Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Complexity
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3597010, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3597010
Research Article

Sociotechnical Network Analysis for Power Grid Resilience in South Korea

1School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
2School of Urban and Civil Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel A. Eisenberg; ude.usa@bnesiead

Received 31 May 2017; Accepted 5 September 2017; Published 23 October 2017

Academic Editor: Paul Hines

Copyright © 2017 Daniel A. Eisenberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. L. Wilby and R. Keenan, “Adapting to flood risk under climate change,” Progress in Physical Geography, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 348–378, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP): Partnering for critical infrastructure security and resilience, 2013.
  3. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Hyogo Framework For Action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, 2007.
  4. The Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP, City Resilience Index, 2015, The Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP, “City Resilience Index,” p. 16, 2015.
  5. Committee on Determinants of Market Adoption of Advanced Energy Efficiency and Clean Energy Technologies, The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies, The National Academies Press, 2016.
  6. Committee on Analytical Research Foundations for the Next-Generation Electric Grid, Analytic Research Foundations for the Next-Generation Electric Grid, The National Academies Press, 2016.
  7. Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force, The Department of Energy (DOE), Quadrennial Review: Transforming the Nation’s Electricity System: The Second Installment of the Quadrennial Energy Review, 2017.
  8. North American Electric Reliability Corporation, September 2011 Southwest Blackout Event, 2011.
  9. O. P. Veloza and F. Santamaria, “Analysis of major blackouts from 2003 to 2015: Classification of incidents and review of main causes,” The Electricity Journal, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 42–49, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C.-C. Sun, C.-C. Liu, and J. Xie, “Cyber-physical system security of a power grid: State-of-the-art,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 5, no. 3, article no. 40, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), Preliminary Report 3rd Oct – Black System Event in South Australia on 28 September 2016, Report no. September, 2016.
  12. M. M. Adibi and L. H. Fink, “Restoration from cascading failures,” IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 68–77, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Panteli and P. Mancarella, “The grid: Stronger, bigger, smarter?: Presenting a conceptual framework of power system resilience,” IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 58–66, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Panteli and P. Mancarella, “Influence of extreme weather and climate change on the resilience of power systems: Impacts and possible mitigation strategies,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 127, pp. 259–270, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Panteli and P. Mancarella, “Modeling and evaluating the resilience of critical electrical power infrastructure to extreme weather events,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. PP, no. 99, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Pourbeik, P. S. Kundur, and C. W. Taylor, “The anatomy of a power grid blackout,” IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 22–29, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Andersson, P. Donalek, R. Farmer et al., “Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1922–1928, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Kirschen and F. Bouffard, “Keep the Lights On and the Information Flowing,” IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Walker, “Come back sociotechnical systems theory, all is forgiven …,” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 32, pp. 170–179, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Korea Power Exchange (KPX), Korea Power Exchange Transmission Map, 2016, https://www.kpx.or.kr/eng/contents.do?key=333.
  21. M. E. J. Newman, Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. F. Hu, A. Mostashari, and J. Xie, Eds., Socio-Technical Networks: Science and Engineering Design, CRC Press, 2011.
  23. A. Vespignani, “Modelling dynamical process in complex socio-technical systems,” Nature Physics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. M. Salmon, N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, D. Jenkins, C. Baber, and R. McMaster, “Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: A case study in the energy distribution domain,” Ergonomics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 367–384, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. A. Stanton, “Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: How a submarine returns to periscope depth,” Ergonomics, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 403–418, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. A. Stanton and C. Harvey, “Beyond human error taxonomies in assessment of risk in sociotechnical systems: a new paradigm with the EAST ‘broken-links’ approach,” Ergonomics, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 221–233, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. A. Eisenberg, J. Park, D. Kim, and T. P. Seager, “Resilience analysis of critical infrastructure systems requires integration of multiple analytical techniques,” Urban Sustainability and Resilience, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. Amir and V. Kant, “Sociotechnical Resilience: A Preliminary Concept,” Risk Analysis, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. P. H. J. Nardelli, N. Rubido, C. Wang et al., “Models for the modern power grid,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 223, no. 12, pp. 2423–2437, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. M. Carley, “Computational organizational science and organizational engineering,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 10, no. 5-7, pp. 253–269, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Jung and M. Song, “Linking emergency management networks to disaster resilience: Bonding and bridging strategy in hierarchical or horizontal collaboration networks,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1465–1483, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. Kapucu and V. Garayev, “Designing, Managing, and Sustaining Functionally Collaborative Emergency Management Networks,” The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 312–330, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. Kapucu and V. Garayev, “Structure and Network Performance: Horizontal and Vertical Networks in Emergency Management,” Administration and Society, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 931–961, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Kim, Blackouts Hit Korea Nationwide, The Korea Times, 2011.
  35. C. Sang-Hu, Scandal in South Korea over nuclear revelations, New York Times, 2013.
  36. T.-E. Kim, S. Nazir, and K. I. Øvergård, “A STAMP-based causal analysis of the Korean Sewol ferry accident,” Safety Science, vol. 83, pp. 93–101, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Kim and H. Kim, “Improving Korea's societal security by preparing for unforeseen disasters: Focused on the horizontal collaboration approach,” International Journal of Security and Its Applications, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 11–20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. H. Kim, D. A. Eisenberg, Y. H. Chun, and J. Park, “Network topology and resilience analysis of South Korean power grid,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 465, pp. 13–24, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Korea Power Exchange (KPX), Electric Power Statistics Information System, 2016, http://epsis.kpx.or.kr/epsis/ekesStaticMain.do;jsessionid=Y0JXXWdKvpwzznLpXTn5fy0Z4sLvbZzlQytHgtwF2kN2phJJQjsR!241999982?cmd=001001&flag=&locale=EN.
  40. D. Ngar-yin Mah, J. M. van der Vleuten, J. Chi-man Ip, and P. Ronald Hills, “Governing the transition of socio-technical systems: A case study of the development of smart grids in Korea,” Energy Policy, vol. 45, pp. 133–141, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, and R. J. Thomas, “MATPOWER: steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Matlab Tools for Network Analysis (2006-2011), 2011, http://strategic.mit.edu/downloads.php?page=matlab_networks.
  43. D. Gleich, MatlabBGL, 2008, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/10922-matlabbgl?requestedDomain=www.mathworks.com.
  44. S. P. Borgatti, “Centrality and network flow,” Social Networks, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 55–71, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Rosas-Casals, S. Bologna, E. F. Bompard et al., “Knowing power grids and understanding complexity science,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4–14, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. N. Kapucu, “Interorganizational Coordination in Dynamic Context: Networks in Emergency Response Management,” Connections, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 33–48, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  47. A. B. M. Nasiruzzaman, H. R. Pota, and M. A. Mahmud, “Application of centrality measures of complex network framework in power grid,” in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2011, pp. 4660–4665, aus, November 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. B. M. Nasiruzzaman, H. R. Pota, and A. Anwar, “Comparative study of power grid centrality measures using complex network framework,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2012, pp. 176–181, mys, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. B. M. Nasiruzzaman, H. R. Pota, A. Anwar, and F. R. Islam, “Modified centrality measure based on bidirectional power flow for smart and bulk power transmission grid,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2012, pp. 159–164, mys, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. B. M. Nasiruzzaman and H. R. Pota, “Transient stability assessment of smart power system using complex networks framework,” in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future, usa, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. B. Nasiruzzaman and H. R. Pota, “Complex network framework based comparative study of power grid centrality measures,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 3, no. 4, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  52. S. Arianos, E. Bompard, A. Carbone, and F. Xue, “Power grid vulnerability: A complex network approach,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 19, no. 1, Article ID 013119, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. E. Bompard, R. Napoli, and F. Xue, “Extended topological approach for the assessment of structural vulnerability in transmission networks,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 716–724, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. E. Bompard, D. Wu, and F. Xue, “Structural vulnerability of power systems: A topological approach,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 1334–1340, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. C. Ejebe, J. Tong, J. G. Waight, J. G. Frame, X. Wang, and W. F. Tinney, “Available transfer capability calculations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1521–1527, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. J. Wood, B. F. Wollenberg, and G. B. Sheble, Power Generation, Operation, and Control, John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
  57. E. Bompard, L. Luo, and E. Pons, “A perspective overview of topological approaches for vulnerability analysis of power transmission grids,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. E. Bompard, E. Pons, and D. Wu, “Extended topological metrics for the analysis of power grid vulnerability,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 481–487, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. M. Carley, J. Pfeffer, J. Reminga, J. Storrick, and D. Columbus, “ORA User's Guide 2013,” Defense Technical Information Center, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. A. Abbasi and N. Kapucu, “A longitudinal study of evolving networks in response to natural disaster,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–70, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. L. C. Freeman, “Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification,” Social Networks, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215–239, 1978-1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. B. Petrenj, E. Lettieri, and P. Trucco, “Towards enhanced collaboration and information sharing for critical infrastructure resilience: Current barriers and emerging capabilities,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 8, no. 2-3, pp. 107–120, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. E. P. R. Coelho, J. C. Thomazelli, M. H. M. Paiva, and M. E. V. Segatto, “A complex network analysis of the Brazilian Power Test System,” in Proceedings of the IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America, ISGT LATAM 2015, pp. 113–118, ury, October 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. Z. Wang, A. Scaglione, and R. J. Thomas, “Electrical centrality measures for electric power grid vulnerability analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2010 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2010, pp. 5792–5797, usa, December 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. H. Bai and S. Miao, “Hybrid flow betweenness approach for identification of vulnerable line in power system,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1324–1331, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus