Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Complexity
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 4070496, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4070496
Research Article

Decision-Making Methodologies for Reuse of Industrial Assets

Department of Construction and Manufacturing Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to J. Claver

Received 2 November 2017; Revised 15 December 2017; Accepted 3 January 2018; Published 7 February 2018

Academic Editor: Julio Blanco-Fernández

Copyright © 2018 J. Claver et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Claver, Methodology for the analysis and interpretation of the assets of the Spanish industrial heritage. Application to the study of the assets of the Autonomous Community of Madrid [Ph.D. thesis], Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 2016.
  2. M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods,” International Journal of Operations Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56–66, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. B. Ceballos, M. T. Lamata, and D. A. Pelta, “A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods,” Progress in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 315–322, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. K. M. A.-S. Al-Harbi, “Application of the AHP in project management,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Khodaei Tehrani, A. Fereidunian, and H. Lesani, “Financial planning for the preventive maintenance of power distribution systems via fuzzy AHP,” Complexity, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 36–46, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Ren, D. Xu, H. Cao, S. Wei, L. Dong, and M. E. Goodsite, “Sustainability decision support framework for industrial system prioritization,” AIChE Journal, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 108–130, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Hosseini Firouz and N. Ghadimi, “Optimal preventive maintenance policy for electric power distribution systems based on the fuzzy AHP methods,” Complexity, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 70–88, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. R. Venkata, Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment Using Graphic Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods, Soringer, London, UK, 2013.
  9. E. S. Bakhoum and D. C. Brown, “A hybrid approach using AHP-TOPSIS-entropy methods for sustainable ranking of structural materials,” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 212–224, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Balli and S. Korukoǧlu, “Development of a fuzzy decision support framework for complex multi-attribute decision problems: a case study for the selection of skilful basketball players,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 56–69, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  12. T. Saaty and L. Vargas, Models, methods, concepts & applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  13. S. Attaran and B. Gokhan, “Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Application in Green Building Market Research,” International Review of Management and Marketing, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 122–133, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Cerqua, E. Gigliarelli, and L. Cessari, “Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for energetic rehabilitation of historical buildings,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process, Sorrento, Italy, 2011.
  15. Z. Yaolin, “An application of the AHP in cultural heritage conservation strategy for China,” Canadian Social Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 16–20, 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720060203.002. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Macías Bernal, J. Calama Rodríguez, and M. J. Chávez de Diego, “Modelo de predicción de la vida útil de la edificación patrimonial a partir de la lógica difusa,” Informes de la construcción, vol. 66, no. 533, pp. 1–11, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  17. P. Aragonés-Beltrán, J. Aznar Bellver, J. M. Ferris-Oñate, and M. García-Melón, “Valuation of urban industrial land: An analytic network process approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 322–339, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.076doi. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Claver, M. A. Sebastián, and A. Sanz-Lobera, “Opportunities of the multicriteria methods in the study of immovable assets of the Spanish industrial heritage,” Procedia Engineering (132), pp. 175–182, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  19. T. L. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, vol. 78, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, Springer, 2006.
  21. J. Claver-Gil, M. Á. Sebastián-Pérez, and L. Sevilla-Hurtado, “Metodología para el estudio del patrimonio industrial,” Aplicación a la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. DYNA, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 136–139, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus