Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2013, Article ID 934538, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/934538
Research Article

A General Framework for Modeling Sub- and Ultraharmonics of Ultrasound Contrast Agent Signals with MISO Volterra Series

1Université François Rabelais de Tours, UMR-S930, 37032 Tours, France
2INSERM U930, 37032 Tours, France
3IUT Ville d’Avray, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 92410 ville d’Avray, France
4Département de Physique et d’Électronique, Faculté des Sciences I, Université Libanaise, Hadath, Lebanon

Received 21 December 2012; Accepted 25 January 2013

Academic Editor: Kumar Durai

Copyright © 2013 Fatima Sbeity et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. J. A. Frinking, A. Bouakaz, J. Kirkhorn, F. J. Ten Cate, and N. de Jong, “Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 965–975, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. G. Leighton, The Acoustic Bubble, Academic Press, London, UK, 1994.
  3. P. N. Burns, “Instrumentation for contrast echocardiography,” Echocardiography, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 241–258, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. A. Averkiou, “Tissue Harmonic Imaging,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 2, pp. 1563–1572, October 2000.
  5. P. M. Shankar, P. D. Krishna, and V. L. Newhouse, “Advantages of subharmonic over second harmonic backscatter for contrast-to-tissue echo enhancement,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 395–399, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Basude and M. A. Wheatley, “Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages,” Ultrasonics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 437–444, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Hoff, Acoustic Characterization of Contrast Agents for Medical Ultrasound Imaging, Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001.
  8. K. E. Morgan, J. S. Allen, P. A. Dayton, J. E. Chomas, A. L. Klibaov, and K. W. Ferrara, “Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Contro, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1494–1509, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Marmottant, S. van der Meer, M. Emmer et al., “A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 3499–3505, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. V. Volterra, Theory of Functionals and of Integral and Integro-Differential Equations,, Blackie & Son, Glasgow, UK, 1930.
  11. M. Schetzen, The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  12. O. M. Boaghe and S. A. Billings, “Subharmonic oscillation modeling and MISO Volterra series,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 877–884, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Samakee and P. Phukpattaranont, “Application of MISO Volterra Series for Modeling Subharmonic of Ultrasound Contrast Agent,” International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 445–451, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. V. J. Mathews and G. L. Sicuranza, Polynomial Signal Processing, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  15. C. C. Church, “The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 1510–1521, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Forsberg, W. T. Shi, and B. B. Goldberg, “Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents,” Ultrasonics, vol. 38, no. 1–8, pp. 93–98, 2000. View at Google Scholar