Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Computational Paradigms for Mental Health

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 7048676 |

Elisa Pedroli, Patrizia Padula, Andrea Guala, Maria Teresa Meardi, Giuseppe Riva, Giovanni Albani, "A Psychometric Tool for a Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Approach for Dyslexia", Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2017, Article ID 7048676, 6 pages, 2017.

A Psychometric Tool for a Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Approach for Dyslexia

Academic Editor: Issam El Naqa
Received26 May 2016
Accepted19 Jan 2017
Published13 Feb 2017


Dyslexia is a chronic problem that affects the life of subjects and often influences their life choices. The standard rehabilitation methods all use a classic paper and pencil training format but these exercises are boring and demanding for children who may have difficulty in completing the treatments. It is important to develop a new rehabilitation program that would help children in a funny and engaging way. A Wii-based game was developed to demonstrate that a short treatment with an action video game, rather than phonological or orthographic training, may improve the reading abilities in dyslexic children. According to the results, an approach using cues in the context of a virtual environment may represent a promising tool to improve attentional skills. On the other hand, our results do not demonstrate an immediate effect on reading performance, suggesting that a more prolonged protocol may be a future direction.

1. Introduction

Dyslexia affects the ability to obtain accurate and fluent reading skills in children without neurological impairment who have a normal IQ score. Among Italian young people, the reported prevalence of dyslexia is between 2.5% and 3.5% [1]. A student with some reading problems in the 1st grade has a 90% probability of showing the same deficit in the 4th grade and 75% in high school [2]. In dyslexia, both genetics and environmental factors are important and strongly related. Twin studies have shown low heritability in countries with low levels of reading education, while high heritability has been found in those countries with higher levels [3]. However, the importance of genetic factors is about 54% to 75%, with 68% for identical twins and 50% for children having relatives with dyslexia [2]. A combination of many genetic and environmental factors probably causes dyslexia [4].

Subjects with dyslexia may show specific patterns of atypical brain activation during reading or phonological tasks. For example, one patient presents hypoactivation of the left temporoparietal cortex, the left prefrontal cortex, and the left fusiform gyrus. Structural MRI studies show several abnormalities such as a decrease in grey matter volume, reduced cerebral white matter gyrification, or a bigger corpus callosum [5, 6].

Children with dyslexia may exhibit deficits in both accuracy and speed during reading tasks. Usually, if a child reads slowly, he can make fewer mistakes. Besides, children with dyslexia may show poor phonological skills. Initially, this deficit may involve the pronunciation of words. Different expressions of phonological difficulty depend on different kinds of orthographies (consistent or less consistent orthographies) [2, 7].

Dyslexia is a chronic problem that affects the life of subjects and often influences their life choices. Only a few dyslexic patients decide to continue studies in higher education and those who do may face several difficulties during the years. From the psychological point of view, some students do not want to be recognized as dyslexic in order to avoid discrimination from both professors and other students. This attitude leads the student to reject the use of the modifications provided by the school. Other learners may refuse the modifications to prove that they are able to complete the tests as easily as all the other students. Generally, dyslexic students prefer professors who use innovative formats and provide access to the study material before the lessons and in several formats. Obviously, these students prefer oral assessment because it allows them to present their best [8]. Technology offers great tools to support dyslexic children in their educational careers; Universal Design for Learning (UDL) can represent the future of schools [9], because it helps dyslexic students to achieve their educational goals.

Many dyslexic adults may have difficulty in finding an adequate job. As de Beer et al. [10] showed in their review, the structured corporate environment is stressful and not supportive of dyslexic employees. In this kind of work environment, the positive characteristics of dyslexic people (creativity, solving problems, and persistence) may be overshadowed by the negative ones (problems in reading or writing, slowness, and negative feelings about dyslexia). It often happens that dyslexic people become entrepreneurs in order to open a new business and work for themselves.

Unfortunately, there is no agreement about the gold standard in the rehabilitation of dyslexia. Regardless of the method, it is clear that the best treatment includes intensive sessions, explicit instructions for the exercises, single person or small group implementation, and starting as soon as possible, even before the diagnosis if possible. It is also important to give special attention to the phonological awareness and compensative strategies [11].

All the standard methods use a classic paper and pencil format but the exercises are boring and demanding for children who may have difficulty in completing the treatments [12]. It is crucial to develop a new rehabilitation program that could help children with their problem in a funny and engaging way. Franceschini and colleagues used a Wii-based game in order to demonstrate that a short treatment with an action video game, rather than phonological or orthographic training, may improve the reading abilities in dyslexic children. They showed that training attentional skills improved the reading speed without reducing the accuracy in reading [12].

Several current rumors about Virtual Reality mean an explosive mix of several disciplines for those who worked in the field for several years [13]. There is a natural trade-off between technological complexity and psychological needs, particularly when speaking about children. With this study, we aimed to plan a platform for an experimental task, complete enough to catch a behavioral parameter and useful for a psychological analysis of dyslexic children.

In building such a platform, we opted for a contactless solution, that is, with the sensor posed in front of the participant instead of an accelerometer or other sensors worn by the participants. This allowed us to keep the experimental setting as unobtrusive and transparent as possible for the children. The technical solution we adopted was the use of a Kinect, possible thanks to the use of NeuroVirtual 3D software, through the VRPN interface [14]. The approach and software already had been used in a clinical setting, for the Neglect [15], and explained both computational properties [16] and behavioral aspects [1720].

The use of NeuroVirtual 3D allowed us to program automatic gesture recognition, involving the children in an active experimental setting and eliciting the needed psychological engagement for this kind of population.

Moreover, the automatic classification, recognition, and recording of participants’ behavioral responses are in line with the computational psychometric paradigm highlighted by Cipresso in his seminal paper [21], where he used a Virtual Classroom to verify the idea.

Adams and colleagues proposed a Virtual Classroom as a tool to increase motivation in children with attentional deficit [22], while some authors proposed VR as a test to identify the visuospatial strengths in dyslexia [23]. In the present study, we propose a Virtual Reality training for attention in order to improve the reading skills in a sample of dyslexic children.

2. Methods

2.1. Sample

Ten children (2 females and 8 males) were analyzed at the Ospedale Castelli of Verbania.

The criteria for participation were the following: (1) age between 9 and 12 years; (2) diagnosis of dyslexia (with/without dysgraphia and dyscalculia). The exclusion criteria were the following: (1) comorbidity with other neuropsychiatric disorders (ADHD, etc.); (2) motor impairment that would not allow the interaction with the system; (3) other neurological or psychiatric diseases.

These subjects were 10.6 + 1.4 years old (mean + standard deviation) and had 5.6 + 1.3 years of education. The demographic characteristics of each participant are reported in Table 1.

IDGenderAge (years)Education (years)


At the time, there was no control group.

2.2. Materials
2.2.1. Hardware

The VR system consisted of a standard laptop and a motion sensing input device, Microsoft’s Kinect, and an audio system. The tracking system consisted of an infrared tracking system camera, which was placed on the table near the laptop.

2.2.2. Software

All the virtual environments were developed with NeuroVR. This new software allows normal users to customize several virtual environments according to their needs. Users did not need to have programming skills; all the objects easily were placed into the preexisting environments using an icon-based interface. The tasks took place in the same Virtual Classroom, where patients were sitting at a desk and looking at the blackboard (Figure 1).

All the visual stimuli were shown on the blackboard and the tasks were explained by a voice. All the instructions were presented before the tasks and repeated until the child understood.

To respond to a target, the children had to raise one extended arm laterally and stop when the hand reached shoulder height.

All subjects had to do three different tasks.

In the first one, they had to respond when a target appeared on the blackboard within a series of objects. All the stimuli were 3D objects and the target changed in every session.

During the second task, different letters were presented on the blackboard and the children had to respond only when one letter (i.e., the letter “G”) appeared after another letter (i.e., the letter “A”).

In the last exercise, the patients listened to a story and had to respond only when one of the four colors on the blackboard had been named related to a given category (i.e., “clothes”).

2.3. Procedure

In order to assess the reading skills and the level of attention before and after the training, three tasks were used:(i)Reading test of words and not words: patients had to read several lists of words with different characteristics: words or not words, short or long, and high or low frequency.(ii)Attentional Blink Task (ABT- [24]): patients had to see a series of letters and then answer two questions: “Which letter is white: B, L, S?” “There is the letter “X”?” (Figure 2)(iii)Posner’s task [25]: participants had to press a button when a target (X) appeared on the screen. This could happen in three different situations. In the first type of task, the location of the target was identified by a number (that indicated the location of the target) before each single target presentation under the fixation point. In the second type of task, the probable position of the target was shown before the presentation of all targets. In the last one, there was no cue about the position of the target (Figure 3).

In order to assess the usability, the “System Usability Scale” (SUS, [26]) was submitted at the end of the four weeks of treatment.

The group received the training for 30–45 minutes a day, 2 days a week, for four weeks.

All the tasks took place in a virtual environment that reproduced a classroom; the child was sitting at a bench and could interface with the blackboard to carry out certain tasks that the teacher’s voice explained.

All the sessions took place in a quiet room in the hospital and the environment was controlled to try to limit all potential distractors. Participants were seated 2 m in front of a laptop and Kinect.

2.4. Data Analysis

Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS for Windows, version 18.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA). Because of the small sample size, the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to compare scores in the above described measures before and after our virtual training. There was no missing data. The level of significance was set at .

3. Results

Table 2 provides a comprehensive overview of the results obtained from the analysis of the attentional tasks.

Mean (SD)Mean (SD)

Posner’s test (milliseconds)Cued target379.72 (90.88)435.78 (83.28)−2.0900.037
Mean time
Equal target355.78 (50.48)389.61 (69.66)−1.2740.203
Mean time
Unequal target370.48 (66.23)416.94 (74.82)−1.9880.047
Mean time

Attentional Blink TestAccuracy90.95 (15.94)87.62 (13.13)−1.7700.077

As is possible to see in Table 2, all attentional indexes, except one, have been significantly improved after the administration of the virtual training. There is a significant decrease in two of the three indexes in Posner’s tasks: “cued target” (; ) and “unequal target” (; ). These results suggest that there is an improvement only in the conditions in which a suggestion is provided. Also, there is a trend to significance in the accuracy of the Attentional Blink Test (, ).

Concerning the reading tasks, Table 3 offers a detailed synthesis of the results.

Mean (SD)Mean (SD)

Short nonwordErrors5.70 (4.11)5.30 (3.06)−.5260.599
Time (seconds)42.20 (9.31)39.40 (10.61)−1.2280.219
Long nonwordErrors8.00 (3.27)7.40 (2.32)−.3070.759
Time (seconds)70.50 (11.32)65.30 (15.49)−1.6120.107
High frequency short wordErrors1.20 (1.4)1.30 (1.42)−.3780.705
Time (seconds)27.40 (8.61)27.60 (9.09)−.3560.722
High frequency long wordErrors2.60 (1.84)2.40 (1.9)−.5200.603
Time (seconds)40.90 (15.99)38.40 (13.962)−1.2770.202
Low frequency short wordErrors3.40 (2.07)3.60 (2.07)−.2990.765
Time (seconds)37.80 (9.52)35.30 (10.54)−1.5550.120
Low frequency long wordErrors7.10 (3.7)5.70 (2.67)−1.4270.154
Time (seconds)63.40 (20.91)57.60 (17.87)−1.6840.092

As is possible to see in Table 3, most of the indexes from the reading tasks have not been significantly improved after the administration of our virtual training. Interestingly, an almost significant decrease was found in the time of reading low frequency long words (; ).

All the subjects finished the VR session tasks.

After four weeks of treatment, all the patients showed a significant improvement in the attentional domain, as shown in Table 1.

Specifically, patients improved significantly in the mean time for two conditions of Posner’s task: “cued target condition” and “unequal target condition.”

No significant difference emerged in analyzing the reading test before and after treatment.

The “low frequency long word” list showed a “tendency to significance” that indicated a slight improvement.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, the present study represents the first use of VR for rehabilitation of reading deficits in dyslexia, by potentiating attention abilities. According to our results, the use of cues in the context of a virtual environment may represent a promising approach to improve attentional skills. Attention is a crucial target in the rehabilitative treatment of these patients and may represent a first step toward a phonological awareness and an improvement of decoding skills. However, all the most cited theories about the origin of dyslexia converge about a functional deficit in the afferent pathways required for the verbal output.

The “rapid temporal processing theory” hypothesizes a deficit in auditory temporal processing that compromises the discrimination of language sounds. This deficit is stronger when there are very brief differences in the auditory inputs. Seven percent of preschool children may show a deficit in phonological awareness and/or morphosyntax and may have difficulty in identifying the order of rapidly presented tones. Students who exhibit these problems are those most likely to develop dyslexia [27, 28]. The “magnocellular hypothesis” is based on the observation that dyslexic people may have a problem in distinguishing the letters and their order. According to this theory, this problem is caused by an abnormality in visual magnocellular nerve cells. This pathway is important to control the visual guidance of attention and eye fixations. Dyslexic children may have problems with processing rapidly changing visual nonverbal information. The severity of this deficit is an indicator of the level of future reading deficits [2, 29].

While our results do not demonstrate an immediate effect on reading performance, suggesting that a more prolonged protocol may be a future direction, the presence of a significant decrease in the time of reading low frequency long words supports the possible validity of the proposed approach.

Indeed, according to Torgesen [30], rehabilitation training must focus on phonological awareness and decoding tasks; the program has to be intensive (almost an hour per day for 2 months) and must involve few students. Dyslexic and poor reader children may show phonological difficulties as early as kindergarten. Through an individual screening, based on the knowledge of letter names and sounds, phonological awareness, and speed of naming, it is possible to predict the future reading ability. Thus, it is important that an intensive phonological rehabilitation program be proposed for the high-risk students. This kind of exercise is challenging and could be helpful for many children but not for all.

Our protocol is innovative because it uses Virtual Reality to improve attentional skills in children with dyslexia. This technology is able to involve children in nonconventional tasks and allow them to work in a virtual environment similar to the real one.

Other studies are needed in order to clarify the effect of this protocol on the deficits associated with dyslexia, but the results of our pilot study and the achieved effect above 0.6 (effect size dz calculated with GPower software) are promising, even if the small sample size highlights the need of further studies.

Finally, we would like to stress the computational aspects of our study. First of all, the protocol and platform used are based on computational aspects of neuropsychological tests, since the platform was automatized and structured with automatic gesture recognition. On the other hand, the recording of the gestures and the participants’ behavior open the way to Cipresso’s paradigm of computational psychometrics to model behavior through the use of Virtual Reality [21]. Here, due to the small sample size and the different purpose, we did not consider the dynamics of the behavior, even if in the future this could represent a natural evolution of the protocol. Other computational aspects to be considered at the moment in a perspective view are to use sophisticated algorithms of machine learning for the best big behavioral data extraction and information toward an improved platform for helping the target population based on structured and solid data.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This study was partially supported by the research project “NeuroVirtual 3D” funded by Regione Piemonte (Grant no. FA 211-432C-2012). The authors would also like to thank Laura Bartesaghi, Federica Bellaviti, and Cosimo Tuena for their help in adapting the classroom environment of the NeuroVirtual 3D software.


  1. A. Feola, V. Marino, A. Masullo, A. M. Trabucco, and L. Marsella, “The protection of individuals affected with specific learning disorders in the Italian legislation,” La Clinica Terapeutica, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. e177–e181, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. D. E. Gabrieli, “Dyslexia: a new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5938, pp. 280–283, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. Asbury and R. Plomin, G Is for Genes: The Impact of Genetics on Education and Achievement, vol. 24, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  4. D. V. M. Bishop, “The interface between genetics and psychology: lessons from developmental dyslexia,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 282, no. 1806, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Elnakib, A. Soliman, M. Nitzken, M. F. Casanova, G. Gimel'farb, and A. El-Baz, “Magnetic resonance imaging findings for dyslexia: a review,” Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2778–2805, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. Hoeft, A. Meyler, A. Hernandez et al., “Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 4234–4239, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Wolf and P. G. Bowers, “The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 415–438, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Pino and L. Mortari, “The inclusion of students with dyslexia in higher education: a systematic review using narrative synthesis,” Dyslexia, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 346–369, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Dziorny, “Online course design elements to better meet the academic needs of students with dyslexia in higher education,” in Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, Va, USA, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. de Beer, J. Engels, Y. Heerkens, and J. van der Klink, “Factors influencing work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia: a systematic review,” BMC Public Health, vol. 14, no. 1, article 77, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. L. Peterson and B. F. Pennington, “Developmental dyslexia,” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9830, pp. 1997–2007, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Franceschini, S. Gori, M. Ruffino, S. Viola, M. Molteni, and A. Facoetti, “Action video games make dyslexic children read better,” Current Biology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 462–466, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Serino, E. Pedroli, A. Keizer et al., “Virtual reality body swapping: a tool for modifying the allocentric memory of the body,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 127–133, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. Cipresso, S. Serino, and G. Riva, “Psychometric assessment and behavioral experiments using a free virtual reality platform and computational science,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 16, no. 1, article no. 37, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Cipresso, S. Serino, E. Pedroli, A. Gaggioli, and G. Riva, “A virtual reality platform for assessment and rehabilitation of neglect using a kinect,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 196, pp. 66–68, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  16. P. Cipresso, S. Serino, I. A. C. Giglioli et al., “Low-cost motion-tracking for computational psychometrics based on virtual reality,” in Augmented and Virtual Reality, pp. 137–148, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  17. I. A. C. Giglioli, F. Pallavicini, E. Pedroli, S. Serino, and G. Riva, “Augmented reality: a brand new challenge for the assessment and treatment of psychological disorders,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 862942, 12 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. Cipresso, G. Albani, S. Serino et al., “Virtual multiple errands test (VMET): a virtual reality-based tool to detect early executive functions deficit in Parkinson's disease,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 8, article no. 405, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Pedroli, S. Serino, P. Cipresso, F. Pallavicini, and G. Riva, “Assessment and rehabilitation of neglect using virtual reality: a systematic review,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 9, article no. 226, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Pedroli, S. Serino, A. C. Giglioli, F. Pallavicini, P. Cipresso, and G. Riva, “The use of virtual reality tools for the assessment of executive functions and unilateral spatial neglect,” in Virtual Reality Enhanced Robotic Systems for Disability Rehabilitation, chapter 7, pp. 115–140, IGI Global, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Cipresso, “Modeling behavior dynamics using computational psychometrics within virtual worlds,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, article 1725, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Adams, P. Finn, E. Moes, K. Flannery, and A. Rizzo, “Distractibility in attention/deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): the virtual reality classroom,” Child Neuropsychology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 120–135, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. E. A. Attree, M. J. Turner, and N. Cowell, “A virtual reality test identifies the visuospatial strengths of adolescents with dyslexia,” Cyberpsychology & Behavior, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. L. Lacroix, I. Constantinescu, D. Cousineau, R. G. de Almeida, N. Segalowitz, and M. von Grünau, “Attentional blink differences between adolescent dyslexic and normal readers,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 115–119, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. I. Posner, C. R. Snyder, and B. J. Davidson, “Attention and the detection of signals,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 160–174, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Brooke, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” in Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  27. P. Tallal and M. Piercy, “Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia,” Nature, vol. 241, no. 5390, pp. 468–469, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. B. Tomblin, N. L. Records, P. Buckwalter, X. Zhang, E. Smith, and M. O'Brien, “Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1245–1260, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Stein, “Dyslexia: the role of vision and visual attention,” Current Developmental Disorders Reports, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 267–280, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. K. Torgesen, “Preventing early reading failure,” American Educator, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 6–9, 2004. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Elisa Pedroli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2954 Views | 1050 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.