Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2017, Article ID 2938504, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2938504
Research Article

Assessment of Iterative Closest Point Registration Accuracy for Different Phantom Surfaces Captured by an Optical 3D Sensor in Radiotherapy

1Institute for Information Technology and Communication Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39016 Magdeburg, Germany
2Clinic for Radiotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Straße 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Gerald Krell; ed.ugvo@llerk

Received 4 July 2016; Revised 30 September 2016; Accepted 25 October 2016; Published 9 January 2017

Academic Editor: Ayman El-Baz

Copyright © 2017 Gerald Krell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Van Dyk, T. Kron, G. Bauman, and J. J. Battista, “Tomotherapy: a ‘revolution’ in radiation therapy,” Physics in Canada, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. M. Kjer and J. Wilm, Evaluation of surface registration algorithms for PET motion correction [Ph.D. thesis], Technical University of Denmark, DTU, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark, 2010.
  3. C. Bert, K. G. Metheany, K. Doppke, and G. T. Y. Chen, “A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup,” Medical Physics, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 2753–2762, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. P. J. Schöffel, W. Harms, G. Sroka-Perez, W. Schlegel, and C. P. Karger, “Accuracy of a commercial optical 3D surface imaging system for realignment of patients for radiotherapy of the thorax,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 3949–3963, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Godin, M. Rioux, and R. Baribeau, “Three-dimensional registration using range and intensity information,” in Proceedings of the Processing and Analysis of 3D Data, vol. 2350 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 279–290, Boston, Mass, USA, October 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Wiencierz, K. Kruppa, and L. Lüdemann, “Clinical validation of two surface imaging systems for patient positioning in percutaneous radiotherapy,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03749.
  7. T. Alderliesten, J.-J. Sonke, A. Betgen et al., “Accuracy evaluation of a 3-dimensional surface imaging system for guidance in deep-inspiration breath-hold radiation therapy,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 536–542, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. L. I. Cerviño, T. Pawlicki, J. D. Lawson, and S. B. Jiang, “Frame-less and mask-less cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: a feasibility study,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1863–1873, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. P. Shah, T. Dvorak, M. S. Curry, D. J. Buchholz, and S. L. Meeks, “Clinical evaluation of interfractional variations for whole breast radiotherapy using 3-dimensional surface,” Practical Radiation Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Fassi, J. Schaerer, M. Riboldi, D. Sarrut, and G. Baroni, “An image-based method to synchronize cone-beam CT and optical surface tracking,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 16, no. 2, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. D. B. Wiant, S. Wentworth, J. M. Maurer, C. L. Vanderstraeten, J. A. Terrell, and B. J. Sintay, “Surface imaging-based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 15, no. 6, article 4957, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  12. T. Luhmann, “Close range photogrammetry for industrial applications,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 558–569, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. R. Y. Tsai, “A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses,” in Radiometry, L. B. Wolff, S. A. Shafer, and G. Healey, Eds., pp. 221–244, Jones and Bartlett, Burlington, Mass, USA, 1992, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=136913.136938. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Rusinkiewicz and M. Levoy, “Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM '01), pp. 145–152, Quebec City, Canada, June 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. W. Eggert, A. Lorusso, and R. B. Fisher, “Estimating 3-D rigid body transformations: a comparison of four major algorithms,” Machine Vision and Applications, vol. 9, no. 5-6, pp. 272–290, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K.-L. Low, Linear Least-Squares Optimization for Point-to-Plane ICP Surface Registration, Chapel Hill University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2004.
  17. N. J. Mitra, N. Gelfand, H. Pottmann, and L. Guibas, “Registration of point cloud data from a geometric optimization perspective,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Geometry Processing (SGP '04), pp. 22–31, Nice, France, July 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Myronenko and X. Song, “Point set registration: coherent point drift,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2262–2275, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. Iterative Closest Point—File Exchange—MATLAB Central, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/27804-iterative-closest-point.
  20. Finite Iterative Closest Point—File Exchange—MATLAB Central, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24301-finite-iterative-closest-point.
  21. The Simple GUI program for point clouds Registration—File Exchange—MATLAB Central, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/35019- the- simple- gui-program- forpoint-clouds-registration.
  22. P. Bergström and O. Edlund, “Robust registration of point sets using iteratively reweighted least squares,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 543–561, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. Iterative Closest Point Method—File Exchange—MATLAB Central, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/12627-iterative-closest-point-method.
  24. S. von Enzberg, E. Lilienblum, and B. Michaelis, “A physical simulation approach for active photogrammetric 3D measurement systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC '11), pp. 1–5, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. D. Münch, B. Combés, and S. Prima, “A modified ICP algorithm for normal-guided surface registration,” in Proceedings of the Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging, vol. 7623 of Proceedings of SPIE, San Diego, Calif, USA, February 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar