Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 413783, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/413783
Research Article

Integrative Genomics with Mediation Analysis in a Survival Context

1Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
2Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
3Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Received 28 May 2013; Accepted 23 September 2013

Academic Editor: Lev Klebanov

Copyright © 2013 Szilárd Nemes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Schafer, H. Schwender, S. Merk, C. Haferlach, K. Ickstadt, and M. Dugas, “Integrated analysis of copy number alterations and gene expression: a bivariate assessment of equally directed abnormalities,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 3228–3235, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Nemes, T. Z. Parris, A. Danielsson et al., “Segmented regression, a versatile tool to analyze mRNA levels in relation to DNA copy number aberrations,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Xie and C. Ahn, “Statistical methods for integrating multiple types of high-throughput data,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 620, pp. 511–529, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. K. Solvang, O. C. Lingjærde, A. Frigessi, A. L. Børresen-Dale, and V. N. Kristensen, “Linear and non-linear dependencies between copy number aberrations and mRNA expression reveal distinct molecular pathways in breast cancer,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 12, article 197, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Soneson, H. Lilljebjörn, T. Fioretos, and M. Fontes, “Integrative analysis of gene expression and copy number alterations using canonical correlation analysis,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 11, article 191, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. J. VanderWeele, “Causal mediation analysis with survival data,” Epidemiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 582–585, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Lange and J. V. Hansen, “Direct and indirect effects in a survival context,” Epidemiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 575–581, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, “On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome,” International Journal of Biostatistics, vol. 7, no. 1, article 33, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Chin, W. C. Hahn, G. Getz, and M. Matthew, “Making sense of cancer genomic data,” Genes and Development, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 534–555, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. Cortese, T. H. Scheike, and T. Martinussen, “Flexible survival regression modelling,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–28, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. O. Aalen, “Further results on the non-parametric linear regression model in survival analysis,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 1569–1588, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. A. Lomnicki, “On the distribution of products of random variables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 513–524, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. D. Springer and W. E. Thompson, “The distribution of products of independent random variables,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 511–526, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. C. Craig, “On the frequency function of xy,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1936. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. G. Glen, L. M. Leemis, and J. H. Drew, “Computing the distribution of the product of two continuous random variables,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 451–464, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. W. Oehlert, “A note on the delta method,” The American Statistician, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 27–29, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Tofighi and D. P. MacKinnon, “Rmediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 692–700, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Burton, D. G. Altman, P. Royston, and R. L. Holder, “The design of simulation studies in medical statistics,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 4279–4292, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. E. Jennings, “How do we judge confidence-interval adequacy?” The American Statistician, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 335–337, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Jönsson, J. Staaf, E. Olsson et al., “High-resolution genomic profiles of breast cancer cell lines assessed by tiling BAC array comparative genomic hybridization,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 543–558, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Lim, F. Vaillant, D. Wu et al., “Aberrant iuminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 907–913, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Z. Parris, A. Danielsson, S. Nemes et al., “Clinical implications of gene dosage and gene expression patterns in diploid breast carcinoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 3860–3874, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. N. van Wieringen, K. Unger, G. G. R. Leday et al., “Matching of array CGH and gene expression microarray features for the purpose of integrative genomic analyses,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 13, no. 1, article 80, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Fosen, E. Ferkingstad, O. Borgan, and O. O. Aalen, “Dynamic path analysis-a new approach to analyzing time-dependent covariates,” Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 143–167, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Martinussen, “Dynamic path analysis for event time data: large sample properties and inference,” Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85–101, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Martinussen, S. Vansteelandt, M. Gerster, and J. V. B. Hjelmborg, “Estimation of direct effects for survival data by using the Aalen additive hazards model,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 773–788, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. E. Schadt, J. Lamb, X. Yang et al., “An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 710–717, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Li, B. M. Tesson, G. A. Churchill, and R. C. Jansen, “Critical reasoning on causal inference in genome-wide linkage and association studies,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 493–498, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. Lee, S. Cho, K. Kim, and T. Park, “An integrated approach to infer causal associations among gene expression, genotype variation, and disease,” Genomics, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 269–277, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. C. Lozano, N. Abe, Y. Liu, and S. Rosset, “Grouped graphical Granger modeling for gene expression regulatory networks discovery,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. I110–I118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. Chindelevitch, P.-R. Loh, A. Enayetallah, B. Berger, and D. Ziemek, “Assessing statistical significance in causal graphs,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 13, no. 1, article 35, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. Ferkingstad, A. Frigessi, and H. Lyng, “Indirect genomic effects on survival from gene expression data,” Genome Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, article R58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. P. MacKinnon, C. M. Lockwood, and J. Williams, “Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 99–128, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. P. MacKinnon, C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hoffman, S. G. West, and V. Sheets, “A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects,” Psychological Methods, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 83–104, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. J. Preacher and K. Kelley, “Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects,” Psychological Methods, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 93–115, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. P. MacKinnon and G. Warsi, “A simulation study of mediated effect measures,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 41, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  37. D. Tofighi, D. P. MacKinnon, and M. Yoon, “Covariances between regression coefficient estimates in a single mediator model,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 457–484, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. I. Orlow, D. V. Tommasi, B. Bloom et al., “Evaluation of the clonal origin of multiple primary melanomas using molecular profiling,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 1972–1982, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. I. Ostrovnaya and C. B. Begg, “Testing clonal relatedness of tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization: a statistical challenge,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1358–1367, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. S. Fritz and D. P. MacKinnon, “Required sample size to detect the mediated effect,” Psychological Science, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 233–239, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Jelizarow, V. Guillemot, A. Tenenhaus, K. Strimmer, and A. L. Boulesteix, “Over-optimism in bioinformatics: an illustration,” Bioinformatics, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 1990–1998, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Peng, J. Zhu, A. Bergamaschi et al., “Regularized multivariate regression for identifying master predictors with application to integrative genomic study of breast cancer,” Annals of Applied Statistics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. R. Jornsten, T. Abenius, T. King et al., “Network modeling of the transcriptional effects of copy number aberrations in glioblastoma,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 7, article 486, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. H. Lee, S. W. Kong, and P. J. Park, “Integrative analysis reveals the direct and indirect interactions between DNA copy number aberrations and gene expression changes,” Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 889–896, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Textor, J. Hardt, and S. Knüppel, “DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams,” Epidemiology, vol. 22, no. 5, article 745, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus