| | Ref. no. | Screening target | Factors | Models | Tool challenges |
| | [14] | FPG 100–125 mg/dL, 120 mPG 100–125 mg/dL, or HbA1c 5.7–6.4% | 25 of socioeconomic, clinical, and biochemical factors | RF, GBM, LR, and ANN | Invasive measurement factors were required for screening | | [16] | FPG ≥100 mg/dL | Global diet quality score, age, smoking, alcohol drinking, unable to walk, use of rations card, time spent in sedentary activities | RF, GLMM, LASSO, and EN | Well-trained interviewers were needed to obtain dietary information | | [17] | HbA1c 5.7–6.4% | Age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure | RF, GBM, XGB, LR, and DL | Lack of individuals with high blood glucose levels from screening targets Some of factors could not be answered on the spot and may require the linkage of the laboratory data | | [18] | FPG 110–125 mg/dL or HbA1c 5.7–6.4% | Age, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, sleep duration, smoking status, and vigorous recreational activity time per week | XGB and LR | Lack of individuals with hyperglycemia after glucose loading from screening targets Some of factors could not be answered on the spot and may require the linkage of the laboratory data | | [19] | FPG ≥110 mg/dL or 120 mPG ≥140 mg/dL | Age, sex, BMI, smoking, FPG, fasting plasma triglyceride level, and history of high FPG | LR | Research participants were limited to staffs in an oil field in China invasive measurement factors were required for screening | | [20] | FPG 100–125 mg/dL, HbA1c 5.7–6.4%, or 120 mPG 140–199 mg/dL | Semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire answers and clinical and anthropometric measurements scores | LR | Well-trained interviewers were needed to obtain dietary information Invasive measurement factors were required for screening |
|
|