Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Complexity
Volume 2018, Article ID 1918753, 19 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1918753
Research Article

A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity

1Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
2Universitat de Barcelona Institute of Complex Systems (UBICS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Gemma Rosell-Tarragó; moc.liamg@ogarratllesorammeg

Received 24 January 2018; Revised 20 April 2018; Accepted 3 May 2018; Published 12 July 2018

Academic Editor: Hiroki Sayama

Copyright © 2018 Gemma Rosell-Tarragó et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. M. Tucker-Drob, “Differentiation of cognitive abilities across the life span,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1097–1118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Kanfer, “Motivation and individual differences in learning: an integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectives,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 221–239, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. H. Jonassen and B. L. Grabowski, Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction, L. Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
  4. R. J. Sternberg and L.-F. Zhang, Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.
  5. U. Neisser, G. Boodoo, T. J. Bouchard Jr. et al., “Intelligence: knowns and unknowns,” American Psychologist, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. E. E. Smith and S. M. Kosslyn, Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, 2009.
  7. H. J. Eysenck, “The concept of “intelligence”: useful or useless?” Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. J. Herrnstein and C. A. Murray, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, Simon & Schuster, 1996.
  9. H. Rindermann, “The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: the homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations,” European Journal of Personality, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 667–706, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Stein and K. Heikkinen, “Models, metrics, and measurement in developmental psychology,” Integral Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–24, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. G. S. Lesser, G. Fifer, and D. H. Clark, “Mental abilities of children from different social-class and cultural groups,” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–115, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Gardner, Frames of Mind, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
  13. L. Erlenmeyer-Kimling and L. F. Jarvik, “Genetics and intelligence: a review,” Science, vol. 142, no. 3598, pp. 1477–1479, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. I. J. Deary, L. Penke, and W. Johnson, “The neuroscience of human intelligence differences,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 201–211, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. R. Gray and P. M. Thompson, “Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 471–482, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. G. Mattar and D. S. Bassett, “Brain network architecture: implications for human learning,” 2016, https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01790.
  17. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  18. J. B. Carroll, Human Cognitive Abilities. A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. P. L. Ackerman, “Individual differences in skill learning: an integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 3–27, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. B. Kaufman, M. R. Reynolds, X. Liu, A. S. Kaufman, and K. S. McGrew, “Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests,” Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. L. Castejon, A. M. Perez, and R. Gilar, “Confirmatory factor analysis of Project Spectrum activities. A second-order g factor or multiple intelligences?” Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 481–496, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Molenaar, C. V. Dolan, J. M. Wicherts, and H. L. J. van der Maas, “Modeling differentiation of cognitive abilities within the higher-order factor model using moderated factor analysis,” Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 611–624, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Johnson, J. t. Nijenhuis, and T. J. Bouchard Jr., “Still just 1 g: consistent results from five test batteries,” Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 81–95, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. L. Ackerman, M. E. Beier, and M. O. Boyle, “Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs?” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 30–60, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Wechsler, The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, Williams & Wilkins Co, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. L. M. Terman and M. A. Merrill, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual for the Third Revision, Form L-M, Houghton Mifflin, Oxford, UK, 1960.
  27. C. Spearman, ““General intelligence”: objectively determined and measured,” The American Journal of Psychology, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 201, 1904. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. R. B. Cattell, “Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: a critical experiment,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. L. Horn and R. B. Cattell, “Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 253–270, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. V. D. Schmittmann, A. O. J. Cramer, L. J. Waldorp, S. Epskamp, R. A. Kievit, and D. Borsboom, “Deconstructing the construct: a network perspective on psychological phenomena,” New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. V. Dolan, F. J. Oort, R. D. Stoel, and J. M. Wicherts, “Testing measurement invariance in the target rotated multigroup exploratory factor model,” Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 295–314, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Massidda, M. Giovanni Carta, and G. Altoè, “Integrating different factorial solutions of a psychometric tool via social network analysis,” Methodology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 97–106, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Juarrero, “Complex Dynamical Systems Theory,” Tech. Rep., Cognitive Edge, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  34. P. Van Geert, “A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth,” Psychological Review, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 3–53, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. van Geert and H. Steenbeek, “The dynamics of scaffolding,” New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 115–128, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. L. J. Van Der Maas, C. V. Dolan, R. P. P. P. Grasman, J. M. Wicherts, H. M. Huizenga, and M. E. J. Raijmakers, “A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism,” Psychological Review, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 842–861, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. H. W. Steenbeek and P. L. C. van Geert, “A theory and dynamic model of dyadic interaction: concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmental context,” Developmental Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. van Vondel, H. Steenbeek, M. van Dijk, and P. van Geert, “Ask, don’t tell; a complex dynamic systems approach to improving science education by focusing on the co-construction of scientific understanding,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 63, pp. 243–253, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. H. Geveke, H. W. Steenbeek, J. M. Doornenbal, and P. L. C. van Geert, “Attractor states in teaching and learning processes: a study of out-of-school science education,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 299 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. R. Vallacher and A. Nowak, Eds., Dynamical Systems in Social Psychology, Academic Press, 1994.
  41. E. M. A. Blijd-Hoogewys and P. L. C. van Geert, “Non-linearities in theory-of-mind development,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, p. 1970, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. R. Vallacher, P. van Geert, and A. Nowak, “The intrinsic dynamics of psychological process,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 58–64, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. J. R. Den Hartigh, M. W. G. van Dijk, H. W. Steenbeek, and P. L. C. van Geert, “A dynamic network model to explain the development of excellent human performance,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, p. 532, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Newman, Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. P. Erdös and A. Rényi, “On random graphs,” Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, vol. 6, pp. 290–297, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  46. A.-L. Barabasi, “Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5939, pp. 412-413, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Caldarelli, Scale-Free Networks. Complex Webs in Nature and Technology. Reprint of the 2007 Hardback, Oxford University Press, 2013.
  48. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, “Statistical mechanics of complex networks,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 47–97, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A. L. Barabási, “Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5586, pp. 1551–1555, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman, “Community structure in social and biological networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 7821–7826, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. Danon, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Duch, and A. Arenas, “Comparing community structure identification,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2005, no. 9, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan, “Finding and evaluating community structure in networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 2, article 026113, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. E. J. Newman, “Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 6, article 066133, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. E. J. Newman, “Modularity and community structure in networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, no. 23, pp. 8577–8582, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. K. M. Newell, Y. T. Liu, and G. Mayer-Kress, “Time scales in motor learning and development,” Psychological Review, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 57–82, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. T. Hannan and J. Freeman, “The population ecology of organizations,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 929–964, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. A. Tsoularis and J. Wallace, “Analysis of logistic growth models,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 21–55, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. van der Maas, K. J. Kan, M. Marsman, and C. E. Stevenson, “Network models for cognitive development and intelligence,” Journal of Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 16, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. L. Katz, “A new status index derived from sociometric analysis,” Psychometrika, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 1953. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. R. Ghosh, S.-h. Teng, K. Lerman, and X. Yan, “The interplay between dynamics and networks,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD '14, pp. 1406–1415, New York, NY, USA, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. P. Borgatti, “Centrality and network flow,” Social Networks, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 55–71, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. U. Pillai, T. Suel, and Seunghun Cha, “The Perron-Frobenius theorem. Some of its applications,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 62–75, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. K. I. Goh, B. Kahng, and D. Kim, “Spectra and eigenvectors of scale-free networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 64, no. 5, article 051903, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. I. Cohen, Y. Huang, J. Chen, and J. Benesty, Noise Reduction in Speech Processing, Vol. 2, Chapter 5, Springer, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. C. Spearman, “The proof and measurement of association between two things,” The American Journal of Psychology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 72–101, 1904. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. J. C. F. de Winter, S. D. Gosling, and J. Potter, “Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data,” Psychological Methods, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 273–290, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. R. B. Cattell, The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences, Springer US, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. E. McAuley, T. Duncan, and V. V. Tammen, “Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis,” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. E. S. Barratt, “Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety,” Psychological Reports, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 547–554, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. P. Kline, The New Psychometrics: Science, Psychology, and Measurement, Routledge, 1998.
  71. R. B. Cattell, “The scree test for the number of factors,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 245–276, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. L. Horn, “A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis,” Psychometrika, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 179–185, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. W. R. Zwick and W. F. Velicer, “Factors influencing four rules for determining the number of components to retain,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 253–269, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. B. Costello and J. W. Osborne, “Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis,” Practical Assessment, Research & Education, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1–9, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  75. L. R. Fabrigar, D. T. Wegener, R. C. Maccallum, and E. J. Strahan, “Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research,” Psychological Methods, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 272–299, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. N. L. Ritter, “A comparison of distribution free and non-distribution free factor analysis methods,” in Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, p. 15, New Orleans, LA, USA, February 2012.
  77. R. R. Nadakuditi and M. E. J. Newman, “Graph spectra and the detectability of community structure in networks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 18, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. M. Montoya, S. L. Pimm, and R. V. Solé, “Ecological networks and their fragility,” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7100, pp. 259–264, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. B. S. Goh, “Global stability in many-species systems,” The American Naturalist, vol. 111, no. 977, pp. 135–143, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. W. Feng and R. M. Bailey, “Stability and critical transitions in mutualistic ecological systems,” bioRxiv, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. J. M. Pastor, J. García-Algarra, J. M. Iriondo, J. J. Ramasco, and J. Galeano, “Dragging in mutualistic networks,” Networks and Heterogeneous Media, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. E. J. Newman, D. J. Watts, and S. H. Strogatz, “Random graph models of social networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, Supplement 1, pp. 2566–2572, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus