Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 470786, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/470786
Research Article

Automatic Identification of Motion Artifacts in EHG Recording for Robust Analysis of Uterine Contractions

1Grupo de Bioelectrónica (I3BH), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n Ed.8B, 46022 Valencia, Spain
2Servicio de Obstetricia, H. U. La Fe, Valencia, Spain

Received 31 May 2013; Accepted 14 October 2013; Published 9 January 2014

Academic Editor: Catherine Marque

Copyright © 2014 Yiyao Ye-Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. A. Wilmink, F. F. Wilms, R. Heydanus, B. W. J. Mol, and D. N. M. Papatsonis, “Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: a report of two cases and review of the literature,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 880–883, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. P. Vinken, C. Rabotti, M. Mischi, and S. G. Oei, “Accuracy of frequency-related parameters of the electrohysterogram for predicting preterm delivery: a review of the literature,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 529–541, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Schlembach, W. L. Maner, R. E. Garfield, and H. Maul, “Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 144, supplement 1, pp. S33–S39, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. M. Miles, M. Monga, and K. S. Richeson, “Correlation of external and internal monitoring of uterine activity in a cohort of term patients,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 137–140, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Devedeux, C. Marque, S. Mansour, G. Germain, and J. Duchene, “Uterine electromyography: a critical review,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 1636–1653, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. E. Garfield and W. L. Maner, “Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 289–295, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. K. Marque, J. Terrien, S. Rihana, and G. Germain, “Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 7, supplement 1, article S5, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Lucovnik, W. L. Maner, L. R. Chambliss et al., “Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 228.e1–228.e10, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Y. Euliano, D. Marossero, M. T. Nguyen, N. R. Euliano, J. Principe, and R. K. Edwards, “Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 54–57, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Rabotti, M. Mischi, J. O. E. H. van Laar, G. S. Oei, and J. W. M. Bergmans, “Inter-electrode delay estimators for electrohysterographic propagation analysis,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 745–761, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Rabotti and M. Mischi, “Two-dimensional estimation of the electrohysterographic conduction velocity,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '10), pp. 4262–4265, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Jezewski, K. Horoba, A. Matonia, and J. Wrobel, “Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 753–767, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Euliano, M. Skowronski, D. Marossero, J. Shuster, and R. Edwards, “Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 803–808, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Y. Euliano, M. T. Nguyen, D. Marossero, and R. K. Edwards, “Monitoring contractions in obese parturients: electrohysterography compared with traditional monitoring,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 1136–1140, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Rabotti, M. Mischi, J. O. E. H. van Laar, G. S. Oei, and J. W. M. Bergmans, “Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 829–841, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Y. Euliano, M. T. Nguyen, S. Darmanjian et al., “Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 208, pp. 66.e1–66.e6, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Hassan, S. Boudaoud, J. Terrien, B. Karlsson, and C. Marque, “Combination of canonical correlation analysis and empirical mode decomposition applied to denoising the labor electrohysterogram,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 2441–2447, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Liang, J. Y. Cheung, and J. D. Z. Chen, “Detection and deletion of motion artifacts in electrogastrogram using feature analysis and neural networks,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 850–857, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. A. M. T. Verhagen, L. J. van Schelven, M. Samsom, and A. J. P. M. Smout, “Pitfalls in the analysis of electrogastrographic recordings,” Gastroenterology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 453–460, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Conforto, T. D'Alessio, and S. Pignatelli, “Optimal rejection of movement artefacts from myoelectric signals by means of a wavelet filtering procedure,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Liang, Z. Lin, and R. W. McCallum, “Artifact reduction in electrogastrogram based on empirical mode decomposition method,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. L. Maner and R. E. Garfield, “Identification of human term and preterm labor using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography data,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 465–473, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. Moslem, M. Khalil, C. Marque, and M. O. Diab, “Energy distribution analysis of uterine electromyography signals,” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 361–366, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Hassan, J. Terrien, C. Muszynski, A. Alexandersson, C. Marque, and B. Karlsson, “Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 60, pp. 1160–1166, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Léman, C. Marque, and J. Gondry, “Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1222–1229, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Maul, W. L. Maner, G. Olson, G. R. Saade, and R. E. Garfield, “Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 297–301, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Terrien, T. Steingrimsdottir, C. Marque, and B. Karlsson, “Synchronization between EMG at different uterine locations investigated using time-frequency ridge reconstruction: comparison of pregnancy and labor contractions,” Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2010, Article ID 242493, 10 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Lucovnik, R. J. Kuon, L. R. Chambliss et al., “Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 150–157, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. Verdenik, M. Pajntar, and B. Leskošek, “Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Fele-Žorž, G. Kavšek, Ž. Novak-Antolič, and F. Jager, “A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 911–922, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Zhu, J. Tong, and Y. Chen, “An ICA-based method for automatic eye blink artifact correction in multi-channel EEG,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Application in Biomedicine, in Conjunction with the 2nd International Symposium & Summer School on Biomedical and Health Engineering, pp. 338–341, May 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Hassan, J. Terrien, C. Marque, and B. Karlsson, “Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: application to uterine electromyogram signals,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 980–986, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. Guyon and A. Elisseeff, “An introduction to variable variable and feature selection,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 46, pp. 1157–1182, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Irimia and L. A. Bradshaw, “Artifact reduction in magnetogastrography using fast independent component analysis,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1059–1073, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Milanesi, N. Martini, N. Vanello, V. Positano, M. F. Santarelli, and L. Landini, “Independent component analysis applied to the removal of motion artifacts from electrocardiographic signals,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 251–261, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Daly, M. Billinger, R. Scherer, and G. Muller-Putz, “On the automated removal of artifacts related to head movement from the EEG,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 21, pp. 427–434, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  37. Y. Ye-Lin, J. Garcia-Casado, G. Prats-Boluda, and J. L. Martinez-De-Juan, “Combined method for reduction of high frequency interferences in surface electroenterogram (EEnG),” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 2358–2370, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Schreiber and A. Schmitz, “Surrogate time series,” Physica D, vol. 142, no. 3-4, pp. 346–382, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. van Gestel, J. A. K. Suykens, B. Baesens et al., “Benchmarking least squares support vector machine classifiers,” Machine Learning, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Rabotti, Characterization of Uterine Activity by Electrohysterography, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2010.
  41. H. Leman and C. Marque, “Rejection of the maternal electrocardiogram in the electrohysterogram signal,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1010–1017, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Marque, C. Bisch, R. Dantas, S. Elayoubi, V. Brosse, and C. Pérot, “Adaptive filtering for ECG rejection from surface EMG recordings,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 310–315, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Matonia, J. Jezewski, K. Horoba, A. Gacek, and P. Labaj, “The maternal ECG suppression algorithm for efficient extraction of the fetal ECG from abdominal signal,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS '06), vol. 1–15, pp. 296–299, September 2006.