Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2016, Article ID 7141050, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7141050
Research Article

Alternative Confidence Interval Methods Used in the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, 33343 Mersin, Turkey

Received 29 February 2016; Revised 11 May 2016; Accepted 5 June 2016

Academic Editor: Po-Hsiang Tsui

Copyright © 2016 Semra Erdoğan and Orekıcı Temel Gülhan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Erdoğan, Bilim ve Metafizik Üzerine Tarihsel Bir Soruşturma, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, İstanbul, Turkey, 1st edition, 2011.
  2. X. H. Zhou, N. A. Obuchowski, and D. K. McClish, Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 2002.
  3. G. Yasemin, “Tani testi çalişmalarinda metodolojik standartlarin kullanilmasi,” Ankara Üniversitesi tip Fakültesi Mecmuasi, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 259–264, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. D. M. Hawkins, J. A. Garrett, and B. Stephenson, “Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 20, no. 13, pp. 1987–2001, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Wenzel and A. Zapf, “Difference of two dependent sensitivities and specificities: comparison of various approaches,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 705–718, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. A. Agresti and Y. Min, “Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 729–740, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1990.
  8. M. W. Fagerland, S. Lydersen, and P. Laake, “Recommended tests and confidence intervals for paired binomial proportions,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 2850–2875, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. G. Bonett and R. M. Price, “Adjusted wald confidence interval for a difference of binomial proportions based on paired data,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 479–488, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. J. Clopper and E. S. Pearson, “The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial,” Biometrika, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 404–413, 1934. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Agresti and B. A. Coull, “Approximate is better than ‘exact’ for interval estimation of binomial proportions,” The American Statistician, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 119–126, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. G. Newcombe, “Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 22, pp. 2635–2650, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. E. Vollset, “Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 809–824, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Tango, “Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 891–908, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. Yang, X. Sun, and J. W. Hardin, “A non-iterative implementation of Tango's score confidence interval for a paired difference of proportions,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1336–1342, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Lange and E. Brunner, “Sensitivity, specificity and ROC-curves in multiple reader diagnostic trials—a unified, nonparametric approach,” Statistical Methodology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 490–500, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. E. Brunner and U. Munzel, “The nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem: asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Dickel, B. Kreft, O. Kuss et al., “Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 294–302, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M.-L. Tang, M.-H. Ling, L. Ling, and G. Tian, “Confidence intervals for a difference between proportions based on paired data,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 86–96, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M.-L. Tang, N.-S. Tang, and I. S. F. Chan, “Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 23, pp. 3565–3579, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus