Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 804723, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/804723
Research Article

Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging: Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces

1Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), Segrate, 20090 Milan, Italy
2Laboratory of Neuropsychology, The Foundation of the Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, IRCSS, 20133 Milan, Italy

Received 18 April 2014; Revised 2 July 2014; Accepted 2 July 2014; Published 24 July 2014

Academic Editor: Fabio Babiloni

Copyright © 2014 Matteo Canini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Materials of the paper “Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging: Testing Efficacy and Clinical Ecology of Different Interfaces” include a self-reported questionnaire administrated to all participants to the study. The questionnaire included 16 items measuring the following participant features: the participant frequency of use of touch-screen tablet and of mouse-controlled PC (items 1, 2, and 3), the participant qualitative perception of the familiarity with the touch-screen tablet (item 4), the participant qualitative perception of the comfortableness with the touch-screen tablet (items 5, 6, and 7),the participant qualitative perception of the testing environment (items 8 and 9), the participant fatigue of using sensory functions while interacting with the touch-screen tablet (items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14), the participant fatigue of maintaining the concentration while interacting with the touch-screen tablet (item 15), and the participant time perception of the neuropsychological tests (item 16). Participants were asked to rate each item on a 5 points Likert scale. Scores ranged from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very much).

  1. Supplementary Material