Review Article
Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey
Table 17
Bayesian classifier.
| Reference | Descriptor | Image type | Number of images | Key findings |
| Kendall and Flynn [129] | Features extracted using DCT method. | Mammogram | | Bayesian classifier obtained 100.00% sensitivity with 64.00% specificity. |
| Oleksyuk et al. [130] | | — | — | Bayesian method obtained 86.00% with 80.00% specificity. |
| Burling-Claridge et al. [131] | Statistical and LBP features extracted. | Mammogram | 322/410 | Bayesian method obtained % and % Accuracy on MIAS and Inbreast image datasets (using statistical features). Bayesian method obtained % and % Accuracy on MIAS and Inbreast image datasets (using LBP). |
| Raghavendra et al. [132] | Gabor wavelet transform utilized for feature extraction. | Mammogram | 690 | Locality Sensitive Discriminant Analysis (LSDA) for the data reduction. NB obtained 84.34% Accuracy and 83.69% Sensitivity with 90.86% Specificity. |
| Pérez et al. [133] | 23 features utilized. | Mammogram | — | UFilter feature selection methods utilized and its efficiency verified by Wilcoxon statistical test. |
| Rashmi et al. [134] | 10 features utilized. | — | — | Benign and malignant tumors have been classified. |
| Gatuha and Jiang [135] | 10 features utilized. | — | — | They built an android based benign and malignant tumor classifier. Their obtained Accuracy is 96.4% |
|
|