Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Complexity
Volume 2017, Article ID 7053710, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7053710
Research Article

Shrimp Feed Formulation via Evolutionary Algorithm with Power Heuristics for Handling Constraints

1Department of Decision Science, School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
2University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih, Malaysia
3University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
4Mariculture Research Centre, Bukit Malut, 07000 Langkawi, Malaysia
5School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

Correspondence should be addressed to Rosshairy Abd. Rahman; ym.ude.muu@yriahs

Received 30 May 2017; Revised 26 August 2017; Accepted 2 November 2017; Published 26 November 2017

Academic Editor: Michele Scarpiniti

Copyright © 2017 Rosshairy Abd. Rahman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. FAO, “Fisheries and Aquaculture Department,” 2014, http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2727e/i2727e.pdf.Last.
  2. K. Chin, “The feedmilling industry, the assessment of product quality and the economics of shrimp feeds. Report of the workshop on shrimp and finfish feed development. Johore Bahru,” Malaysia, pp. 25–29, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Lim and D. M. Akiyama, “Chapter 6: Nutrient requirement of penaeid shrimp,” in Nutrition and utilization technology in aquaculture, pp. 60–73, AOCS Press, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. C. Shang, P. Leung, and B.-H. Ling, “Comparative economics of shrimp farming in Asia,” Aquaculture, vol. 164, no. 1-4, pp. 183–200, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. W. Hertrampf, P. K. Biswal, and S. K. Mishra, “A revolutionary concept for shrimp feeding,” http://www.allaboutfeed.net/Process-Management/Management/2005/6/A-revolutionary-concept-for-shrimp-feeding-AAF010209W/.
  6. J. M. Fox, G. D. Treece, and D. R. Sanchez, “Shrimp nutrition and feed management,” in Methods for improving shrimp farming in Central America, M. C. Haws and C. E. Boyd, Eds., pp. 65–90, of Central America Press, Managua, Nicaragua:University, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Fox, A. L. Lawrence, and E. Li-Chan, “Dietary requirement for lysine by juvenile penaeusvannamei using intact and free amino acid sources,” Aquaculture, vol. 131, pp. 279–290, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. G. J. Tacon, J. J. Cody, L. D. Conquest, S. Divakaran, I. P. Forster, and O. E. Decamp, “Effect of culture system on the nutrition and growth performance of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) fed different diets,” Aquaculture Nutrition, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 121–137, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Pascual, E. Zenteno, G. Cuzon et al., “Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles energetic balance and immunological response to dietary proteins,” Aquaculture, vol. 239, no. 1-4, pp. 375–395, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Arnold, R. Smullen, M. Briggs, M. West, and B. Glencross, “The combined effect of feed frequency and ration size of diets with and without microbial biomass on the growth and feed conversion of juvenile Penaeus monodon,” Aquaculture Nutrition, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1340–1347, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. L. Zeng, W. Q. Long, L. X. Tian et al., “Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 on growth performance, body composition, haematological parameters and histopathology of juvenile Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei),” Aquaculture Nutrition, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1152–1159, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y.-Y. Yu, W.-D. Chen, Y.-J. Liu, J. Niu, M. Chen, and L.-X. Tian, “Effect of different dietary levels of Gracilaria lemaneiformis dry power on growth performance, hematological parameters and intestinal structure of juvenile Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei),” Aquaculture, vol. 450, pp. 356–362, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Venero, D. A. Davis, and D. B. Rouse, “Variable feed allowance with constant protein input for the pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared under semi-intensive conditions in tanks and ponds,” Aquaculture, vol. 269, no. 1-4, pp. 490–503, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Jobling, “National Research Council (NRC): Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp,” Aquaculture International, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 601-602, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. P. Lazo and D. A. Davis, “Ingredient and feed evaluation,” in Encyclopedia of Aquaculture, R. R. Stickney, Ed., pp. 453–463, Wiley-terscience Publication, Texas, Tx, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. M. Fox, D. A. Davis, M. Wilson, and A. L. Lawrence, “Current status of amino acid requirement research with marine penaeid shrimp,” in Avances en Nutrición Acuícola VIII. VIII Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola, pp. 182–196, Nuevo León, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  17. G. M. Pesti, “Impact of dietary amino acid and crude protein levels in broiler feeds on biological performance,” Journal of Applied Poultry Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 477–486, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. R. Rahman, Evolutionary algorithms with average crossover and power heuristics for aquaculture diet formulation [Ph.D. thesis], Universiti Utara Malaysia, 2014.
  19. L. E. Cruz-Suárez, M. Nieto-López, C. Guajardo-Barbosa, M. Tapia-Salazar, U. Scholz, and D. Ricque-Marie, “Replacement of fish meal with poultry by-product meal in practical diets for Litopenaeus vannamei, and digestibility of the tested ingredients and diets,” Aquaculture, vol. 272, no. 1-4, pp. 466–476, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Furuya, T. Satake, and Y. Minami, “Evolutionary programming for mix design,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 18, no. 2-3, pp. 129–135, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. A. Şahman, M. Çunkaş, Ş. İnal, F. İnal, B. Coşkun, and U. Taşkiran, “Cost optimization of feed mixes by genetic algorithms,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 965–974, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. K. Deep and M. Thakur, “A new mutation operator for real coded genetic algorithms,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 211–230, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. E. Eckstein, “Communication to the Editor—Is the “Diet Problem” Identical to the “Menu Planning Problem”?” Management Science, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 527-528, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. L. Balintfy, G. T. Ross, P. Sinha, and A. A. Zoltners, “A mathematical programming system for preference and compatibility maximized menu planning and scheduling,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Render, J. Stair, M. E. Hanna, and R. M. Hanna, Quantitative analysis for management (, , ). Upper Saddle River, Pearson Education, Inc, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 9th edition, 2006.
  26. M. O. Afolayan and M. Afolayan, “Nigeria oriented poultry feed formulation software requirements,” Journal of Applied Sciences Research, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1596–1602, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  27. M. J. Villamide, R. Carobaño, I. Hernández et al., “Evolution of a feed formulation practice in amandatory course on animal production,” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 1797–1801, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. K. D. K. Piyaratne, N. G. J. Dias, and N. S. B. M. Attapattu, “Linear model based software approach with ideal amino acid profiles for least-cost poultry ration formulation,” Information Technology Journal, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 788–793, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Thammaniwit and P. Charnsethikul, “Benders decomposition method for a large two-stage linear programming model,” International Transaction Journal of Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 253–268, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. A. Altun and M. A. Şahman, “Cost optimization of mixed feeds with the particle swarm optimization method,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 383–390, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. R. Rahman and R. Ramli, “Average Concept of Crossover Operator,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Management and Artificial Intelligent, 2013.
  32. W. B. Roush, T. Cravener, and F. Zhang, “Computer formulation observations and caveats,” Journal of Applied Poultry Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. R. Gillespie and F. B. Flanders, Modern livestock and poultry production, Cengage Learning, Clifton Park, New York, USA, 8th edition, 2009.
  34. S. Ghosh, J. Ghosh, D. T. Pal, and R. Gupta, “Current concepts of feed formulation for livestock using mathematical modeling,” Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 205–223, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Zhang, J. Lu, and Y. Gao, Multi-level decision making models, methods and applications, Springer, methods and applications, 2015.
  36. E. K. Burke and G. Kendall, “Introduction,” in Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques, E. K. Burke and G. Kendall, Eds., p. 18, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  37. F. V. Waugh, “The minimum-cost dairy feed,” Journal of Farm Economics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 299–310, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. L. W. Swanson and J. G. Woodruff, “A sequential approach to the feed-mix problem a sequential approach to the feed-mix problem,” Operations Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 89–109, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  39. H. Nott and J. F. Combs, “Data processing feed ingredient composition data,” Feed Stuffs, vol. 39, no. 41, pp. 21-22, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  40. S. A. Rahman and F. E. Bender, “Linear programming approximation of least-cost feed mixes with probability restrictions,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 612–618, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. M. Mohr, “The bulk constraint and computer formulations of least-cost feed mixes,” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  42. A. E. Chappell, “Linear programming cuts costs in production of animal feeds,” Operational Research Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. A. Barbieri and G. Cuzon, “Improved nutrient specification for linear programming of penaeid rations,” Aquaculture, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 313–323, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. J. Glen, “A Mathematical Programming Approach to Beef Feedlot Optimization,” Management Science, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 524–535, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. C. Zioganas, The determination of viable, parity and optimum sizes of family-type sheep farms in the Epirus Region of Greece. Unpublished doctoral thesis [Ph.d. thesis], 1981.
  46. N. R. S. Pierre and W. R. Harvey, “Incorporation of uncertainty in composition of feeds into least-cost ration models,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 69, pp. 3051–3062, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. H. C. De Kock and M. Sinclair, “Multi-mix feedstock problems on microcomputers,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 585–590, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. G. Munford, “A microcomputer system for formulating animal diets which may involve liquid raw materials,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 270–276, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. G. Munford, “Evaluating marginal costs associated with ratio and other constraints in linear programmes,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 933–935, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. D. O'Connor, C. J. Sniffen, D. G. Fox, and R. A. Miligan, “Least cost dairy cattle ration formulation model based on the degradable protein system,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 72, pp. 2733–2745, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  51. D. M. Forsyth, “Chapter 5: Computer programming of beef cattle diet. In,” in Beef cattle feeding and nutrition, T. W. Perry and M. J. Cecava, Eds., p. 68, Academic Press, Inc, California, Ca, USA, 2nd edition, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  52. A. G. Munford, “The use of iterative linear programming in practical applications of animal diet formulation,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 42, no. 2-3, pp. 255–261, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. E. Thomson and J. Nolan, “UNEform: A powerful feed formulation spreadsheet suitable for teaching or on-farm formulation,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 91, no. 3-4, pp. 233–240, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. S. Htun, T. T. Thein, and P. Tin, Linear programming approach to diet problem for black tiger shrimp in shrimp aquaculture. Paper presented at the Information and Telecommunication Technologies, Yangon, Myanmar, Burma, 2005.
  55. T. O. S. Olorunfemi, “Linear programming approach to least-cost ration formulation for poults,” Information Technology Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 294–299, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. Chakeredza, F. K. Akinnifesi, O. C. Ajayi, G. Sileshi, S. Mngomba, and F. M. T. Gondwe, “A simple method of formulating least-cost diets for smallholder dairy production in sub-Saharan Africa,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 16, pp. 2925–2933, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. Engelbrecht, Optimising animal diets at the Johannesburg zoo [Bachelor degree thesis], University of Pretoria, 2008.
  58. B. Al-Deseit, “Least-cost broiler ration formulation using linear programming technique,” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1274–1278, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. Oishi, H. Kumagai, and H. Hirooka, “Application of the modified feed formulation to optimize economic and environmental criteria in beef cattle fattening systems with food by-products,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 165, no. 1-2, pp. 38–50, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. I. U. Udo, C. B. Ndome, S. B. Ekanem, and P. E. Asuquo, “Application of linear programming technique in least-cost ration formulation for African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in semi-intensive culture system in Nigeria,” Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 429–437, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. T. T. H. Nguyen, I. Bouvarel, P. Ponchant, and H. M. G. Van Der Werf, “Using environmental constraints to formulate low-impact poultry feeds,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 28, pp. 215–224, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. L. E. Moraes, J. E. Wilen, P. H. Robinson, and J. G. Fadel, “A linear programming model to optimize diets in environmental policy scenarios,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 1267–1282, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. Rehman and C. Romero, “Multiple-criteria decision-making techniques and their role in livestock ration formulation,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 23–49, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. T. Rehman and C. Romero, “Goal programming with penalty functions and livestock ration formulation,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 117–132, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. P. Lara, “An interactive multigoal programming model for determining livestock rations: An application to dairy cows in Andalusia, spain,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 945–953, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. P. Lara, “Multiple objective fractional programming and livestock ration formulation: a case study for dairy cow diets in Spain,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 321–334, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. P. Lara and C. Romero, “Relaxation of nutrient requirements on livestock rations through interactive multigoal programming,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 443–453, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. K. Mitani and H. Nakayama, “A multiobjective diet planning support system using the satisficing trade-off method,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 6, pp. 131–139, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  69. P. J. dit Bailleul, J. Rivest, F. Dubeau, and C. Pomar, “Reducing nitrogen excretion in pigs by modifying the traditional least-cost formulation algorithm,” Livestock Production Science, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 199–211, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. P. R. Tozer and J. R. Stokes, “A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 201–215, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. F. Zhang and W. B. Roush, “Multiple-objective (goal) programming model for feed formulation: an example for reducing nutrient variation,” Poultry Science, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 182–192, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. Romero and T. Rehman, “Livestock ration formulation via goal programming with penalty functions,” in In Romero, vol. 11, pp. 149–161, In, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  73. C. Castrodeza, P. Lara, and T. Peña, “Multicriteria fractional model for feed formulation: Economic, nutritional and environmental criteria,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 76–96, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. C. Pomar, F. Dubeau, M.-P. Létourneau-Montminy, C. Boucher, and P.-O. Julien, “Reducing phosphorus concentration in pig diets by adding an environmental objective to the traditional feed formulation algorithm,” Livestock Science, vol. 111, no. 1-2, pp. 16–27, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. T. Peña, P. Lara, and C. Castrodeza, “Multiobjective stochastic programming for feed formulation,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1738–1748, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. Z. Babić and T. Perić, “Optimization of livestock feed blend by use of goal programming,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 218–223, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. W. Popp and C. V. D. van de Panne, “Minimum-cost cattle feed under probabilistic protein constraints,” Management Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 405–430, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  78. G. M. Pesti and B. R. Miller, Animal feed formulation: Economics and computer applications, Chapman Hall, New York, 1993.
  79. G. M. Pesti and A. F. Seila, “The Use of an Electronic Spreadsheet to Solve Linear and Non-Linear "Stochastic" Feed Formulation Problems,” Journal of Applied Poultry Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 110–121, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. P. R. Tozer, “Least-cost ration formulations for holstein dairy heifers by using linear and stochastic programming,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 443–451, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. V. M. Katarkevich, A. N. Rubinov, S. A. Ryzhechkin, and T. Sh. Efendiev, “Compact holographic solid-state distributed-feedback laser,” Quantum Electronics A, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 871–873, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. W. B. Roush and T. L. Cravener, “Stochastic true digestible amino acid values,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 102, no. 1–4, pp. 225–239, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. I. U. Udo, C. B. Ndome, and P. E. Asuquo, “Use of stochastic programming in least-cost feed formulation for african catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in semi-intensive culture system in Nigeria,” Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 447–455, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. J. T. Chen, “Quadratic programming for least-cost feed formulations under probabilistic protein constraints,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 175–183, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. V. R. Guevara, “Use of nonlinear programming to optimize performance response to energy density in broiler feed formulation,” Poultry Science, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. P. Saxena and M. Chandra, “Animal diet formulation models: A review (1950-2010),” CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, vol. 6, article no. 57, pp. 1–9, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. P. Saxena, Animal diet formulation using nonlinear programming: an innovative approach, Germany:Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011.
  88. J. M. C. Hutchinson and G. Gigerenzer, “Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet,” Behavioural Processes, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 97–124, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. F. Oliveira and M. A. Carravilla, “Heuristics and Local Search,” Technical Report, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  90. K. Ruohonen and J. Kettunen, “Effective experimental designs for optimizing fish feeds,” Aquaculture Nutrition, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 145–151, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. I. P. Forster, W. G. Dominy, A. L. Lawrence, F. L. Castille, and S. Patnaik, “Optimization of a research diet for the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, using mixture model methodology,” Aquaculture, vol. 298, no. 3-4, pp. 260–266, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. S. Pathumnakul, M. Ittiphalin, K. Piewthongngam, and S. Rujikietkumjorn, “Should feed mills go beyond traditional least cost formulation?” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 243–249, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. K. Sörensen and F. Glover, Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, K. Sörensen, F. Glover, and F. Metaheuristics, Eds., New York, 2013.
  94. J. J. Glen, “A linear programming model for an integrated crop and intensive beef production enterprise,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 487–494, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. F. Polimeno, T. Rehman, H. Neal, and C. M. Yates, “Integrating the use of linear and dynamic programming methods for dairy cow diet formulation,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 931–942, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. J. M. Cadenas, D. A. Pelta, H. R. Pelta, and J. L. Verdegay, “Application of fuzzy optimization to diet problems in Argentinean farms,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 218–228, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. D. L. J. Alexander, P. C. H. Morel, and G. R. Wood, “Feeding strategies for maximising gross margin in pig production,” in Global Optimization: Scientific And Engineering Case Studies, pp. 33–43, Springer, New York, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  98. J. Žgajnar, L. Juvancic, S. Kavcic, J. Žgajnar, L. Juvančič, and S. Kavčič, “Spreadsheet tool for least-cost and nutrition balanced beef ration formulation,” in Proceedings of the Paper presented at the 16th Int. Symp. Animal Science Days, Strunjan, Slovenia, 2008.
  99. J. Žgajnar, L. Juvančič, and S. Kavčič, “Combination of linear and weighted goal programming with penalty function in optimisation of a daily dairy cow ration,” Agricultural Economics, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 492–500, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. Žgajnar, L. Juvancic, S. Kavcic, J. Žgajnar, L. Juvančič, and S. Kavčič, “Multi-goal pig ration formulation; mathematical optimization approach,” Agronomy Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 775–782, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  101. D. Sirisatien, G. R. Wood, M. Dong, and P. C. H. Morel, “Two aspects of optimal diet determination for pig production: efficiency of solution and incorporation of cost variation,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 249–261, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  102. S. Thammaniwit and P. Charnsethikul, “Benders decomposition method for a large two-stage linear programming model,” International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management and Applied Sciences and Technologies, vol. 4, pp. 253–268.
  103. F.-C. Li and C.-X. Jin, “Study on fuzzy optimization methods based on principal operation and inequity degree,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1545–1555, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. C. A. Poojari and B. Varghese, “Genetic algorithm based technique for solving chance constrained problems,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 1128–1154, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  105. S. Rahnamayan, H. R. Tizhoosh, and M. M. A. Salama, “A novel population initialization method for accelerating evolutionary algorithms,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1605–1614, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  106. R. Kumar and Jyotishree, “Blending Roulette Wheel Selection Rank Selection in Genetic Algorithms,” International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, vol. 2, pp. 365–370.
  107. A. Shrestha and A. Mahmood, “Improving Genetic Algorithm with Fine-tuned Crossover and Scaled Architecture,” Journal of Mathematics, v.2016, Article ID, vol. 10, Article ID 4015845, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/pages. View at Google Scholar
  108. D. A. Davis, “Nutrient requirements of penaeid shrimp,” Global Aquaculture Advocate, pp. 72–74, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  109. K. Sastry, D. Goldberg, and G. Kendall, “Chapter 4: Genetic Algorithms,” in Introductory tutorials in optimization and decision support techniques, E. K. Burke and G. Kendall, Eds., pp. 93–117, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  110. D. E. Goldberg, “Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning,” Choice Reviews Online, vol. 27, no. 02, pp. 27-0936–27-0936, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. C. Seenivasan, S. Radhakrishnan, T. Muralisankar, and P. Saravana Bhavan, “Bacillus subtilis on survival, growth, biochemical constituents and energy utilization of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii post larvae,” Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 195–203, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. S. Lin, X. Lin, Y. Yang, F. Li, and L. Luo, “Comparison of chelated zinc and zinc sulfate as zinc sources for growth and immune response of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei),” Aquaculture, vol. 406-407, pp. 79–84, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. T. Muralisankar, P. S. Bhavan, S. Radhakrishnan, C. Seenivasan, N. Manickam, and R. Shanthi, “Effects of dietary supplementation of fish and vegetable oils on the growth performance and muscle compositions of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii,” The Journal of Basic & Applied Zoology, vol. 67, pp. 34–39, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  114. A. J. P. Nunes, M. V. C. Sá, C. L. Browdy, and M. Vazquez-Anon, “Practical supplementation of shrimp and fish feeds with crystalline amino acids,” Aquaculture, vol. 431, pp. 20–27, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. B. T. N. Kumar, H. S. Murthy, P. Patil, P. L. Doddamani, and R. Patil, “Enhanced immune response and resistance to white tail disease in chitin-diet fed freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii,” Aquaculture Reports, vol. 2, pp. 34–38, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. C. Hernández, M. A. Olvera-Novoa, K. Aguilar-Vejar, B. González-Rodríguez, and I. Abdo de la Parra, “Partial replacement of fish meal by porcine meat meal in practical diets for Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei),” Aquaculture, vol. 277, no. 3-4, pp. 244–250, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. D. M. Smith, G. L. Allan, K. C. Williams, and C. Barlow, Avances en Nutrición Acuícola V. Memorias del V Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola, Cruz-Sußrez., L. E. Ricque-Marie, D. Tapia-Salazar, M. Olvera-Novoa, and M. A. y Civera-Cerecedo, Eds., Mérida, Yucatán, México, 2000.
  118. L. Burri and J. P. Nunes, “Benefits of including krill meal into shrimp diets,” World Aquaculture, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  119. A. V. Suresh, K. P. Kumaraguru vasagam, and S. Nates, “Attractability and palatability of protein ingredients of aquatic and terrestrial animal origin, and their practical value for blue shrimp, Litopenaeus stylirostris fed diets formulated with high levels of poultry byproduct meal,” Aquaculture, vol. 319, no. 1-2, pp. 132–140, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. T. M. Samocha, D. A. Davis, I. P. Saoud, and K. DeBault, “Substitution of fish meal by co-extruded soybean poultry by-product meal in practical diets for the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei,” Aquaculture, vol. 231, no. 1-4, pp. 197–203, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus