 (16.7%) patient had an ECOG performance status of 1, while 5 patients (83.3%) had an ECOG performance status of 0. Of the 6 patients, 3 (50%) had tumor located on the left side and 1 (16.3%) on the right side, whereas 2 (33.3%) on the bilateral sides. Besides testicular disease, 5 of the patients were identified to have lymph nodes or other distant metastases. All the patients have received treatment, of whom 6 (100%) had orchiectomy and chemotherapy, 2 patients (33.3%) had local radiotherapy, and 4 (66.7%) received prophylactic intrathecal injection in addition to their systemic chemotherapy. Adjunct laboratory and immunohistochemical results of the patients, such as Ki-67, β2 microglobulin, and LDH, are also shown in Table 1.


NoAgeAnn Arbor stageIPI scoreECOG performance statusSiteNodal involvementExnodal involvementKi-67β2 microglobulin (mg/L)LDH (IU/L)Treatment

137IVB30BilateralPara-aortic lymph nodeBilateral kidney, perirenal region, and spleen80%2.33237Orchiectomy, CT, and prophylactic intrathecal injection
273IVB30RightAbdominal lymph nodeLung and nasopharyngeal wall40%2.63177Orchiectomy, CT, RT, and prophylactic intrathecal injection
357IVB31LeftNeck lymph nodeMaxillary sinus, maxillary bone, orbital cavity, temporalis, multiple subcutaneous tissue, and bone of trunk60%2.82301Orchiectomy and CT
458IEA10LeftN/AN/A223Orchiectomy, CT, and RT
573IVA30BilateralCervical lymph nodes and hilar lymph nodeSkin50%2.19246Orchiectomy, CT, and prophylactic intrathecal injection
658IVB30LeftMultiple lymph nodesKidney, adrenal gland, and spermatic cord90%NA367Orchiectomy and CT + prophylactic intrathecal injection

IPI, International Prognostic Index; NCCN IPI, National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index; ECOG performance status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; LDH, lactic dehydrogenase; CT, chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; N/A, not applicable.

Within the selected ROI, SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG were measured. The mean SUVmax was 11.09 and varied between 7.20 and 19.75; mean SUVpeak was 9.56 and ranged between 6.79 and 14.39. In addition, mean MTV 42% was 18.4 mL and varied between 1.3 mL and 61.6 mL; mean MTV 2.5 was 34.7 mL and varied significantly between 1.6 mL and 141.9 mL. With regard to TLG, mean TLG 42% was 168.906 and ranged from 7.514 to 687.004, while mean TLG 2.5 was 253.972 and ranged from 8.400 to 1127.802 (Table 2).


No.SUVmaxSUVpeakMTV 42%MTV 2.5TLG 42%TLG 2.5Overall survival (months)Outcomes

119.7514.3961.6141.9687.0041127.80226Alive
211.309.5213.116.991.045105.79454Death
37.986.993.84.820.78623.80817Alive
411.9011.5620.731.7168.912209.53722Death
57.206.799.711.244.17548.4918Alive
68.408.111.31.67.5148.40017Alive

SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake values; SUVpeak, peak standardized uptake values; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; TLG, total lesion glycolysis.

The result of correlation analysis between functional parameters and survival time indicated that SUVmax and SUVpeak were not significantly associated with OS of the patients. However, MTV 42%, MTV 2.5, TLG 42%, and TLG 2.5 were revealed to be significantly correlated with OS of the patients, with Spearman’s rank coefficients of 0.812 and (Table 3).


SUVmaxSUVpeakMTV 42%MTV 2.5TLG 42%TLG 2.5

Spearman rank correlation coefficient0.6380.6380.8120.8120.8120.812
value0.17310.17310.04980.04980.04980.0498

SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake values; SUVpeak, peak standardized uptake values; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; TLG, total lesion glycolysis.

4. Discussion

18F-FDG PET/CT is performed in combination with 18FDG PET and CT scanners.18F-FDG PET/CT has been reported to be a very useful tool with high sensitivity and specificity rates in evaluating most lymphoma subtypes, providing both metabolic and morphologic features of diseases [11]. Compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), PET/CT shows a higher diagnostic value with sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 100%, especially for normal-sized lymph nodes and extranodal involvement [1214]. Moreover, with the supplement of other examinations, 18F-FDG PET/CT can not only make accurate diagnosis but also assess the treatment response as well as predict the outcomes [1518]. However, as far as we know, the application of PET/CT in testicular DLBCL patients has not been well studied. In this study, we firstly focused on the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prognosis and staging of patients with testicular DLBCL and reported their SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG.

Because of its aggressive clinical biological behavior, patients with testicular lymphoma usually present a poor prognosis. Timely and accurate diagnosis of testicular lymphoma is vital since early diagnosis was reported to be associated with better outcomes [19]. Imaging modalities that may be helpful in diagnosis include ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and CT, while unfortunately none of these methods shows satisfying specificity [3]. Fine-needle aspiration, testicular biopsy, and orchiectomy have been used for pathological diagnosis of testicular lymphoma. Nevertheless, these pathological diagnostic process may do harm to the testes’ physiological functions as well as patients’ mental health [3]. PET/CT is now widely used in the diagnosis and initial staging of high-grade lymphoma [20]. In this study, we also demonstrated the value of PET/CT in diagnosis and staging among patients with testicular DLBCL.

SUVmax, the most widely used parameter, is a reproducible measurement for disease evaluation in a quantitative way [21]. Previous studies have reported that the normal level of FDG uptake in the testis is relatively high and symmetrical in pattern and declines slightly with age [22]. A study involving 203 men has demonstrated that the normal SUV range from 1.23 to 3.85 with a mean value of 2.44 [23]. In addition, previous study including 53 patients has reported that a SUVmax of 3.75 is the optimal cut-off value for differentiating between benign and malignant testicular diseases [24]. As for the testicular lesions of our population, the mean SUVmax was 11.09, with a range of 7.20 to 19.75. SUVmax of all our patients were larger than 3.75. The results of this study revealed a high FDG uptake in testicular DLBCL patients; therefore, abnormal uptake of FDG in testis warranted further analysis. In addition, the value of SUVpeak was also shown in this study. However, to the best of our acknowledgement, no previous studies have reported these indexes of testicular DLBCL patients.

MTV and TLG can be measured by a fixed background SUV cut-off or a fixed percentage of the SUVmax [2527]. Both MTV and TLG have been proposed to assess the burden of metabolically active tumors and are assumed to be reliable indicators of the tumor bulk [28]. In this study, we calculated MTV 42%, MTV 2.5, TLG 42%, and TLG 2.5 of each patient. The mean MTV 42% was 18.4 mL while the mean MTV 2.5 was 34.7 mL; meanwhile, both of them showed an apparent change. MTV of tumor burden has been recently found to be a useful prognostic factor in lymphoma [29]. TLG, which combined the volumetric and metabolic information of 18F-FDG PET, was also calculated in this study. Elevated TLG has also been shown to be associated with poor survival in various types of cancer, but its prognostic value in testicular lymphoma has not been well established [30]. As a result, we demonstrated that MTV and TLG may greatly differ between different patients. The values of MTV and TLG in neither normal testes nor testicular lymphoma have been investigated; thus, further studies are expected. To the best of our knowledge, we assessed the correlation between functional parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT and survival of patients with primary testicular DLBCL for the first time. MTV and TLG were shown to be correlated with survival with statistical significance, which indicated a potential prognostic value of MTV and TLG. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.

The current study has several limitations. First, this is a retrospective analysis. Second, the number of patients is small. Although we identified 18 testicular DLBCL with PET/CT scan, 12 of them had undergone orchiectomy before PET/CT examination. As a result, testicular disease could not be identified in the scan. Third, population from a single center also limits the conclusions of our study. Thus, further prospective randomized studies using multicenter data are required to confirm our findings. The strength of this study includes that histological confirmation of testicular DLBCL was obtained in all the patients, and patients’ data were complete.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, PET/CT scan has the potential in evaluating patients with testicular DLBCL. SUV, MTV, and TLG may vary a lot in different patients. SUVmax of testicular DLBCL lesion is relative higher than that of normal testis. Also, we provided a set of MTV and TLG data and firstly showed their significant correlation with OS, which indicated a potential prognostic value of MTV and TLG. However, studies with a larger population are needed to confirm these findings.

Abbreviations

DLBCL:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
CT:Computed tomography
18F-FDG:Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose
PET/CT:Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography
SUVmax:Maximum standardized uptake values
SUVpeak:Peak standardized uptake values
SUVmean:Mean standardized uptake values
MTV:Metabolic tumor volume
TLG:Total lesion glycolysis
NCCN:National Comprehensive Cancer Network
IPI:International Prognostic Index
ROI:regions of interest
OS:Overall survival.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Jing Yang and Xuelei Ma contributed equally to this work.

References

  1. M. B. Moller, F. d’Amore, and B. E. Christensen, “Testicular lymphoma: a population-based study of incidence, clinicopathological correlations and prognosis, The Danish Lymphoma Study Group, LYFO,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1760–1764, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. D. Gundrum, M. A. Mathiason, D. B. Moore, and R. S. Go, “Primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based study on the incidence, natural history, and survival comparison with primary nodal counterpart before and after the introduction of rituximab,” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 31, pp. 5227–5232, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Y. Cheah, A. Wirth, and J. F. Seymour, “Primary testicular lymphoma,” Blood, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 486–493, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. G. Lantz, N. Power, B. Hutton, and R. Gupta, “Malignant lymphoma of the testis: a study of 12 cases,” Canadian Urological Association Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 393–398, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  5. N. Verma, J. Lazarchick, V. Gudena, J. Turner, and U. B. Chaudhary, “Testicular lymphoma: an update for clinicians,” American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 336, no. 4, pp. 336–341, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. Hernandez-Maraver, F. Hernandez-Navarro, N. Gomez-Leon et al., “Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: diagnostic accuracy in lymphoma,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 293–302, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Mansi, V. Cuccurullo, and R. Grassi, “Diagnostic imaging and pathology,” in Advanced Imaging Techniques in Clinical Pathology, F. M. Sacerdoti, A. Giordano, and C. Cavaliere, Eds., pp. 107–111, Springer New York, New York, NY, USA, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  8. K. Pak, G. J. Cheon, K. W. Kang, J. K. Chung, E. E. Kim, and D. S. Lee, “Prognostic value of SUVmean in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers: comparison with SUVmax and other volumetric parameters of 18F-FDG PET,” Clin Nucl Med, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 9–13, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. Rubello, P. Gordien, C. Morliere et al., “Variability of Hepatic 18F-FDG Uptake at Interim PET in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. e405–e410, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Sher, F. Lacoeuille, P. Fosse et al., “For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for (18)FFDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time,” EJNMMI Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 016–0177, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Wang, “PET/CT: appropriate application in lymphoma,” Chinese Clinical Oncology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2304–3865, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. G. Schaefer, T. F. Hany, C. Taverna et al., “Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging--do we need contrast-enhanced CT?” Radiology, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 823–829, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Moog, M. Bangerter, C. G. Diederichs et al., “Extranodal malignant lymphoma: detection with FDG PET versus CT,” Radiology, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 475–481, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. Bednaruk-Mlynski, J. Pienkowska, A. Skorzak et al., “Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with classical contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the initial staging of Hodgkin lymphoma,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 377–382, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Ishiwata, M. Tomura, T. Ido, R. Iwata, J. Itoh, and M. Kameyama, “In vivo assessment of 6-deoxy-6-18Ffluoro-D-galactose as a PET tracer for studying galactose metabolism,” International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part B. Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 775–781, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. Mena, M. L. Lindenberg, B. I. Turkbey et al., “A pilot study of the value of 18F-fluoro-deoxy-thymidine PET/CT in predicting viable lymphoma in residual 18F-FDG avid masses after completion of therapy,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 874–881, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. T. Ilica, K. Kocacelebi, R. Savas, and A. Ayan, “Imaging of extranodal lymphoma with PET/CT,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. e127–e138, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Karunanithi, P. Sharma, S. G. Roy et al., “Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for evaluation of patients with primary splenic lymphoma,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 772–776, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. J. Buskirk, R. G. Evans, P. M. Banks, M. J. O’Connell, and J. D. Earle, “Primary lymphoma of the testis,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology∗Biology∗Physics, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1699–1703, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. S. Ahmad, S. F. Idris, G. A. Follows, and M. V. Williams, “Primary testicular lymphoma,” Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 358–365, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Schoder, A. Noy, M. Gonen et al., “Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 4643–4651, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Kosuda, S. Fisher, P. V. Kison, R. L. Wahl, and H. B. Grossman, “Uptake of 2-deoxy-2-18Ffluoro-D-glucose in the normal testis: retrospective PET study and animal experiment,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 195–199, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Kitajima, Y. Nakamoto, M. Senda, Y. Onishi, H. Okizuka, and K. Sugimura, “Normal uptake of 18F-FDG in the testis: an assessment by PET/CT,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 405–410, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Shao, Q. Gao, X. W. Tian, S. Y. Wang, C. H. Liang, and S. X. Wang, “Differentiation and diagnosis of benign and malignant testicular lesions using 18F-FDG PET/CT,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 93, pp. 114–120, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. Khiewvan, P. Ziai, S. Houshmand, A. Salavati, P. Ziai, and A. Alavi, “The role of PET/CT as a prognosticator and outcome predictor in lung cancer,” Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 317–330, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. H. Hwang, A. Cho, M. Yun, Y. D. Choi, S. Y. Rha, and W. J. Kang, “Prognostic value of pretreatment metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis using 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. e235–e241, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Castelli, A. Depeursinge, B. de Bari et al., “Metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in oropharyngeal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: which threshold is the best predictor of local control?” Clin Nucl Med, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. e281–e285, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Lim, A. Eaton, N. Y. Lee et al., “18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1506–1513, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. J. Moskowitz, H. Schoder, S. Gavane et al., “Prognostic significance of baseline metabolic tumor volume in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma,” Blood, vol. 130, no. 20, pp. 2196–2203, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Xie, W. Zhai, S. Cheng, H. Zhang, Y. Xie, and W. He, “Predictive value of F-18 FDG PET/CT quantization parameters for progression-free survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” Hematology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 99–105, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Jing Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

691 Views | 350 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.