Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2014, Article ID 956917, 4 pages
Research Article

A Note regarding Problems with Interaction and Varying Block Sizes in a Comparison of Endotracheal Tubes

1Department of Statistics, The University of Akron, 302 Buchtel Common, Akron, OH 44325-1913, USA
2Department of Family and Community Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA

Received 31 January 2014; Accepted 1 July 2014; Published 15 July 2014

Academic Editor: Xiao-Qin Xia

Copyright © 2014 Richard L. Einsporn and Zhenyu Jia. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. P. Radesic, C. Winkelman, R. Einsporn, and J. Kless, “Ease of intubation with the Parker Flex-Tip or a standard Mallinckrodt endotracheal tube using a video laryngoscope (GlideScope),” AANA Journal, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 363–372, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Addelman, “The generalized randomized block design,” The American Statistician, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 35–36, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Hinkelmann and O. Kempthorne, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I: Introduction to Experimental Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2008. View at MathSciNet
  4. D. A. Belsley, E. Kuh, and R. E. Welsch, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, Wiley, 2004. View at MathSciNet
  5. D. Harrington, Designs for Clinical Trials: Perspectives on Current Issues, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012.