Research Article

Resistance Training Exercise Program for Intervention to Enhance Gait Function in Elderly Chronically Ill Patients: Multivariate Multiscale Entropy for Center of Pressure Signal Analysis

Table 1

Patient characteristics and analytical results of the exercise intervention participants.

Participants: (Mean ± SD)TotalPretrainingTrainingPosttrainingDetraining

BMI (kg/m2)25.00 ± 2.8725.07 ± 3.0825.17 ± 3.1624.93 ± 3.12
Substrate supportf (cm2)392.00 ± 85.40441.73 ± 87.72*439.44 ± 84.54*
Single-leg stance with eyes open (s)18.10 ± 22.4933.06 ± 42.8827.01 ± 29.00b24.60 ± 24.38
Timed up-and-go test (s)7.67 ± 2.127.91 ± 2.787.28 ± 2.23
CI of MSE: anterioposterior plane (AP)13.88 ± 3.2014.57 ± 3.5214.89 ± 3.4714.67 ± 3.31
CI of MSE: mediolateral plane (ML)11.95 ± 3.3813.62 ± 3.3113.47 ± 3.7412.71 ± 3.38
postural stability Gait Traditional index (TI)
 The total distance (cm)0.26 ± 0.180.36 ± 0.670.42 ± 0.790.26 ± 0.14
 The total AP distance (cm)0.20 ± 0.150.29 ± 0.520.33 ± 0.600.23 ± 0.13
 The total ML distance (cm)0.17 ± 0.130.21 ± 0.330.25 ± 0.380.11 ± 0.09
 Average rate13.99 ± 0.00313.75 ± 0.01114.01 ± 0.01315.01 ± 0.002
 Average AP rate0.003 ± 0.0020.005 ± 0.0090.005 ± 0.0100.004 ± 0.002
 Average ML rate0.003 ± 0.0020.003 ± 0.0050.004 ± 0.0060.002 ± 0.002
CI of MMSE13.87 ± 1.5614.25 ± 1.33
Age (years old) 67.56 ± 10.70, mean ± standard deviation, range: 47–89 years
14 males, 11 femalesMale: 56%, female: 44%

Paired t-test, value < 0.05. Training/posttraining/detraining versus pretraining.
Note: value: a0.0088; b0.0651; c0.0013; d0.0094; e0.0367.
Note: fSubstrate support is meaning bottom of the foot’s trapezoidal area. After the subjects natural stand, measuring foot standing of its trapezoidal area.