Research Article
Fully Automated Delineation of Gross Tumor Volume for Head and Neck Cancer on PET-CT Using Deep Learning: A Dual-Center Study
Table 1
Comparison of the segmentation performance in Experiment 2 between our proposed CNN model and the similar studies.
| Studies | Algorithm | Images used | Average DSC | Automatic | Patient number | Center number | Journal |
| Yang et al. [13] | MRFs | PET, CT, and MRI | 0.740 | Fully automatic | 22 | 1 | Medical Physics | Stefano et al. [14] | AK-RW | PET | 0.848 | Semiautomatic | 18 | 1 | Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing | Berthon et al. [15] | Decision tree | PET | 0.770 | Fully automatic | 20 | 1 | Radiotherapy & Oncology | Song et al. [17] | Graph-based cosegmentation | PET | 0.761 | Semiautomatic | 2 | 1 | IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | Zeng et al. [16] | Active surface modeling | PET | 0.700 | Fully automatic | 2 | 1 | Computers in Biology and Medicine | Proposed method | CNN | PET and CT | 0.736 | Fully automatic | 22 | 2 | ā |
|
|
Note: DSC, dice similarity coefficient; MRFs, Markov random fields; AK-RW, adaptive random walker with k-means; CNN, convolutional neural network.
|