Optimal Payments to Connected Depositors in Turbulent Times: A Markov Chain Approach

<div><svg height="12.5155pt" id="M185" style="vertical-align:-3.22717pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 33.8433 12.5155" width="33.8433pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M600 480C600 590 528 650 384 650H143L137 622C222 614 225 607 210 531L130 127C113 41 106 36 23 28L17 0H294L300 28C204 36 195 42 212 127L243 284L314 263C327 263 339 263 352 264C465 271 600 337 600 480ZM508 481C508 351 402 304 329 304C289 304 265 311 250 317L295 559C302 594 310 606 323 611C335 616 350 619 367 619C455 619 508 573 508 481Z" id="g113-81"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.656,3.132)"><path d="M384 354C435 370 515 408 515 502C515 549 494 593 459 616C426 639 384 650 308 650H45V618C127 613 130 606 130 524V127C130 45 125 38 37 33V0H262C342 0 409 12 461 40C521 73 558 124 558 192C558 295 481 336 384 352V354ZM217 365V556C217 587 221 597 229 604C238 611 261 615 288 615C382 615 421 558 421 490C421 406 374 365 266 365H217ZM217 327H264C384 327 457 284 457 183C457 80 383 38 301 38C235 38 217 55 217 127V327Z" id="g58-64"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,12.07,3.132)"><path d="M639 21C616 28 593 39 566 68C542 92 523 117 486 170C457 215 415 282 397 314C472 346 524 398 524 485C524 545 497 590 456 617C417 641 369 650 296 650H43V617C122 612 130 608 130 523V129C130 45 122 38 38 33V0H306V33C225 38 216 45 216 129V282H249C302 282 319 270 336 243C365 195 401 132 436 84C483 18 525 -5 597 -8C610 -9 622 -9 635 -9L639 21ZM216 319V559C216 586 219 596 227 603S250 613 281 613C356 613 429 576 429 469C429 416 413 379 374 348C349 327 316 319 265 319H216Z" id="g58-80"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,18.426,0)"><path d="M300 -147C201 -63 143 98 143 270S200 602 300 686L282 710C136 610 70 450 70 271V270C70 89 136 -72 282 -170L300 -147Z" id="g113-41"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.924,0)"><path d="M285 378C315 398 338 416 353 432C373 451 384 474 384 503C384 579 325 635 236 635H235C182 635 136 610 108 579L65 516L85 496C110 533 150 575 205 575C258 575 300 543 300 481C300 407 232 369 141 339L147 310C163 315 188 321 211 321C268 321 338 284 338 192C338 94 288 40 217 40C160 40 119 68 93 91C85 98 77 97 69 91C60 84 47 71 46 58C44 46 48 35 62 22C75 10 116 -12 162 -12C234 -12 424 62 424 224C424 297 373 359 285 376V378Z" id="g113-52"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.164,0)"><path d="M275 270C275 450 212 609 64 710L45 686C145 604 203 442 203 270S147 -63 45 -147L64 -170C213 -68 275 89 275 270Z" id="g113-42"></path></g></svg> as function of the offer. The blue line illustrates the effect when the offer to the degree 1 depositor is increased while the offer to the degree 2 depositor is kept constant at 0.1, while the red line illustrates the dual case.</div>

Complexity

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Optimal Payments to Connected Depositors in Turbulent Times: A Markov Chain Approach 