Table 7: Comparison of the methods and accuracy of previous studies and this study.

AuthorMethodFeature numberAccuracySensitivity

Krishnan et al. [36] 40% test data, SVM (poly.)3092.62%92.69%
40% test data, SVM (RBF)93.72%94.50%

Bagui et al. [37] 64% test data, -RNN3096.00%95.09%
64% test data, -RNNBest 398.10%98.05%

Sweilam et al. [38] PSO + SVM3093.52%91.52%
QPSO + SVM93.06%90.00%

Mangasarian et al. [39] 10-CV, MSM-TBest 397.50%

Mert et al. [40]10-CV, PNN3 (2IC + DWT)96.31%98.88%
LOO, PNN97.01%97.78%

Zheng et al. [41]-SVM697.38%

This study10-CV, -NN1 feature reduced by ICA91.03%94.67%
40% test, -NN92.56%94.02%
10-CV, ANN90.50%96.91%
40% test, ANN90.89%97.00%
10-CV, RBFNN90.49%96.63%
40% test, RBFNN89.98%96.01%
10-CV, SVM (linear)90.33%96.35%
40% test, SVM (linear)90.01%95.00%
10-CV, SVM (quadratic)89.98%95.24%
40% test, SVM (quadratic)91.01%96.42%
10-CV, SVM (RBF)90.86%97.47%
40% test, SVM (RBF)91.03%97.56%