Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2014, Article ID 276589, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/276589
Research Article

A Machine Learning Approach for Specification of Spinal Cord Injuries Using Fractional Anisotropy Values Obtained from Diffusion Tensor Images

Department of Nanobiomedical Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 330-714, Republic of Korea

Received 30 July 2013; Revised 5 November 2013; Accepted 27 November 2013; Published 21 January 2014

Academic Editor: Rong Chen

Copyright © 2014 Bunheang Tay et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. The American Spinal Injury Association, Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal Injured Patients, ASIA, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1982.
  2. The American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia, International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients, ASIA, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1996.
  3. The American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia, International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients, ASIA, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2000.
  4. J. D. Steeves, D. Lammertse, A. Curt et al., “Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures,” Spinal Cord, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 206–221, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Miyanji, J. C. Furlan, B. Aarabi, P. M. Arnold, and M. G. Fehlings, “Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome. Prospective study with 100 consecutive patients,” Radiology, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 820–827, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Lin, R. Li, X. Tang, J. G. Dy, and S. B. Jiang, “Markerless gating for lung cancer radiotherapy based on machine learning techniques,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1555–1563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. A. Norman, S. M. Polyn, G. J. Detre, and J. V. Haxby, “Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 424–430, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Athitsos, J. Alon, and S. Sclaroff, “Efficient nearest neighbor classification using a cascade of approximate similarity measures,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '05), pp. 486–493, June 2005. View at Scopus
  9. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin, “LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 2, no. 3, article 27, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Schölkopf and A. J. Smola, Learning With Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2002.
  11. H. Zare, “FeaLect: Feature seLection by computing statistical scores,” The R Journal, 2010, http://cran.rakanu.com.
  12. J. Liang, S. Yang, and A. Winstanley, “Invariant optimal feature selection: a distance discriminant and feature ranking based solution,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1429–1439, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Robnik-Šikonja and I. Kononenko, “Theoretical and empirical analysis of reliefF and RReliefF,” Machine Learning, vol. 53, no. 1-2, pp. 23–69, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Seo and S. Oh, “High performance feature selection algorithm based on feature clearness (CBFS),” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e40419, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Lee, B. Nomin, and S. Oh, “RFS :efficient feature selection method based on R-value,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 91–99, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Oh, “A new dataset evaluation method based on category overlap,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia, International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients, ASIA, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2003.
  18. K. Dirk-Jan, 2008, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/21130-dti-and-fiber-tracking.
  19. S. Jimmy, 2005, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/8797.
  20. J. Cohen-Adad, H. Leblond, H. Delivet-Mongrain, M. Martinez, H. Benali, and S. Rossignol, “Wallerian degeneration after spinal cord lesions in cats detected with diffusion tensor imaging,” NeuroImage, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1068–1076, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Arlot and A. Celisse, “A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection,” Statistics Surveys, vol. 4, pp. 40–79, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus