Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 645064, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/645064
MACT: A Manageable Minimization Allocation System
1School of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China
2Department of Common Required Courses, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 312 Anshanxi Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300193, China
3College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 312 Anshanxi Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300193, China
Received 31 October 2013; Revised 5 January 2014; Accepted 16 January 2014; Published 23 February 2014
Academic Editor: Lei Chen
Copyright © 2014 Yan Cui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Linked References
- S. L. Silverman, “From randomized controlled trials to observational studies,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 114–120, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- T. J. Kaptchuk, “The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf?” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 541–549, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- C. J. Weir and K. R. Lees, “Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 705–726, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- J. M. Lachin, “Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 312–326, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- D. R. Taves, “Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 443–453, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- N. W. Scott, G. C. McPherson, C. R. Ramsay, and M. K. Campbell, “The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review,” Controlled Clinical Trials, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 662–674, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- S. J. Pocock and R. Simon, “Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial,” Biometrics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 103–115, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- A. Hagino, C. Hamada, I. Yoshimura, Y. Ohashi, J. Sakamoto, and H. Nakazato, “Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 572–584, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- L. Xiao, P. W. Lavori, S. R. Wilson, and J. Ma, “Comparison of dynamic block randomization and minimization in randomized trials: a simulation study,” Clinical Trials, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- Y. Kenjo, Y. Antoku, K. Akazawa, E. Hanada, N. Kinukawa, and Y. Nose, “An easily customized, random allocation system using the minimization method for multi-Institutional clinical trials,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- H. W. Cai, H. L. Xia, D. Z. Xu, D. H. Gao, and Y. Yan, “A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 706–719, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- H. W. Cai, J. L. Xia, D. H. Gao, and X. M. Cao, “Implementation and experience of a web-based allocation system with Pocock and Simon's minimization methods,” Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 510–513, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- V. Morice, “RandoWeb, an online randomization tool for clinical trials,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 308–314, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
- H. Y. Kim and H. A. Park, “Development and evaluation of data entry templates based on the entity-attribute-value model for clinical decision support of pressure ulcer wound management,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 485–492, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- C. J. C. Burges, “A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–167, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- I. Guyon, J. Weston, S. Barnhill, and V. Vapnik, “Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines,” Machine Learning, vol. 46, no. 1–3, pp. 389–422, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- M. Abbasi, M. A. Abduli, B. Omidvar, and A. Baghvand, “Forecasting municipal solid waste generation by hybrid support vector machine and partial least square model,” International Journal of Environmental Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2013. View at Google Scholar
- H. Wang and G. Huang, “Application of support vector machine in cancer diagnosis,” Medical Oncology, vol. 28, supplement 1, pp. S613–S618, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus