Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2015, Article ID 358638, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/358638
Research Article

Novel Virtual User Models of Mild Cognitive Impairment for Simulating Dementia

1Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Information Technologies Institute (ITI), P.O. Box 60361, 6th Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
2Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Argonafton & Filellinon Street, 38221 Volos, Greece
3Pan-Hellenic Federation of Alzheimer’s disease and Related Disorders, 13 P. Syndika Street, 546 43 Thessaloniki, Greece

Received 10 October 2014; Revised 23 January 2015; Accepted 4 February 2015

Academic Editor: Pietro Cipresso

Copyright © 2015 Sofia Segkouli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. J. Czaja and C. C. Lee, “The impact of aging on access to technology,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 341–349, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. G. Turnbull, C. M. Chewar, and D. S. McCrickard, “Are cognitive architectures mature enough to evaluate notification systems,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP '03), Las Vegas, Nev, USA, June 2003.
  3. D. Sloan, M. T. Atkinson, C. Machin, and Y. Li, “The potential of adaptive interfaces as an accessibility aid for older web users,” in Proceedings of the International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '10), ACM, April 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. DeCarli, B. L. Miller, G. E. Swan, T. Reed, P. A. Wolf, and D. Carmelli, “Cerebrovascular and brain morphologic correlates of mild cognitive impairment in the national heart, lung, and blood institute twin study,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 643–647, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. Taatgen and J. R. Anderson, “The past, present, and future of cognitive architectures,” Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 693–704, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. E. Ritter and R. M. Young, “Embodied models as simulated users: introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Sun, “Introduction to computational modeling,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, R. Sun, Ed., pp. 3–19, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. R. Anderson and C. Lebiere, The Atomic Components of Thought, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1998.
  9. D. E. Kieras and D. E. Meyer, “An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 391–438, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. E. John and D. E. Kieras, “The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 320–351, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. P. M. Langdon, M. F. Gonzalez, and P. Biswas, “Designing studies for the requirements and modelling of users for an accessible set-top box,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologies, pp. 203–212, Valparaiso, Chile, 2010.
  12. J. Mankoff, H. Fait, and R. Juang, “Evaluating accessibility by simulating the experiences of users with vision or motor impairments,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 505–517, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Sutterer, O. Droegehorn, and K. David, “UPOS: user profile ontology with situation-dependent preferences support,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction (ACHI '08), pp. 230–235, IEEE, February 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Trafton, L. Hiatt, A. Harrison, F. Tanborello, S. Khemlani, and A. Schultz, “ACT-R/E: an embodied cognitive architecture for human-robot interaction,” Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–55, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. D. Byrne, “ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 41–84, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. J. Wong, E. T. Cokely, and L. J. Schooler, “An online database of ACT-R parameters: towards a transparent community-based approach to model development,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM '10), pp. 282–286, August 2010. View at Scopus
  17. D. D. Salvucci, E. R. Boer, and A. Liu, “Toward an integrated model of driver behavior in cognitive architecture,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1779, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Razmerita, A. Angehrn, and T. Nabeth, “On the role of user models and user modeling in Knowledge Management Systems,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI '03), pp. 450–456, 2003.
  19. D. Heckmann and A. Krueger, “A user modeling markup language (UserML) for ubiquitous computing,” in User Modeling 2003: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modeling (UM '03), Johnstown, Pa, USA, June 22–26, vol. 2702 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 393–397, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Serna, H. Pigot, and V. Rialle, “Modeling the progression of Alzheimer's disease for cognitive assistance in smart homes,” User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 415–438, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Biswas, P. Robinson, and P. Langdon, “Designing inclusive interfaces through user modeling and simulation,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Bellamy, B. John, and S. Kogan, “Deploying CogTool: integrating quantitative usability assessment into real-world software development,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '11), pp. 691–700, ACM, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. E. Nutter-Upham, A. J. Saykin, L. A. Rabin et al., “Verbal fluency performance in amnestic MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints,” Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Kaklanis, P. Moschonas, K. Moustakas, and D. Tzovaras, “Virtual user models for the elderly and disabled for automatic simulated accessibility and ergonomy evaluation of designs,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 403–425, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Kaklanis, P. Biswas, Y. Mohamad et al., “Towards standardisation of user models for simulation and adaptation purposes,” Universal Access in the Information Society, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Vanderdonckt, “A MDA-compliant environment for developing user interfaces of information systems,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE '05), pp. 16–31, June 2005. View at Scopus
  27. M. Beckmann, U. Yilmaz, G. Pöhler, and A. Wegerich, “A framework for task accomplishment using an ACT-R simulation,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM '12), pp. 127–128, Berlin, Germany, April 2012. View at Scopus
  28. W. E. Hick, “On the rate of gain of information,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–26, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. R. Hyman, “Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 188–196, 1953. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. M. Fitts, “The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 381–391, 1954. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Moschonas, A. Tsakiris, I. Paliokas, and D. Tzovaras, “User interfaces accessibility assessment using virtual user models,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Personalisable Media Systems & Smart Accessibility, Istanbul, Turkey, 2012.
  32. B. Chikhaoui and H. Pigot, “Analytical model based evaluation of human machine interfaces using cognitive modeling,” International Journal of Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 252–261, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  33. Z. S. Nasreddine, N. A. Phillips, V. Bédirian et al., “The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 695–699, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. Kaplan, H. Goodglass, and S. Weintraub, Boston Naming Test, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1983.
  35. L. T. Connor, A. Spiro III, L. K. Obler, and M. L. Albert, “Change in object naming ability during adulthood,” Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. P203–P209, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. E. Roth, “Die Geschwindigkeit der Verarbeitung von Information und ihr Zusammenhang mit Intelligenz/The speed of information processing and ist relation to intelligence,” Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 616–622, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  37. M. L. Mitchell and J. M. Jolley, Research Design Explained, Wadsworth Publishing, Cengage Learning, 8th edition, 2012.
  38. J. Lawrance, R. Bellamy, and M. Burnett, “Scents in programs: does information foraging theory apply to program maintenance?” in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC '07), pp. 15–22, September 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus