Research Article
Application of Random Forest Survival Models to Increase Generalizability of Decision Trees: A Case Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Table 2
Assessment of performance of different tree construction methods using either training or test sets.
| ā | -index | IBS | ā | Training set | Test set | Percent change | Training set | Test set | Percent change |
| Saturated tree | 0.872 (0.863, 0.882) | 0.634 (0.528, 0.743) | 27% | 0.088 (0.082, 0.094) | 0.224 (0.157, 0.298) | 150% | Pruned tree | 0.753 (0.740, 0.768) | 0.699 (0.570, 0.824) | 7% | 0.145 (0.138, 0.151) | 0.166 (0.113, 0.221) | 14% | RSF | 0.710 (0.693, 0.729) | 0.716 (0.609, 0.857) | 0.08% | 0.163 (0.156, 0.169) | 0.163 (0.114, 0.210) | 0.1% |
|
|