Comparison of Two Methods Forecasting Binding Rate of Plasma Protein

<table>Relation of <svg height="7.9499998" id="M82" style="vertical-align:-0.13794pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 7.0999999 7.9499998" width="7.0999999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M387 375q0 -16 -17 -31t-29 -15q-9 0 -12 13q-13 74 -80 74q-36 0 -61 -24.5t-25 -56.5t24 -51.5t68 -19.5q33 0 47 2l2 -7l-32 -42q-20 2 -54 2q-45 0 -74 -21.5t-29 -60.5q0 -41 28 -65.5t73 -24.5q78 0 145 67l17 -23q-33 -47 -84.5 -75t-111.5 -28q-70 0 -114.5 35.5
t-44.5 92.5q0 46 38 78t95 45v2q-35 10 -54.5 33t-19.5 52q0 55 53 88.5t122 33.5q67 0 98.5 -23.5t31.5 -49.5z" id="x1D700"></path></g>
</svg> and RMS error on LOO cross-validation.</table>

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Comparison of Two Methods Forecasting Binding Rate of Plasma Protein 