Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Volume 2019, Article ID 3548284, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3548284
Review Article

Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview

1Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
2Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy
3Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine and School of Sports Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
4Scientific Institute of Research and Scientific Institute of Research and Care, San Raffaele, Pisana, Italy
5Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle on Tyne, UK
6Pediatric Unit, Verona University Medical School, Verona, Italy
7Sapienza University of Rome, Experimental Medicine Department, Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section, Food Science and Human Nutrition Research Unit, Rome, Italy
8Division of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatologic Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
9Interuniversity Centre for Obesity and Eating Disorders (CISRODCA), Federico II University of Naples, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Antonino De Lorenzo; ti.2amorinu@ozneroled

Received 18 March 2019; Accepted 5 May 2019; Published 29 May 2019

Guest Editor: Nicola Toschi

Copyright © 2019 Maurizio Marra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The measurement of body composition (BC) represents a valuable tool to assess nutritional status in health and disease. The most used methods to evaluate BC in the clinical practice are based on bicompartment models and measure, directly or indirectly, fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (nowadays considered as the reference technique in clinical practice) are extensively used in epidemiological (mainly BIA) and clinical (mainly DXA) settings to evaluate BC. DXA is primarily used for the measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) and density to assess bone health and diagnose osteoporosis in defined anatomical regions (femur and spine). However, total body DXA scans are used to derive a three-compartment BC model, including BMC, FM, and FFM. Both these methods feature some limitations: the accuracy of BIA measurements is reduced when specific predictive equations and standardized measurement protocols are not utilized whereas the limitations of DXA are the safety of repeated measurements (no more than two body scans per year are currently advised), cost, and technical expertise. This review aims to provide useful insights mostly into the use of BC methods in prevention and clinical practice (ambulatory or bedridden patients). We believe that it will stimulate a discussion on the topic and reinvigorate the crucial role of BC evaluation in diagnostic and clinical investigation protocols.

1. Introduction

The human body comprises more than thirty measurable components [1]. A direct in vivo measurement of body components is currently not possible; consequently, indirect methods and models have been developed to do that. Within this framework, the World Health Organization (WHO) defines “nutritional status” as the condition of the body, resulting from the balance of intake, absorption, and utilization of nutrients interacting with individual physiological and pathological status.

The most frequently applied model to evaluate body composition (BC) in clinical practice and epidemiology splits the body into fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM), i.e., the bicompartmental model. FM indicates the water-free body component; the remaining body components (skeletal muscle, internal organs, and interstitial fat tissue) are included in the FFM. The most accurate methods to measure FM and FFM according to the bicompartment model are densitometry (underwater weighing), hydrometry (deuterium dilution), Echo-MRI, and total body potassium (TBK) counting. However, these methods are characterized by complex measurement protocols and require specialized expertise and costly equipment, making their application in clinical settings limited.

Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used method to evaluate BC for both epidemiological and clinical purposes; it measures the electrical properties of body tissue and estimates BC parameters as total body water (TBW) and FFM BC parameters (see methods).

BIA is a noninvasive, low cost, and reliable method for BC assessment in clinical and nonclinical settings. The basic principle of the BIA technique is that the transit time of a low-voltage electric current through the body depends on BC characteristics [2]. However, this methodology has limitations due to the chemical composition of FFM (i.e., water, proteins, glycogen, and minerals) because of considerable inter- and intraindividual variability as a consequence of changes in FFM occurring with growth, maturation, ageing, and disease states [3].

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current reference method for the assessment of BC, mainly because it provides accurate estimates of bone mineral, fat, and lean soft tissue (the so called three-compartment model) [4]. DXA utilizes low-emission X-rays to measure the attenuation of incident X-ray beams when they pass through body tissues (high attenuation for bone and low attenuation for fat).

The assessment of bone health to establish diagnosis of osteoporosis and fracture risk requires DXA for evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) in selected anatomical regions of interest (e.g., spine and femur). In addition, DXA is capable of providing estimates of visceral fat using validated predictive algorithms [5] and furnishes a measure of truncal fat mass, which has been found to be predictive of disease risk [6].

This review aims to summarize the scientific background of BIA and DXA and to furnish a comprehensive overview of their theoretical/technical concepts and application in bedridden and ambulatory patients and the information they can provide on drug pharmacokinetics.

2. Assessment of BC by BIA

BIA measures the electrical properties of body tissues and represents a useful approach for estimating body composition parameters such as TBW and FFM. In the bicompartment model, the human body is composed of FFM, which includes, under physiological conditions, the following components: bone mineral content (≈7%), extracellular water (≈29%), intracellular water (≈44%), and visceral protein (=20%). BIA estimation of body composition is based on body fluid volume measurement using BIA resistance value [2, 7, 8].

Bioelectrical impedance, or bioimpedance (Z, Ω), is defined as the opposition of a conductor to the flow of an alternating electrical current applied to it. Bioimpedance varies with tissue composition as well as with the frequency of the applied current. Bioimpedance is a complex parameter derived from the vector relationship between resistance (R, Ω), which arises from intracellular and extracellular fluids, and reactance (Xc, Ω), which is related to the capacitance of the cell membrane [7]. Although the human body is not a uniform cylinder, an empirical relationship can be established between the ratio height2/R (cm2/Ω 50 kHz), defined as bioimpedance index (BI) measured at 50 kHz, and the volume of TBW, approximately 73% of FFM in healthy individuals.

Single-Frequency-BIA (SF-BIA), generally at 50 kHz, is passed between surface electrodes placed on hand and foot. Some BIA devices use other electrode placements, such as foot-to-foot or hand-to-hand electrode (Bipedal BIA). Many studies have compared multifrequency hand-to-foot (HF-BIA) and foot-to-foot (FF-BIA) bioimpedance analysis in order to assess differences in FFM values in populations with a wide range of body mass index (BMI) [9, 10] and they found that FF-BIA gives lowest values of FFM in overweight and obese subjects, also if compared with the results of the DXA [11]. In clinical practice, BIA allows monitoring of body fluids (extracellular/intracellular ratio) and therefore patients’ nutritional status, in the short time and long time [12, 13].

2.1. Phase Angle

The phase angle, or PA ((R/Xc) × (180/π)), expressed in degrees) reflects the ratio between intra- and extracellular water. It may be affected by nutritional and hydration status [2] (Figure 1). In healthy subjects, PA ranges between 6° and 7° [14], and in athletes it may reach 8.5° [15]. Low PA (<5°) indicates the loss of cellular integrity [1618]. The PA appears to be a more sensitive indicator of nutritional status compared to impedance since it is closely associated with cellular integrity [1922].

Figure 1: Phase angle.
2.2. Multifreqency BIA and BIA Spectroscopy

BIA can be performed using simultaneously electrical current with different frequencies. The application of more than two frequencies, ranging from low (1 kHz) to high (500 kHz) frequencies, allows the measurement of TBW, FFM, FM, and ICW and ECW compartments. At low frequencies (1–5 kHz), the electric current does not penetrate the cell membrane, and therefore it is assumed that the current passes through the extracellular fluid. Conversely, at higher frequencies (>50 kHz), the current passes through the cell membranes and it is associated with both intracellular and extracellular fluid compartments [2325]. Frequencies higher than 100 kHz do not improve the accuracy of body composition estimation (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) variation of impedance with frequency. Resistances extrapolated at zero (Re) and infinite (R) frequencies.

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) differs in the underlying, theoretical basis from the more commonly applied single-frequency BIA, because it does not require the use of statistically derived, population-specific prediction equations. One of the main advantages of the BIS is its ability to differentiate between ECW and ICW. BIS has been found to be accurate for measuring changes in fluid volumes [26].

2.3. Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA)

In the BIVA approach, introduced by Piccoli et al., [27] R and Xc (R-Xc graph), obtained at 50 kHz, are normalized to height (R/ht and Xc/ht, respectively), and plotted as bivariate vectors (Figure 3). BIVA allows a direct assessment of body fluid volume through patterns of vector distribution on the R-Xc plane without the knowledge of the body weight. Reference tolerance ellipses (50, 75, and 95%) for the individual vector were previously calculated in the healthy population and specific patient populations. Bioelectrical vectors are analyzed by evaluating their position with respect to reference values (tolerance ellipses): a significant decrease in body hydration shifts the vector towards the upper pole of the ellipse major axis, whereas fluid retention moves it in the opposite direction. The vector shifts along the minor axis of the ellipse according to individual soft tissue body cell mass, shifting on the left side with more cell mass.

Figure 3: Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA). R = resistance (ohm) measured at 50 kHz; Xc = reactance (ohm) measured at 50 kHz; H = height expressed in meters.
2.4. Assessment of Body Composition by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

Among different methods of body composition measurements, DXA provides whole body and regional estimates of three main components: FM, lean body mass (LBM), and bone mineral content (BMC). Several options are available as the first choice to investigate visceral fat, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computer tomography (CT) scanning, because they provide a quantitative and qualitative assessment of visceral (pre- and postperitoneal) and subcutaneous (superficial and deep) adipose tissue [28,29]. However, costs, technical staff and expertise, contraindications, and accessibility to these methods are important limitations. Therefore, DXA is also used to investigate visceral fat.

DXA uses a source that generates X-rays, a detector, and an interface with a computer system for imaging the scanned areas of interest. The effective radiation doses involved are small (1–7 μSv), making the technique widely applicable. Due to DXA’s advantages in terms of accuracy, simplicity, availability, and relatively low expense as compared to procedures like TBK, MRI or CT IMAGING, and low radiation exposure, DXA measurement is becoming increasingly important, emerging as reference assessment technique also in muscle mass evaluation [30]. DXA systems are practical, require no active subject involvement, and impose minimal risk [20, 31, 32]. Radiation exposure from a whole body DXA scan is equivalent to between 1 and 10% of a chest X-ray [20]. Moreover, unlike most other body composition methods that are designed to quantitate a single whole body component, DXA allows quantification of multiple whole body and regional components. As a result, DXA is gaining international acceptance as a body composition reference method [33], particularly in severe malnutrition and overweight/obesity.

2.5. Clinical Indications to BIA Utilization

Being a noninvasive method, BIA allows to follow body composition modifications in time, for example, in case of weight loss during acute or chronic diseases or, on the contrary, during weight gain, offering the possibility to have a prognostic forecast [34].

Anyway, there are several factors that can affect the BIA results, such as nonstandardization of body position, previous physical exercise, and food or fluid intake [35]. Also, different predictive equations have been developed to estimate TBW and FFM which include several parameters such as sex, age, and body weight. These predictive equations are generally population-specific and device-specific and can be useful only in individuals with the same characteristics of the reference population and with a physiological hydration status [2].

In addition, pathological conditions could modify the individual’s hydration level (dehydration/edema). Hence, existing equations for FFM could not be used, in as much as they do not make a distinction between the amount of intracellular and extracellular water. The development and validation of specific equations is mandatory and should be the focus of future studies.

Regarding PA, it is a useful parameter in clinical practice as it allows identification and monitoring of patients at risk of impaired nutritional status and decreased survival, such as HIV/AIDS, cancer, anorexia, liver cirrhosis, hemodialysis, and pulmonary disease geriatric and surgical patients [21, 3640].

Few studies have also addressed the possibility to apply PA in Sport Medicine to evaluate physical performance [4143]. Silva et al. [32] described a positive correlation between handgrip strength and PA in elite judo athletes during a competition. Recently, Marra et al. [33] showed in a team of elite endurance cyclists, evaluated during their participation to a tournament-cycling race (Giro d’Italia), a significant and progressive reduction of PA. The reduction of the PA suggests a loss of intracellular water (ICW), which could be explained by the long-term competition and continuous vigorous exercise [44]. That study [44] showed that PA is a useful method for monitoring body composition and for obtaining information on the cell integrity, even if its relationship with sports performance is not readily evident. For this reason, in the future, it is advisable to conduct studies in elite athletes to verify the link between the PA and muscle strength and performance.

Despite the close correlation between nutritional status and phase angle, however, not all studies found the phase angle a reliable indicator of disease-related malnutrition. This led to the use of BIVA approach as an alternative tool to assess and monitor patients’ hydration and nutrition status in several pathologic conditions, such as hemodialysis [45] or ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [46], liver cirrhosis [47], critically ill [48], and obese patients with stable and changing weight [49], because of its independence from regression equations in the calculation of lean body mass and fat mass and body weight.

In such a way, BIVA enables a more detailed understanding of hydration status and cell mass compared to phase angle alone. Since phase angle is calculated from reactance and resistance, different positions of the vector in the R-Xc graph can theoretically produce identical phase angles (Figure 3). Differentiation between obese (high phase angle, short vector) and athletic subjects (high phase angle and long vector) is consequently possible by BIVA just as discrimination between cachectic (low phase angle and long vector) and lean subjects (normal phase angle and long vector).

In conclusion, bioelectrical phase angle and BIVA represent a clinical approach to body composition, free from prediction equations-inherent errors and assumptions, although quantities of body compartments are not measured.

3. Clinical Indications to Use DXA

DXA is routinely used in clinical practice for the measurement of bone mineral tissue, allowing the diagnosis and the follow-up of osteoporosis, a potentially high-risk condition characterized by malabsorption, malnutrition, and long-term corticosteroid therapies, frequently observed in post menopause and in several chronic diseases.

The use of DXA for the assessment of body composition in daily clinical practice should be extended to overweight/obese patients in order to better evaluate their long-term cardiovascular and oncologic risk related to excessive adiposity.

BMI changes determined at individual level do not distinguish between increased body weight due to fat or nonfat mass. Indeed, WHO has defined BMI a good measure of adiposity at the population level, but a “surrogate” measure of adiposity at the individual level [50]. DXA measures excess adiposity with more accuracy than BMI, but, although promising, it is premature to recommend its routine use for the diagnosis of obesity because there have been few clear statements regarding its clinical indication for body composition assessment in patients outside the research setting [51]. However, DXA could be used to monitor changes in lean and fat tissues in obese subjects undergoing major weight losses, such as after bariatric surgery [52, 53]. In this condition, body weight might not change, but body composition might change during weight loss interventions. DXA allows to quantify total fat and lean soft tissue and also truncal and visceral fat [52], which are useful in the evaluation of cardiometabolic risk [54, 55]. Therefore, DXA may represent a method for clinical assessment of weight changes and/or training programs on fat and FFM compartments [51]. DXA analysis can also be used in patients with sarcopenia [30, 51]. This condition involves a decreased skeletal muscle mass and strength, and it is usually described in the elderly. Similarly to obesity, it is considered a risk factor for metabolic disease [56]. When sarcopenia and obesity occur concomitantly in an individual, the condition is referred to as sarcopenic obesity (SO) [57].

Using DXA, we could also acquire information on the three compartments (lean, fat, and bone) of the body, and four regions (i.e., head, trunk, arms, and legs) so as to obtain information on the efficacy of treatment in osteoporosis and other clinical conditions related to bone turnover.

Other examples of clinical indications to DXA are the following:

3.1. Pediatric Age

Body composition analysis in children provides a window into the complex changes that occur throughout childhood and gives the opportunity for understanding metabolic and physiological correlations [50, 51, 58]. DXA has the ability to evaluate nutritional status and growth disorders by analyzing the individual compartments of the body, thus offering the opportunity for studying skeletal maturation and mineral homeostasis in relation to environmental and/or pathological factors involved in the development [5962].

3.2. Patients with HIV

DXA total body composition with regional analysis can be used in HIV patients to assess fat distribution in those using antiretroviral agents who are at risk of lipoatrophy [51]. DXA allows to detect the individual and independent effects of antiretroviral agents on peripheral (arm and leg) and central (trunk) fat. DXA has been demonstrated to be a highly sensitive and consistently reliable technique for detecting changes in fat distribution over a relatively short period (e.g., months) before clinically apparent lipodystrophy develops [51, 58].

3.3. Patients Candidate or Treated with Bariatric Surgery

DXA can be used in obese subjects undergoing bariatric surgery in order to monitor lean and fat mass changes. Repeat scans could be done at 3 months after bariatric surgery. Early detection of lean soft tissue decline during weight loss may prompt clinical recommendations for increasing physical exercise and more appropriate dietary advice [51, 63, 64], even though practical considerations limit the use of DXA in severely obese subjects.

3.4. Safety of DXA

There are no contraindications to the use of DXA in the clinical practice with the exception of pregnancy [65]. However, being a radiological procedure, DXA should be performed no more than twice per year, which is comparable to the exposure to an intercontinental flight, thus not requiring strict monitoring, at least in some patients [51].

4. Body Composition and Pharmacokinetics: A Window of Opportunities for Research and Therapeutics

There is still scant awareness on the issue that responses to drugs can be affected by changes in body composition. Even though obesity and cachexia, at the extremes, may interfere with drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at multiple levels, the most relevant effects are on drug distribution, i.e., on the diffusion of drugs from the blood to the tissues [6668]. Given that the total amount of a drug that moves from the blood into its distribution compartment (mainly fat mass for lipophilic drugs and fat-free mass for hydrophilic drugs) depends on the size of the compartment, drug distribution will be affected by body composition status. When a drug is administered to a patient with its relative distribution compartment(s) larger than that of normal, its peak concentration in plasma will be lower and the time for its disappearance from blood longer than normal, leading to smaller but longer pharmacological effects [67, 68].

Conversely, higher peak concentrations and shorter persistence in plasma are expected when its distribution compartment is smaller than normal, suggesting that, in these conditions, toxicity could be higher even in the setting of a lower clinical efficacy. The pharmacokinetic consequences of the expansion of drug distribution compartments have been studied in more details in general anesthesia in obese patients [68, 69]. Moreover, it has been repeatedly suggested that underdosing drug could be a very common problem in obese patients [7072] and strategies for dose corrections in morbid obesity have been established [68, 73, 74]. However, the information for several classes of drugs in obesity is still very limited, and strong efforts are needed to address this issue.

In addition, until recently, little attention has been paid to the effects of the decrease in fat and/or fat-free mass on the pharmacokinetics of drugs in sarcopenic conditions, with the exception of few studies performed in selected pathologic conditions such as AIDS [75]. The interest on this issue boosted in the recent years after the publication of a series of influential papers showing that the dose-dependent toxicity of hydrophilic antineoplastic drugs such as 5-FU or capecitabine is higher in sarcopenic patients and inversely related with psoas muscle surface area measured by CT scan at the level of L3 [76]. This observation fits well with the evidence that FFM and, especially skeletal muscle mass, represents the main distribution compartment for these drugs [68]. The issue of drug distribution in muscles and its consequences in neoplastic patients with sarcopenia is further complicated by the evidence that some transduction therapy agents, such as sorafenib, may reduce muscle mass by a direct action [77]. This suggests potential, new, and unexpected interactions between different combination chemotherapy protocols with drugs that directly affect the size of the distribution compartments. Researches specifically focused on dose adjustments of drugs, according to body composition characteristics, are warranted for a precision, personalized therapy.

5. Future Directions

This review highlighted the relevance of body composition assessment and monitoring by BIA and DXA in the evaluation of nutritional status in several pathological conditions. However, for a wider clinical application, some issues related to these techniques should be addressed.

Future investigations on BIA could include the following:(i)Improving validation of BIA equations according to age, sex, and ethnicity(ii)Developing specific equations for under or overhydrated patients(iii)Developing PA prognostic/survival predictive values in pathological conditions(iv)Accurate validation of MF-BIA, segmental BIA, and BIS in conditions of body fluid abnormalities (heart, liver, kidney diseases, etc.)

For DXA, future developments could be the following:(i)Individuating factors that affect the accuracy of the methods, such as subject’s body shape and size, calibration procedures, software version, and instrumental models(ii)Advanced analysis techniques that significantly reduce the impact of motion artifacts on infant DXA scans(iii)Highly standardized and reproducible patient positioning and image analysis procedures to accurately measure axial, appendicular, and segmental regions of interest(iv)Assessing how changes in fat distribution affect the accuracy of estimates/measurements, in as much as an estimated body composition by DXA changes with age, exercise, and diet

Finally, future studies appear mandatory to better understand the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of different drugs and BC in different nutritional states.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

In May 2016, a group of Italian experts in body composition research convened in Naples (Italy) at a mini symposium to discuss the role of body composition measurement in research and clinical practice focusing particularly on the application of BIA and DXA. The symposium was held in memory of Prof Flaminio Fidanza (1920–2013), who worked with Prof Ancel Keys and became rapidly an influential figure in the field of nutrition and body composition research. The authors acknowledge the participation of Prof P. Buono, Prof A, Colantuoni, Dr. C. De Caprio, Dr. E. De Filippo, Prof. B. Guida, Dr. G. Monacelli, Prof M. Muscaritoli, Dr. M. Parillo, Prof P. Sbraccia, Prof. L. Scalfi, Dr. R. Trio, and Prof. G. Valerio for their contribution to the discussion during meeting sessions.

References

  1. Z. Wang, R. N. Pierson, and S. B. Heymsfield, “The five level model: a new approach to organizing body composition research,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. U. G. Kyle, I. Bosaeus, A. De Lorenzo et al., “Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part I: review of principles and methods,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1226–1243, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. B. Houtkooper, S. B. Going, T. G. Lohman, A. F. Roche, and M. Van Loan, “Bioelectrical impedance estimation of fat-free body mass in children and youth: a cross-validation study,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 366–373, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. R. B. Mazess, H. S. Barden, J. P. Bisek, and J. Hanson, “Dual-energy absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 51, pp. 1106–1112, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Kaul, M. P. Rothney, D. M. Peters et al., “Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat,” Obesity, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1313–1318, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. B. Snijder, J. M. Dekker, M. Visser et al., “Trunk fat and leg fat have independent and opposite associations with fasting and postload glucose levels,” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 372–377, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. R. Foster and H. C. Lukaski, “Whole-body impedance what does it measure?” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 388S–396S, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Matthie, B. Zarowitz, A. De Lorenzo et al., “Analytic assessment of the various bioimpedance methods used to estimate body water,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1801–1816, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Tagliabue, A. Andreoli, M Comelli et al., “Prediction of lean body mass from multifrequency segmental impedance: influence of adiposity,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Gagnon, J. Ménard, A. Bourbonnais et al., “Comparison of foot-to-foot and hand-to-foot bioelectrical impedance methods in a population with a wide range of body mass indices,” Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 437–441, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. T. Chen, Y. Y. Chen, C. W. Wang et al., “Comparison of standing posture bioelectrical impedance analysis with DXA for body composition in a large, healthy Chinese population,” PLoS One, vol. 11, Article ID e0160105, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. Guirao, G. Franch, M. J. Gil, M. I. García-Domingo, M. Girvent, and A. Sitges-Serra, “Extracellular volume, nutritional status, and refeeding changes,” Nutrition, vol. 10, pp. 558–561, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. F. Saladino, “The efficacy of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) in monitoring body composition changes during treatment of restrictive eating disorder patients,” Journal of Eating Disorders, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 34, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. C. Barbosa-Silva, A. J. Barros, J. Wang, S. B. Heymsfield, and R. N. Pierson Jr., “Bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values for phase angle by age and sex,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 49–52, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Marra, B. Da Prat, C. Montagnese et al., “Body composition changes in professional cyclists during the 2011 Giro d’Italia, a 3-week stage race,” Nutritional Therapy and Metabolism, vol. 32, pp. 31–34, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. Selberg and D. Selberg, “Norms and correlates of bioimpedance phase angle in healthy human subjects, hospitalized patients, and patients with liver cirrhosis,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 509–516, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Scalfi, M. Marra, A. Caldara, E. Silvestri, and F. Contaldo, “Changes in bioimpedance analysis after stable refeeding of undernourished anorexic patients,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133–137, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Marra, E. De Filippo, A. Signorini et al., “Phase angle is a predictor of basal metabolic rate in female patients with anorexia nervosa,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. S145–S152, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Gupta, C. G. Lis, S. L. Dahlk et al., “The relationship between bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in advanced colorectal cancer,” Nutrition Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Y. Lee and D. Ghallagher, “Assessment methods in human body composition,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 566–572, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Santarpia, M. Marra, C. Montagnese, L. Alfonsi, F. Pasanisi, and F. Contaldo, “Prognostic significance of bioelectrical impedance phase angle in advanced cancer: preliminary observations,” Nutrition, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 930-931, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. D. Plank and G. L. Hill, “Similarity of changes in body composition in intensive care patients following severe sepsis or major blunt injury,” Annals of the New York Academy, vol. 904, no. 1, pp. 592–602, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. W. J. Hannan, S. J. Cowen, K. C. H. Fearson, C. E. Plester, J. S. Falconer, and R. A. Richardson, “Evaluation of multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis for the assessment of extracellular and total body water in surgical patients,” Clinical Science, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 479–485, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. V. Patel, E. L. Peterson, N. Silverman, and B. J. Zarowitz, “Estimation of total body and extracellular water in post-coronary artery bypass surgical patients using single and multiple frequency bioimpedance,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1824–1828, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Deurenberg, A. Andreoli, and A. De Lorenzo, “Multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance: a comparison between the cole-cole modelling and Hanai equations with the classical impedance index approach,” Annals of Human Biology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Earthman, D. Traughber, J. Dobratz, and W. Howell, “Bioimpedance spectroscopy for clinical assessment of fluid distribution and body cell mass,” Nutrition in Clinical Practice, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 389–405, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Piccoli, B. Rossi, L. Pillon, and G. Bucciante, “A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: the RXc graph,” Kidney International, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 534–539, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W. Shen, Z. Wang, M. Punyanita et al., “Adipose tissue quantification by imaging methods: a proposed classification,” Obesity Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Ross, B. Goodpaster, D. Kelley, and F. Boada, “Magnetic resonance imaging in human body composition research. From quantitative to qualitative tissue measurement,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 904, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S. B. Heymsfield, M. C. Gonzalez, J. Lu, G. Jia, and J. Zheng, “Skeletal muscle mass and quality: evolution of modern measurement concepts in the context of sarcopenia,” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 355–366, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Pietrobelli, C. Formica, Z. Wang, and S. B. Heymsfield, “Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 271, no. 6, pp. E941–E951, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Pietrobelli, Z. Wang, C. Formica, and S. B. Heymsfield, “Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry fat estimation errors due to variation in soft tissue hydration,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 274, no. 5, pp. E808–E816, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. E. Williams, J. C. Wells, C. M. Wilson, D. Haroun, A. Lucas, and M. S. Fewtrell, “Evaluation of Lunar Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in healthy persons and patients by comparison with the criterion 4-component model,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1047–1054, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Bosy-Westphal, W. Braun, C. Geisler, K. Norman, and M. J. Müller, “Body composition and cardiometabolic health: the need for novel concepts,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 638–644, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. F. Kushner, D. A. Schoeller, C. R. Fjeld, and L. Danford, “Is the impedance index (ht2/R) significant in predicting total body water?” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 835–839, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Tsigos, C. Stefanaki, G. I. Lambrou, D. Boschiero, and G. P. Chrousos, “Stress and inflammatory biomarkers and symptoms are associated with bioimpedance measures,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 126–134, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Ott, H. Fischer, H. Polat et al., “Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a predictor of survival in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Meeuwsen, G. W. Horgan, and M. Elia, “The relationship between BMI and percent body fat, measured by bioelectrical impedance, in a large adult sample is curvilinear and influenced by age and sex,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 560–566, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. M. Silva, D. A. Fields, S. B. Heymsfield, and L. B. Sardinha, “Body composition and power changes in elite judo athletes,” International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 737–741, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. M. Silva, D. A. Fields, S. B. Heymsfield, and L. B. Sardinha, “Relationship between changes in total-body water and fluid distribution with maximal forearm strength in elite judo athletes,” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2488–2495, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Andreoli, A. De Lorenzo, F. Cadeddu, L. Iacopino, and M. Grande, “New trends in nutritional status assessment of cancer patients,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 469–480, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  42. L. Di Renzo, M. G. Carbonelli, A. Bianchi et al., “Body composition changes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: what is the role of -174G>C interleukin-6 promoter gene polymorphism in the therapeutic strategy?” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 369–378, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Marra, A. Caldara, C. Montagnese et al., “Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in constitutionally lean females, ballet dancers and Patients with anorexia nervosa,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 905–908, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Marra, B. Da Prat, C. Montagnese et al., “Segmental bioimpedance analysis in professional cyclists during a three week stage race,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1035–1040, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. Nescolarde, A. Piccoli, A. Román et al., “Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in haemodialysis patients: relation between oedema and mortality,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1271–1280, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Piccoli and Italian CAPD-BIA Study Group, “Bioelectric impedance vector distribution in peritoneal dialysis patients with different hydration status,” Kidney International, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1050–1063, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. F. W. Guglielmi, T. Mastronuzzi, L. Pietrini, A. Panarese, C. Panella, and A. Francavilla, “The RXc graph in evaluating and monitoring fluid balance in patients with liver cirrhosis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 873, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. Piccoli, G. Pittoni, E. Facco, E. Favaro, and L. Pillon, “Relationship between central venous pressure and bioimpedance vector analysis in critically ill patients,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Piccoli, A. Brunani, G. Savia et al., “Discriminating between body fat and fluid changes in the obese adult using bioimpedance vector analysis,” International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  50. WHO, Obesity Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  51. D. L. Kendler, J. L. C. Borges, R. A. Fielding et al., “The official positions of the International society for clinical densitometry: indications of use and reporting of DXA for body composition,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 496–507, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. T. Katzmarzyk, F. L. Greenway, S. B. Heymsfield, and C. Bouchard, “Clinical utility and reproducibility of visceral adipose tissue measurements derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in White and African American adults,” Obesity, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2221–2224, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. de Mesquita Barros Almeida Leite, L. Di Renzo, P. Sinibaldi Salimei et al., “Lean body mass: reference values for Italian population between 18 to 88 years old,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 7891–7898, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. D. L. Ergun, M. P. Rothney, and M. K. Oates, “Visceral adipose tissue quantification using Lunar prodigy,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. De Lorenzo, L. Soldati, F. Sarlo, M. Calvani, N. Di Lorenzo, and L. Di Renzo, “New obesity classification criteria as a tool for bariatric surgery indication,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 681–703, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. Hruby and F. B. Hu, “The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture,” Pharmacoeconomics, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 673–689, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. C. V. Tovo, S. A. Fernandes, C. Buss, and A. A. de Mattos, “Sarcopenia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: is there a relationship? A systematic review,” World Journal of Hepatology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 326–332, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. B. Cavalcanti, A. M. Cheung, J. Raboud, and S. Walmsley, “Reproducibility od DXA estimation of body fat in HIV lipodystrophy: implications for clinical research,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 293–297, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. Sopher, W. Shen, and A. Pietrobelli, “Pediatric body composition methods,” in Human Body Composition, S. B. Heymsfield, T. G. Lohman, Z. M. Wang, and S. B. Going, Eds., pp. 129–140, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  60. A. Pietrobelli and D. A. Fields, “Energy expenditure and body composition techniques,” in Handbook of Pediatric Obesity, M. I. Goran and M. Sothern, Eds., pp. 99–119, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  61. D. A. Fields, E. W. Demerath, A. Pietrobelli, and P. C. Chandler-Laney, “Body composition at 6 months of life: comparison of air-displacement plethysmography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry,” Obesity, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 2302–2306, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. C. Colica, L. Di Renzo, P. Gualtieri et al., “Development and cross-validation of predictive equation for estimating total body lean in children,” Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. R. A. Tamboli, H. A. Hossain, P. A. Marks et al., “Body composition and energy metabolism following Roux-en-Y gastric by-pass surgery,” Obesity, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1718–1724, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. N. Di Daniele, A. Noce, M. F. Vidiri et al., “Impact of Mediterranean diet on metabolic syndrome, cancer and longevity,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 8947–8979, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. C. H. McCollough, B. A. Schueler, T. D. Atwell et al., “Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned?” Radiographics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 909–918, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. Andreoli, F. Garaci, F. P. Cafarelli, and G. Guglielmi, “Body composition in clinical practice,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 1461–1468, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. G. Cheymol, “Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics implications for drug therapy,” Clinical Pharmacokinetics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 215–231, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. A. Knibbe, M. J. Brill, A. van Rongen, J. Diepstraten, P. H. van der Graaf, and M. Danhof, “Drug disposition in obesity: toward evidence-based dosing,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 149–167, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. Casati and M. Putzu, “Anesthesia in the obese patient: pharmacokinetic considerations,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 134–145, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. A. K. Polso, J. L. Lassiter, and J. L. Nagel, “Impact of hospital guideline for weight-based antimicrobial dosing in morbidly obese adults and comprehensive literature review,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 584–608, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. L. Roe, J. M. Fuentes, and M. E. Mullins, “Underdosing of common antibiotics for obese patients in the ED,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1212–1214, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. J. Griggs, P. B. Mangu, H. Anderson et al., “Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 1553–1561, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. Ingrande and H. J. Lemmens, “Dose adjustment of anaesthetics in the morbidly obese,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 105, pp. i16–i23, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. M. P. Pai and D. T. Bearden, “Antimicrobial dosing considerations in obese adult patients,” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1081–1091, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. K. Trobec, M. Kerec Kos, S. von Haehling, J. Springer, S. D. Anker, and M. Lainscak, “Pharmacokinetics of drugs in cachectic patients: a systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79603, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. C. M. Prado, V. E. Baracos, L. J. McCargar et al., “Body composition as an independent determinant of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy toxicity,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3264–3268, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. Antoun, L. Birdsell, M. B. Sawyer, P. Venner, B. Escudier, and V. E. Baracos, “Association of skeletal muscle wasting with treatment with sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from a placebo-controlled study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1054–1060, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus