Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2012, Article ID 651475, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/651475
Research Article

Atomic Radiations in the Decay of Medical Radioisotopes: A Physics Perspective

Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

Received 21 March 2012; Revised 17 May 2012; Accepted 17 May 2012

Academic Editor: Eva Bezak

Copyright © 2012 B. Q. Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Sgouros, “Alpha-particles for targeted therapy,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1402–1406, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Auger, “Sur l'effet photoélectrique composé,” Journal de Physique et le Radium, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 205, 1925. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. I. Kassis, “The amazing world of Auger electrons,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 80, no. 11-12, pp. 789–803, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Buchegger, F. Perillo-Adamer, Y. M. Dupertuis, and A. B. Delaloye, “Auger radiation targeted into DNA: a therapy perspective,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1352–1363, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. W. Howell, “Auger processes in the 21st century,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 959–975, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Schönfeld, “Calculation of fractional electron capture probabilities,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 49, p. 1353, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Bambynek, B. Crasemann, R. W. Fink et al., “X-ray fluorescence yields, Auger, and Coster-Kronig transition probabilities,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 716–813, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Kibédi, T. W. Burrows, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, P. M. Davidson, and C. W. Nestor, “Evaluation of theoretical conversion coefficients using BrIcc,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 589, no. 2, pp. 202–229, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Rosseland, “Zur Quantentheorie der radioaktiven Zerfallsvorgänge,” Zeitschrift für Physik A, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 173–181, 1923. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. RAdiation Dose Assessment Resource (RADAR), http://www.doseinfo-radar.com/RADARHome.html.
  11. M. G. Stabin and L. C. Q. P. da Luz, “Decay data for internal and external dose assessment,” Health Physics, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 471–475, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Decay Data Evaluation Project, 99mTc: C. Morillon, M. M. Bé, V. P. Chechev, A. Egorov (2012); 111In: V. P. Chechev (2006); 123I: V. Chisté, M. M. Bé (2004); 125I: V. Chisté, M. M. Bé (2010); 201Tl: E. Schönfeld, R. Dersch (2005), http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/DDEPdata.htm.
  13. K. F. Eckerman and A. Endo, MIRD: Radionuclide Data and Decay Schemes, Society of Nuclear Medicine, Reston, Va, USA, 2007.
  14. R. W. Howell, “Radiation spectra for Auger-electron emitting radionuclides: report No. 2 of AAPM Nuclear Medicine Task Group No. 6,” Medical Physics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1371–1384, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Stepanek, “Methods to determine the fluorescence and Auger spectra due to decay of radionuclides or due to a single atomic-subshell ionization and comparisons with experiments,” Medical Physics, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1544–1554, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Pomplun, “Monte Carlo-simulated Auger electron spectra for nuclides of radiobiological and medical interest—a validation with noble gas ionization data,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 88, no. 1-2, pp. 108–114, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. R. S. Hager and E. C. Seltzer, “Internal conversion tables part I: K-, L-, M-shell conversion coefficients for Z=30 to Z=103,” Nuclear Data Sheets A, vol. 4, no. 1–2, pp. 1–11, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  18. F. R. Rösel, H. M. Friess, K. Alder, and H. C. Pauli, “Internal conversion coefficients for all atomic shells ICC values for Z=3067,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 91–289, 1978, ibid vol. 21, p. 291, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. I. M. Band, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, and M. A. Listengarten, “Internal conversion coefficients for E5 and M5 nuclear transitions, 30Z104,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–47, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. O. Dragoun, Z. Plajner, and F. Schmutzler, “Contribution of outer atomic shells to total internal conversion coefficients,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 119–135, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. M. Band, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, and M. A. Listengarten, “Internal conversion coefficients for atomic numbers Z30,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 433–457, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. B. Gove and M. J. Martin, “Log-f tables for beta decay,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 205–219, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Schönfeld, “Tables for the calculation of electron capture probabilities,” Tech. Rep. PTB-6.33-95-2, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  24. W. Bambynek, H. Behrens, M. H. Chen et al., “Orbital electron capture by the nucleus,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 77–221, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. J. Martin and P. H. Blichert-toft, “Radioactive atoms: Auger-electron, α-, β-, γ-, and X-ray data,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 8, no. 1-2, p. 1, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. W. Burrows, The Program RADLST, National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1988.
  27. J. H. Scofield, “Relativistic Hartree Slater values for K and L X-ray emission rates,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121–137, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. Schönfeld and H. Janßen, Untersuchungen zu verknupfungen von konstanten der atomhulle, vol. 37, PTB, Braunschweig, Germany, 1995.
  29. M. M. Bé, V. Chisté, and C. Dulieu, “Detailed calculation of K- and L-Auger electron emission intensities following radioactive disintegration,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 64, no. 10-11, pp. 1435–1439, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. T. Perkins, D. E. Cullen, H. H. Chen, J. H. Hubbell, J. Rathkopf, and J. Scofield, “Tables and graphs of atomic subshell and relaxation data derived from the LLNL evaluated atomic data library (EADL), Z = 1-100,” Tech. Rep. UCRL-50400, Lawrence Livennore National Laboratory, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  31. D. E. Cullen, “Program RELAX: a code designed to calculate atomic relaxation spectra of X-rays and electrons,” Tech. Rep. number UCRLID-II0438, Lawrence Livennore National Laboratory, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  32. M. H. Chen, B. Crasemann, and H. Mark, “Relativistic radiationless transition probabilities for atomic K- and L-shells,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–37, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. J. McGuire, “M–shell Auger, Coster–Kronig, and radiative matrix elements, and Auger and Coster–Kronig transition rates in j–j coupling,” Research Report SC-RR-710835, Sandia Laboratories, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  34. E. J. McGuire, “N–shell Auger, Coster–Kronig, and radiative matrix elements, and Auger and Coster–Kronig transition rates in j–j coupling,” Research Report SAND-75-0443, Sandia Laboratories, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  35. A. I. Kassis, S. J. Adelstein, C. Haydock, and K. S. R. Sastry, “Thallium-201: an experimental and a theoretical radiobiological approach to dosimetry,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1164–1175, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. T. Manson and D. J. Kennedy, “X-ray emission rates in the Hartree Slater approximation,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Storm and H. I. Israel, “Photon cross sections from 1 keV to 100 MeV for elements Z=1 to Z=100,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 565–681, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. O. Krause, “Atomic radiative and radiationless yields for K and L shells,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 307, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. A. Bearden and A. F. Burr, “Reevaluation of X-ray atomic energy levels,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 125–142, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. P. Larkins, “Semiempirical Auger-electron energies for elements 10Z100,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 311–387, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. P. Desclaux, “A multiconfiguration relativistic DIRAC-FOCK program,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. I. M. Band, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, C. W. Nestor Jr., P. O. Tikkanen, and S. Raman, “Dirac-Fock internal conversion coefficients,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 81, no. 1-2, pp. 1–334, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF), NNDC, BNL, http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/index.jsp.
  44. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Radionuclide Transformations, vol. 38 of ICRP publication, Pregamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1983.
  45. E. Schönfeld and H. Janßen, “Calculation of emission probabilities of X-rays and Auger electrons emitted in radioactive disintegration processes,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 595–600, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Endo, Y. Yamagichi, and K. F. Eckerman, “Nuclear decay data for dosimetry calculation: revised data of ICRP publication 38,” Tech. Rep. JAERI 1347, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  47. M. F. Chung and L. H. Jenkins, “Auger electron energies of the outer shell electrons,” Surface Science, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 479–485, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L.T. Dillman, “EDISTR–a computer program to obtain a nuclear decay data base for radiation dosimetry,” Tech. Rep. ORNL/TM-6689, Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  49. M. O. Krause and T. A. Carlson, “Vacancy cascade in the reorganization of Krypton ionized in an inner shell,” Physical Review, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. T. A. Carlson and C. W. Nestor Jr., “Calculation of electron shake-off probabilities as the result of X-ray photoionization of the rare gases,” Physical Review A, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2887–2894, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. L. Nichols, S. M. Qaim, and R. C. Noy, Eds., “Technical meeting on intermediate–term nuclear data needs for medical applications: cross sections and decay data,” Summary Report INDC(NDS)-0596, INDC International Nuclear Data Committee, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  52. T. Kibédi, T. W. Burrows, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, and C. W. Nestor Jr., “Internal conversion coefficients—how good are they now?” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, O. Bersillon, F. Gunsing, E. Bauge, R. Jacqmin, and S. Leray, Eds., p. 57, EDP Sciences, Nice, France, April 2007.
  53. P. Jönsson, X. He, C. Froese Fischer, and I. P. Grant, “The grasp2K relativistic atomic structure package,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 177, no. 7, pp. 597–622, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Fritzsche, “The RATIP program for relativistic calculations of atomic transition, ionization and recombination properties,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 7, pp. 1525–1559, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. M. Patanen, S. Urpelainen, T. Kantia, S. Heinäsmäki, S. Aksela, and H. Aksela, “4f photoionization and subsequent Auger decay in atomic Pb: relativistic effects,” Physical Review A, vol. 83, no. 5, Article ID 053408, 5 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. V. V. Bulgakov, V. I. Kirishchuk, V. T. Kupryashkin et al., “Detection of shift effects in the 936 keV K-line internal conversion transition due to atom ionization after electron capture of 152mEu,” Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, vol. 51, no. 11, p. 1, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  57. K. A. Robertson, Atomic radiations in nuclear decay [Honours thesis], Australian National University, 2010.
  58. T. Kibédi, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, M. Gupta, and A. E. Stuchbery, “Conversion coefficients for superheavy elements,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 313–355, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. J. Stepanek, S. A. Ilvonen, A. A. Kuronen, J. S. Lampinen, S. E. Savolainen, and P. J. Välimäki, “Radiation spectra of 111In, 113mIn and 114mIn,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 667–671, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. V. N. Gerasimov, A. G. Zelenkov, V. M. Kulakov et al., “Study of spectrum of conversion electron from the 2.1726-keV transition in 99mTc placed into the metallic Tc matrix,” Yadernaya Fizika, vol. 34, p. 3, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  61. E. A. Yakushev, A. Kovalík, D. V. Filosofov et al., “An experimental comparison of the K- and L-Auger electron spectra generated in the decays of 140Nd and 111In,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 451–456, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus