Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2015, Article ID 934382, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/934382
Research Article

Effects of Electrode Position on Spatiotemporal Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses: A 3D Computational Model Study

1School of Electrical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 680-749, Republic of Korea
2Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 330-714, Republic of Korea
3Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA

Received 26 September 2014; Revised 11 January 2015; Accepted 13 January 2015

Academic Editor: Moisés Santillán

Copyright © 2015 Soojin Kang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. B. Firszt, L. K. Holden, R. M. Reeder, and M. W. Skinner, “Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Buechner, C. Frohne-Buechner, P. Boyle, R.-D. Battmer, and T. Lenarz, “A high rate n-of-m speech processing strategy for the first generation Clarion cochlear implant,” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 868–875, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. A. Bruce, J. E. H. M. Bates, C. Melling, D. Mawman, and K. M. J. Green, “Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1444–1447, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. L. Hughes and P. J. Abbas, “Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 1538–1547, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. D. Baumgartner, A. Jappel, C. Morera et al., “Outcomes in adults implanted with the FLEXsoft electrode,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 579–586, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. K. Shepherd, S. Hatsushika, and G. M. Clark, “Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation,” Hearing Research, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 108–120, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. H. M. Frijns, S. L. de Snoo, and R. Schoonhoven, “Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea,” Hearing Research, vol. 87, no. 1-2, pp. 170–186, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. J. Briaire and J. H. M. Frijns, “Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea,” Hearing Research, vol. 148, no. 1-2, pp. 18–30, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Mino, J. T. Rubinstein, C. A. Miller, and P. J. Abbas, “Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. A. Miller, P. J. Abbas, K. V. Nourski, N. Hu, and B. K. Robinson, “Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties,” Hearing Research, vol. 175, pp. 200–214, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. C. Liberman and M. E. Oliver, “Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 163–173, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Woo, C. A. Miller, and P. J. Abbas, “The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a Computer Model Study,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 283–296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. R. Arnesen and K. K. Osen, “The cochlear nerve in the cat: topography, cochleotopy, and fiber spectrum,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 661–678, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. T. Gillespie, “Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 81, no. 25, pp. 2340–2361, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Woo, C. A. Miller, and P. J. Abbas, “Biophysical model of an auditory nerve fiber with a novel adaptation component,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2177–2180, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Glueckert, K. Pfaller, A. Kinnefors, H. Rask-Andersen, and A. Schrott-Fischer, “The human spiral ganglion: new insights into ultrastructure, survival rate and implications for cochlear implants,” Audiology and Neurotology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 258–273, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Stöver and M. Diensthuber, “Molecular biology of hearing,” GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 10, Article ID Doc06, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. C. A. Miller, P. J. Abbas, J. T. Rubinstein, B. K. Robinson, A. J. Matsuoka, and G. Woodworth, “Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation,” Hearing Research, vol. 119, no. 1-2, pp. 142–154, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. S. Spach and J. M. Kootsey, “Relating the sodium current and conductance to the shape of transmembrane and extracellular potentials by simulation: effects of propagation boundaries,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 743–755, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. A. Miller, B. K. Robinson, J. F. Hetke, P. J. Abbas, and K. V. Nourski, “Feasibility of using silicon-substrate recording electrodes within the auditory nerve,” Hearing Research, vol. 198, no. 1-2, pp. 48–58, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. C. Brown, “Antidromic responses of single units from the spiral ganglion,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1835–1847, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Rattay, P. Lutter, and H. Felix, “A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes,” Hearing Research, vol. 153, no. 1-2, pp. 43–63, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. A. Miller, P. J. Abbas, B. K. Robinson, J. T. Rubinstein, and A. J. Matsuoka, “Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation,” Hearing Research, vol. 130, no. 1-2, pp. 197–218, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. A. Verveen, Fluctuation in Excitability, Drukkerij Holland N.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1961.
  25. F. Zhang, C. A. Miller, B. K. Robinson, P. J. Abbas, and N. Hu, “Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 356–372, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. A. Miller, N. Hu, F. Zhang, B. K. Robinson, and P. J. Abbas, “Changes across time in the temporal responses of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 122–137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. A. Cartee, C. A. Miller, and C. van den Honert, “Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses,” Hearing Research, vol. 215, no. 1-2, pp. 10–21, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. Javel and R. K. Shepherd, “Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure,” Hearing Research, vol. 140, no. 1-2, pp. 45–76, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. J. Long, T. A. Holden, G. H. McClelland et al., “Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 293–304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. H. Goldwyn, S. M. Bierer, and J. A. Bierer, “Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration,” Hearing Research, vol. 268, no. 1-2, pp. 93–104, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Hanekom, “Three-dimensional spiraling finite element model of the electrically stimulated cochlea,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 300–315, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. E. Smit, T. Hanekom, and J. J. Hanekom, “Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 363–373, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus