Dynamic Matching in Cloud Manufacturing considering Matching Costs

<p>Optimal profit comparison in scenarios <span class="nowrap"><svg height="8.8423pt" id="M176" style="vertical-align:-0.2064009pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 11.0475 8.8423" width="11.0475pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M822 650H589L583 622C660 617 677 607 674 561C672 534 664 481 647 390L600 137H596L273 650H126L120 622C176 620 194 615 207 594C221 571 225 557 214 504L161 257C141 166 129 112 121 85C108 42 83 30 29 28L23 0H260L266 28C193 33 173 42 176 89C178 122 186 172 202 255L256 527H259L583 -8H612L690 390C708 481 720 535 728 558C744 603 756 619 816 622L822 650Z"></path></g></svg>,</span> <span class="nowrap"><svg height="8.68572pt" id="M177" style="vertical-align:-0.0498209pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 8.6074 8.68572" width="8.6074pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M640 650H413L406 622L438 617C475 611 483 605 463 571C422 503 346 400 296 333C264 403 215 529 199 575C189 604 191 614 228 618L262 622L271 650H30L23 622C90 615 97 609 119 553L212 321C222 295 223 285 218 259L193 127C176 39 167 33 82 28L76 0H350L356 28C266 36 257 40 275 127L303 266C308 290 314 302 328 322C396 418 454 493 498 546C551 610 565 616 631 622L640 650Z"></path></g></svg>,</span> and <span class="nowrap"><svg height="8.68572pt" id="M178" style="vertical-align:-0.0498209pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 5.68448 8.68572" width="5.68448pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M405 650H141L135 622C222 616 230 610 215 535L133 116C118 41 113 33 29 28L23 0H289L295 28C209 33 205 40 219 116L298 535C312 609 317 616 399 622L405 650Z"></path></g></svg>.</span></p>

Complexity

Dynamic Matching in Cloud Manufacturing considering Matching Costs

Figure 6