Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Complexity
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2380650, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2380650
Research Article

The Union between Structural and Practical Identifiability Makes Strength in Reducing Oncological Model Complexity: A Case Study

1Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/b, 35131 Padova, Italy
2IEIIT-CNR, c/o Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/a, 35131 Padova, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Pia Saccomani; ti.dpinu.ied@aip

Received 9 September 2017; Accepted 14 January 2018; Published 11 February 2018

Academic Editor: Peter Giesl

Copyright © 2018 Maria Pia Saccomani and Karl Thomaseth. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Jayachandran, A. E. Rundell, R. E. Hannemann, T. A. Vik, and D. Ramkrishna, “Optimal chemotherapy for leukemia: a model-based strategy for individualized treatment,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e109623, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. G. dePillis, A. Eladdadi, and A. E. Radunskaya, “Modeling cancer-immune responses to therapy,” Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 461–478, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. L. Bonate and A. B. Suttle, “Modeling tumor growth kinetics after treatment with pazopanib or placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 231–240, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Cappuccio, M. Elishmereni, and Z. Agur, “Cancer immunotherapy by interleukin-21: potential treatment strategies evaluated in a mathematical model,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 14, pp. 7293–7300, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. A. Florian Jr., J. L. Eiseman, and R. S. Parker, “Nonlinear model predictive control for dosing daily anticancer agents using a novel saturating-rate cell-cycle model,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 339–347, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Galante, K. Tamada, and D. Levy, “B7-H1 and a mathematical model for cytotoxic T cell and tumor cell interaction,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 91–102, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. P. Gerlee, “The model muddle: In search of tumor growth laws,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 2407–2411, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Elishmereni, Y. Kheifetz, H. Søndergaard, R. V. Overgaard, and Z. Agur, “An integrated disease/pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model suggests improved interleukin-21 regimens validated prospectively for mouse solid cancers,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e1002206, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Raia, M. Schilling, M. Bohm et al., “Dynamic Mathematical Modeling of IL13-Induced Signaling in Hodgkin and Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma Allows Prediction of Therapeutic Targets,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 693–704, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Ribba, G. Kaloshi, M. Peyre et al., “A tumor growth inhibition model for low-grade glioma treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 5071–5080, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Terranova, M. Germani, F. Del Bene, and P. Magni, “A predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of tumor growth kinetics in xenograft mice after administration of anticancer agents given in combination,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 471–482, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Agur, “From the evolution of toxin resistance to virtual clinical trials: the role of mathematical models in oncology.,” Future Oncology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 917–927, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Ljung, System Identification - Theory For the User, PTR, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., USA, 2nd edition, 1999.
  14. S. Audoly, G. Bellu, L. D’angiò, M. P. Saccomani, and C. Cobelli, “Global identifiability of nonlinear models of biological systems,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Cobelli and M. P. Saccomani, “Unappreciation of a priori identifiability in software packages causes ambiguities in numerical estimates,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 258, no. 6, pp. E1058–E1059, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. P. Saccomani, S. Audoly, and L. D'Angiò, “Parameter identifiability of nonlinear systems: The role of initial conditions,” Automatica, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 619–632, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Meshkat, C. Er-zhen Kuo, and J. DiStefano, “On finding and using identifiable parameter combinations in nonlinear dynamic systems biology models and combos: a novel web implementation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e110261, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Thomaseth, J. J. M. Batzel, R. Bachar, and R. Furlan, “Parameter estimation of a model for baroreflex control of unstressed volume,” in Mathematical Modeling and Validation in Physiology, J. J. Batzel, M. Bachar, and F. Kappel, Eds., pp. 215–246, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. G. Bellu, M. P. Saccomani, S. Audoly, and L. D'Angiò, “DAISY: a new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Buchberger, “An algorithmical criterion for the solvability of algebraic system of equation,” Aequationes Mathematicae, vol. volume 4, 3, pp. 45–50, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Rodriguez-Fernandez, J. R. Banga, and I. Doyle, “Novel global sensitivity analysis methodology accounting for the crucial role of the distribution of input parameters: application to systems biology models,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1082–1102, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. M. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. Rehberg, A. Kremling, and J. R. Banga, “Simultaneous model discrimination and parameter estimation in dynamic models of cellular systems,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 7, article no. 76, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Raue, C. Kreutz, T. Maiwald et al., “Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 1923–1929, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Balsa-Canto and J. R. Banga, “AMIGO, a toolbox for advanced model identification in systems biology using global optimization,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 16, Article ID btr370, pp. 2311–2313, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Hoops, R. Gauges, C. Lee et al., “COPASI—a complex pathway simulator,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 3067–3074, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Beal, L. B. Sheiner, A. Boekmann, and R. J. Bauer, “NONMEM's User's Guides,” in ICON Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. Z. D'Argenio, A. Schumitzky, and X. Wang, “ADAPT 5 Users Guide: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic systems analysis software,” in Biomedical Simulations Resource, Los Angeles, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. Vajda, P. Valko, and T. Turányi, “Principal component analysis of kinetic models,” International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 55–81, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017, http://www.R-project.org.
  30. E. Anderson, Z. Bai, C. Bischof et al., “LAPACK Users' Guide,” in Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 3th edition, 1999. View at Google Scholar