Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2012, Article ID 820389, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/820389
Review Article

A Literature Review of the Numerical Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Stent Grafts

1Laboratoire Central de Traitement des Images, Research Center, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada H2L 4M1
2Department of Physiology, Biomedical Science Institute and Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada H3T 1J4
3Industrial Materials Institute, National Research Council of Canada, Boucherville, QC, Canada J4B 6Y4
4Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 1K3
5Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada H2L 4M1
6Département de Radiologie, Hôpital Notre-Dame, CRCHUM, 1560 Sherbrooke est, Montréal, QC, Canada H2L 4M1

Received 1 May 2012; Accepted 16 July 2012

Academic Editor: Fabio Galbusera

Copyright © 2012 David Roy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. L. Eliason and G. R. Upchurch Jr., “Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 13, pp. 1738–1744, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. M. Greenhalgh and J. T. Powell, “Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 5, pp. 452–501, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Waite and J. Fine, Applied Biofluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  4. G. Cloutier, A. Zimmer, F. T. H. Yu, and J. L. Chiasson, “Increased shear rate resistance and fastest kinetics of erythrocyte aggregation in diabetes measured with ultrasound,” Diabetes Care, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1400–1402, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. T. H. Yu, J. K. Armstrong, J. Tripette, H. J. Meiselman, and G. Cloutier, “A local increase in red blood cell aggregation can trigger deep vein thrombosis: evidence based on quantitative cellular ultrasound imaging,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 481–488, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Ma and A. Turan, “Pulsatile non-Newtonian haemodynamics in a 3D bifurcating abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 683–694, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Xenos, S. H. Rambhia, Y. Alemu et al., “Patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction with fluid structure interaction modeling,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 3323–3337, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Sho, H. Nanjo, M. Sho et al., “Arterial enlargement, tortuosity, and intimal thickening in response to sequential exposure to high and low wall shear stress,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 601–612, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. F. Furchgott, “The discovery of endothelium-derived relaxing factor and its importance in the identification of nitric oxide,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 276, no. 14, pp. 1186–1188, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Long, L. Rouet, F. Vitry, J. N. Albertini, C. Marcus, and C. Clement, “Compliance of abdominal aortic aneurysms before and after stenting with tissue doppler imaging: evolution during follow-up and correlation with aneurysm diameter,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Vardoulis, E. Coppens, B. Martin et al., “Impact of aortic grafts on arterial pres-sure: a computational fluid dynamics study,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 42, pp. 704–710, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. D. A. Vorp, “Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1887–1902, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Fromageau, S. Lerouge, R. L. Maurice, G. Soulez, and G. Cloutier, “Noninvasive vascular ultrasound elastography applied to the characterization of experimental aneurysms and follow-up after endovascular repair,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 53, no. 22, pp. 6475–6490, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Deffieux, J. L. Gennisson, J. Bercoff et al., “On the effects of reflected waves in transient shear wave elastography,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2032–2035, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. S. Les, S. C. Shadden, C. A. Figueroa et al., “Quantification of hemodynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms during rest and exercise using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1288–1313, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Burattini and S. Bini, “Physiological interpretation of inductance and low-resistance terms in four-element windkessel models: assessment by generalized sensitivity function analysis,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 739–754, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. J. Wolters, Computational Modelling of Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Library of the Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2009.
  18. M. Auer and T. C. Gasser, “Reconstruction and finite element mesh generation of abdominal aortic aneurysms from computerized tomography angiography data with minimal user interactions,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1022–1028, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. A. Holzapfel, Nonlinear Solids Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 2000.
  20. C. Oomens, M. Brekelmans, and F. Baaijens, Biomechanics: Concepts and Computation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
  21. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method, Elsevier, Burlington, Canada, 2005.
  22. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics, Elsevier, Burlington, Canada, 2005.
  23. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method for Fluid Dynamics, Elsevier, Burlington, Canada, 2005.
  24. D. R. Peterson and J. D. Bronzino, Biomechanics: Principles and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2008.
  25. Y. C. Fung, Biodynamics: Circulation, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  26. Y. C. Fung, Biomechanics: Motion, Flow, Stress, Growth, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  27. Y. C. Fung, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  28. M. L. Raghavan, M. W. Webster, and D. A. Vorp, “Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: assessment using a new mathematical model,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 573–582, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. L. Raghavan and D. A. Vorp, “Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 475–482, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. A. Holzapfel, T. C. Gasser, and R. W. Ogden, “A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models,” Journal of Elasticity, vol. 61, no. 1–3, pp. 1–48, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. F. Rodríguez, C. Ruiz, M. Doblaré, and G. A. Holzapfel, “Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 2, Article ID 021023, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. A. Basciano and C. Kleinstreuer, “Invariant-based anisotropic constitutive models of the healthy and aneurysmal abdominal aortic wall,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 131, no. 2, Article ID 021009, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Rissland, Y. Alemu, S. Einav, J. Ricotta, and D. Bluestein, “Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 131, no. 3, Article ID 031001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. P. Vande Geest, M. S. Sacks, and D. A. Vorp, “The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1324–1334, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. P. V. Geest, D. E. Schmidt, M. S. Sacks, and D. A. Vorp, “The effects of anisotropy on the stress analyses of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 921–932, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. P. Mortier, G. A. Holzapfel, M. De Beule et al., “A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 88–99, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. F. Mohammad, M. N. Nassriq, and A. Saidatul, “Analysis of blood flow, pressure and velocity in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications and Design in Mechanical Engineering, Batu Ferringhi, Penang, Malaysia, October 2009.
  38. S. De Putter, On Patient-Specific Wall Stress Analysis in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Library of the Eindho-ven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherland, 2006.
  39. S. De Putter, B. J. B. M. Wolters, M. C. M. Rutten, M. Breeuwer, F. A. Gerritsen, and F. N. van de Vosse, “Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1081–1090, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. P. Marra, C. P. Daghlian, M. F. Fillinger, and F. E. Kennedy, “Elemental composition, morphology and mechanical properties of calcified deposits obtained from abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 515–520, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Maier, M. W. Gee, C. Reeps, H. H. Eckstein, and W. A. Wall, “Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 511–521, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. Speelman, Biomechanical Analysis for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk Stratification, Datawyse/Universitaire Pers Maastricht, Eindhoven, The Netherland, 2009.
  43. E. Georgakarakos, C. V. Ioannou, Y. Kamarianakis et al., “The role of geometric parameters in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. Georgakarakos, C. V. Ioannou, Y. Papaharilaou, T. Kostas, D. Tsetis, and A. N. Katsamouris, “Peak wall stress does not necessarily predict the location of rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 302–304, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. P. V. Geest, D. H. J. Wang, S. R. Wisniewski, M. S. Makaroun, and D. A. Vorp, “Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1098–1106, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Maier, M. W. Gee, C. Reeps, J. Pongratz, H. H. Eckstein, and W. A. Wall, “A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 3124–3134, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. Y. Volokh and D. A. Vorp, “A model of growth and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1015–1021, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. K. Y. Volokh, “Prediction of arterial failure based on a microstructural bi-layer fiber-matrix model with softening,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 447–453, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. Y. Volokh, “Comparison of biomechanical failure criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2032–2034, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. Schmitt, A. H. Henni, and G. Cloutier, “Ultrasound dynamic micro-elastography applied to the viscoelastic characterization of soft tissues and arterial walls,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1492–1503, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. V. Quaglini, P. Vena, and R. Contro, “A discrete-time approach to the formulation of constitutive models for viscoelastic soft tissues,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–97, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. H. G. Van Oijen, Mechanics and Design of Fiberreinforced Vascular Prostheses, CIP-Data Library Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2003.
  53. G. A. Holzapfel, “Structural and numerical models for the (visco)elastic response of arterial walls with residual stresses,” in Biomechanics of Soft Tissues in Cardiovascular Systems, G. A. Holzapfel and R. W. Ogden, Eds., pp. 109–184, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  54. E. S. Di Martino, G. Guadagni, A. Fumero et al., “Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 647–655, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Y. Papaharilaou, J. A. Ekaterinaris, E. Manousaki, and A. N. Katsamouris, “A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 367–377, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. E. Georgakarakos, C. V. Ioannou, S. Volanis, Y. Papaharilaou, J. Ekaterinaris, and A. N. Katsamouris, “The influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress,” International Angiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 325–333, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. D. H. J. Wang, M. Makaroun, M. W. Webster, and D. A. Vorp, “Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 536–539, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. Z. Y. Li, J. U-King-Im, T. Y. Tang, E. Soh, T. C. See, and J. H. Gillard, “Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 928–935, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. E. A. Van Dam, S. D. Dams, G. W. M. Peters et al., “Non-linear viscoelastic behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm thrombus,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. G. W. H. Schurink, J. M. van Baalen, M. J. T. Visser, and J. H. van Bockel, “Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 501–506, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. Toungara, Contribution à la Prédiction de la Rupture des Anévrismes de l'Aorte Abdominale (AAA) [Ph.D. thesis], École Doctorale Ingénierie—Matériaux Mécanique Energétique Environnement Procédés Production, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 2011.
  62. A. Ayyalasomayajula, J. P. Vande Geest, and B. R. Simon, “Porohyperelastic finite element modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 132, no. 10, Article ID 104502, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. R. Adolph, D. A. Vorp, D. L. Steed et al., “Cellular content and permeability of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 916–926, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  64. S. Polzer and J. Bursa, “Poroelastic model of intraluminal thrombus in FEA of aortic aneurysm,” in IFMBE Proceedings, C. T. Lim and J. C. H. Goh, Eds., vol. 31, pp. 763–767, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  65. E. Georgakarakos, G. S. Georgiadis, C. V. Ioan-nou et al., “Aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular treatment of the aorta: beyond sac pressure and endoleaks,” Vascular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 168–173, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  66. W. M. P. F. Bosman, J. W. Hinnen, D. J. Rixen, and J. F. Hamming, “Effect of stent-graft compliance on endotension after EVAR,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. Z. Li and C. Kleinstreuer, “Fluid-structure interaction effects on sac-blood pressure and wall stress in a stented aneurysm,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 662–671, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Amblard, H. W. L. Berre, B. Bou-Saïd, and M. Brunet, “Analysis of type I endoleaks in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. C. R. Johnston, K. Lee, J. Flewitt, R. Moore, G. M. Dobson, and G. M. Thornton, “The mechanical properties of endovascular stents: an in vitro assessment,” Cardiovascular Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 128–135, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. Z. Li and C. Kleinstreuer, “Computational analysis of type II endoleaks in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 39, no. 14, pp. 2573–2582, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Z. Li and C. Kleinstreuer, “Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 369–382, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. Vad, A. Eskinazi, T. Corbett, T. McGloughlin, and J. P. V. Geest, “Determination of coefficient of friction for self-expanding stent-grafts,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 132, no. 12, Article ID 121007, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. Z. Li and C. Kleinstreuer, “Analysis of biomechanical factors affecting stent-graft migration in an abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2264–2273, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. S. Molony, A. Callanan, E. G. Kavanagh et al., “Fluid-structure interaction of a patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with an endovascular stentgraft,” BioMedical Engineering Online, vol. 8, article 24, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  75. S. T. Kwon, J. E. Rectenwald, and S. Baek, “Intrasac pressure changes and vascular remodeling after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: review and biomechanical model simulation,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 133, no. 1, Article ID 011011, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. R. Moreno, F. Nicoud, L. Veunac et al., “Non-linear-transformation-field to build moving meshes for patient specific blood flow simulations,” in Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference (ECCOMAS CFD '06), P. Wesseling, E. Oñate, and J. Périaux, Eds., TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 2006.
  77. L. Speelman, M. Bosboom, and G. W. H. Schurink, “Biomechanical analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” in Patient-Specific Modeling of the Cardiovascular System, R. C. P. Kerckhoffs, Ed., pp. 95–111, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  78. K. Takashima, R. Shimomura, T. Kitou, H. Terada, K. Yoshinaka, and K. Ikeuchi, “Contact and friction between catheter and blood vessel,” Tribology International, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A. Gupta, S. Sett, S. Varahoor et al., “Investigation of interaction between guidewire and native vessel using finite element analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2010 Simulia Customer Conference, Providence, RI, USA, May 2010.