Research Article
Assessment of Effective Network Connectivity among MEG None Contaminated Epileptic Transitory Events
Table 3
Nodes in common per patient and inverse problem methods.
| | Methods | Patient | Number of nodes in common | SOZ | % of MEG nodes confirmed by IEEG | % of IEEG nodes confirmed by MEEG | Average propagation delay in ms |
| | MNE | 1 | 2 | Yes | 74.6% | 79.8% | 22 | | 2 | 0 | No | 21 | | 3 | 2 | Yes | 20 | | 4 | 0 | Yes | 25 | | 5 | 1 | No | 22 |
| | eLORETA | 1 | 2 | Yes | 78% | 80.2% | 20 | | 2 | 1 | Yes | 19 | | 3 | 3 | Yes | 23 | | 4 | 2 | Yes | 18 | | 5 | 4 | Yes | 21 |
| | dSPM | 1 | 1 | No | 71.4% | 75.4% | 22 | | 2 | 2 | No | 25 | | 3 | 1 | Yes | 25 | | 4 | 2 | Yes | 23 | | 5 | 2 | Yes | 22 |
| | cMEM | 1 | 1 | Yes | 70% | 73.2% | 25 | | 2 | 1 | Yes | 23 | | 3 | 1 | Yes | 23 | | 4 | 1 | Yes | 19 | | 5 | 1 | Yes | 21 |
|
|
