Review Article

An Overview of Biomolecular Event Extraction from Scientific Documents

Table 5

Core event extraction performance comparison. BioNLP shared task comparison results in recall/precision/F-score (%) on the test set for Task 1 (core event extraction). (A) abstracts only and (F) full papers. Data extracted from BioNLP-ST 2009, BioNLP-ST 2011, and BioNLP-ST 2013 overviews [51, 52, 109].

YearSystemEvent typeTotal
Simple BindingRegulation

2009UTurku
Björne et al. [86]
(A)64.21/77.45/70.2140.06/49.82/44.4135.63/45.87/40.1146.73/58.48/51.95

2010Miwa
Miwa et al. [87]
(A)65.31/76.44/70.4452.16/53.08/52.6235.93/46.66/40.6048.62/58.96/53.29

2011FAUST
Riedel et al. [111]
(A)
(F)
66.16/81.04/72.85
75.58/78.23/76.88
45.53/58.09/51.05
40.97/44.70/42.75
39.38/58.18/46.97
34.99/48.24/40.56
50.00/67.53/57.46
47.92/58.47/52.67
UMass
Riedel and McCallum [104]
(A)
(F)
64.21/80.74/71.54
75.58/83.14/79.18
43.52/60.89/50.76
41.67/47.62/44.44
38.78/55.07/45.51
34.72/47.51/40.12
48.74/65.94/56.05
47.84/59.76/53.14

2013EVEX
Hakala et al. [91]
(F)73.83/79.56/76.5941.14/44.77/42.8832.41/47.16/38.4145.44/58.03/50.97
TEES-2.1
Björne and Salakoski [97]
(F)74.19/79.64/76.8242.34/44.34/43.3233.08/44.78/38.0546.17/56.32/50.74
BioSEM
Bui et al. [99]
(F)67.71/86.90/76.1147.45/52.32/49.7628.19/49.06/35.8042.47/62.83/50.68