Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Complexity
Volume 2018, Article ID 3615476, 19 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3615476
Research Article

Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation

1Lorentz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
2IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Alexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu; ln.vinunediel.ztnerol@unaebab

Received 19 May 2017; Accepted 17 October 2017; Published 2 January 2018

Academic Editor: Manlio De Domenico

Copyright © 2018 Alexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu and Diego Garlaschelli. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, “Statistical physics of social dynamics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 591–646, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Axelrod, “The dissemination of culture: a model with local convergence and global polarization,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 203–226, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. S. Miguel, “Global culture: a noise-induced transition in finite systems,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 045101, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, “Nonequilibrium transitions in complex networks: a model of social interaction,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 67, no. 2, Article ID 026120, 6 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. N. Kuperman, “Cultural propagation on social networks,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 046139, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Flache and M. W. Macy, “Local convergence and global diversity: the robustness of cultural homophily,” ARXIV: Physics, no. 6, Article ID 0701333, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. C. González-Avella, M. G. Cosenza, and K. Tucci, “Nonequilibrium transition induced by mass media in a model for social influence,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 72, no. 6, Article ID 065102, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Centola, J. C. González-Avella, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, “Homophily, cultural drift, and the co-evolution of cultural groups,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 905–929, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Pfau, M. Kirley, and Y. Kashima, “The co-evolution of cultures, social network communities, and agent locations in an extension of Axelrod's model of cultural dissemination,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 392, no. 2, pp. 381–391, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Battiston, V. Nicosia, V. Latora, and M. S. Miguel, “Robust multiculturality emerges from layered social influence,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article no 1809, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Stivala, Y. Kashima, and M. Kirley, “Culture and cooperation in a spatial public goods game,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 94, no. 3, Article ID 032303, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Valori, F. Picciolo, A. Allansdottir, and D. Garlaschelli, “Reconciling long-term cultural diversity and short-term collective social behavior,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1068–1073, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Stivala, G. Robins, Y. Kashima, and M. Kirley, “Ultrametric distribution of culture vectors in an extended Axelrod model of cultural dissemination,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, article no. 4870, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. I. Băbeanu, L. Talman, and D. Garlaschelli, “Signs of universality in the structure of culture,” The European Physical Journal B, vol. 90, no. 12, 237 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Cont and J.-P. Bouchaud, “Herd behavior and aggregate fluctuations in financial markets,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 170–196, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Thompson, R. J. Ellis, and A. Wildavsky, Cultural Theory, Westview Press, Boulder, Colo, USA, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. P. Fiske, “The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations,” Psychological Review, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 689–723, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. C. Triandis, “The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes,” American Psychologist, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 407–415, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. A. Shweder, N. C. Much, M. Mahapatra, and L. Park, “The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering,” in Morality and Health, A. M. Brandt and P. Rozin, Eds., pp. 119–169, Routledge, NY, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Graham, B. A. Nosek, J. Haidt, R. Iyer, S. Koleva, and P. H. Ditto, “Mapping the moral domain,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 366–385, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Verweij, “Towards a theory of constrained relativism: comparing and combining the work of Pierre Bourdieu, Mary Douglas and Michael Thompson, and Alan Fiske,” Sociological Research Online, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–15, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. R. Bruce, “Uniting theories of morality, religion, and social interaction: Grid-group cultural theory “big three” ethics, and moral foundations theory,” Psychology and Society, vol. 5, pp. 37–50, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Verweij, M. Van Egmond, U. Kühnen, S. Luan, S. Ney, and M. A. Schoop, “I disagree, therefore I am: how to test and strengthen cultural versatility,” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 83–98, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Rayner, “Cultural theory and risk analysis,” in Social Theories of Risk, S. Krimsky and D. Golding, Eds., pp. 83–115, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Tansey and S. Rayner, “Cultural theory and risk,” in Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, R. L. Heath and H. D. O’Hair, Eds., pp. 53–79, Routledge, NY, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Poncela-Casasnovas, M. Gutiérrez-Roig, C. Gracia-Lázaro et al., “Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games,” Science Advances, vol. 2, no. 8, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Elster, The Multiple Self, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985.
  28. E. Fehr and K. Hoff, “Introduction: tastes, castes and culture: the influence of society on preferences,” Economic Journal, vol. 121, no. 556, pp. F396–F412, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Cohn, E. Fehr, and M. A. Marechal, “Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry,” Nature, vol. 516, pp. 86–89, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Cohn, J. Engelmann, E. Fehr, and M. A. Maréchal, “Evidence for countercyclical risk aversion: an experiment with financial professionals,” American Economic Journal, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 860–885, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. H. Schwartz, “Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 1–65, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Nisbett, The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently, The Free Press, NY, USA, 2003.
  33. U. Kühnen and D. Oyserman, “Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 492–499, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Reif and A. Melich, “Euro-barometer 38.1: consumer protection and perceptions of science and technology,” http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/06045.
  35. J. L. Gross and S. Rayner, Measuring culture: a paradigm for the analysis of social organization, Columbia University Press, NY, USA, 1985.
  36. M. Favre and D. Sornette, “A generic model of dyadic social relationships,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID e0120882, pp. 1–16, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. V. Ngampruetikorn and G. J. Stephens, “Bias, belief, and consensus: Collective opinion formation on fluctuating networks,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 94, no. 5, Article ID 052312, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. P. Taylor, “Algorithm for generating integer partitions,” http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/18659/algorithm-for-generating-integer-partitions.