Complexity, Nonlinear Evolution, Computational Experiments, AgentBased Modeling and Big Data Modeling for Complex Social Systems
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Baogui Xin, Fangrui Cao, Wei Peng, Abdelalim A. Elsadany, "A Bertrand Duopoly Game with LongMemory Effects", Complexity, vol. 2020, Article ID 2924169, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2924169
A Bertrand Duopoly Game with LongMemory Effects
Abstract
Reconsidering the Bertrand duopoly game based on the concept of long shortterm memory, we construct a fractionalorder Bertrand duopoly game by extending the integerorder game to its corresponding fractionalorder form. We build such a Bertrand duopoly game, in which both players can make their decisions with longmemory effects. Then, we investigate its Nash equilibria, local stability, and numerical solutions. Using the bifurcation diagram, the phase portrait, time series, and the 01 test for chaos, we numerically validate these results and illustrate its complex phenomena, such as bifurcation and chaos.
1. Introduction
As we know, the game theory is one of hottest academic topics for a long time. There are many types of games, such as the Cournot game [1–7], the Bertrand game [8–14], the Stackelberg game [15–17], the evolutionary game [18], and the mixed game [19]. Many researchers have studied duopoly games with some interesting characteristics, such as bounded rationality [1, 15–17], technology licensing [3, 20], and R&D [6, 13]. Table 1 shows some recent research studies on duopoly games with integerorder difference equations. Generally speaking, the duopoly Bertrand game presents the optimal pricing strategies for two players. As a kind of pricing game, the Bertrand game is an alternative to the Cournot game. The duopoly Bertrand game describes two firms competitively providing a kind of homogeneous product, setting simultaneously prices rather than quantities, and reaching equilibria with the price equal to the marginal cost. In the industrial economics domain, long or shortterm memory effects are widespread with different forms. Classical dynamical Bertrand games mainly have shortterm memory effects. The discretetime dynamical Bertrand game represented by the integerorder difference equation can reveal the length of memory effect by its order number. For example, the firstorder discrete dynamical game can only remember the decisionmaking behaviors during the previous period and the secondorder discrete dynamical game can remember the decisionmaking behaviors during the previous two periods. Although the integerorder difference equation has a powerful expression ability and can represent its complexity evolution characteristics of the duopoly game, it is not very easy for the integerorder discretetime dynamical Bertrand games to reflect longterm memory effects. Thus, it is meaningful to study the discretetime dynamical Bertrand games with fractionalorder calculus.

We can employ two forms of fractionalorder calculus to represent longterm memory effects. The one is the continuous fractionalorder calculus, which mainly corresponds to the integerorder differential calculus. The other is the discrete fractionalorder calculus, which mainly corresponds to the integerorder difference calculus. Many scholars have utilized continuous fractional differential operators to represent memory effects in economics. As an extension of the integerorder difference equation, the fractionalorder difference equation has the function of longterm memory effects, which can make up the deficiency of the integerorder difference equation. The fractional difference equation, named the discrete fractional equation, can also be regarded as the discrete form of a fractional differential equation. Without a doubt, the fractional difference calculus also has a vast application space in the dynamical game. Using the discrete fractional calculus, Xin et al. [21] studied a Cournot game and revealed the evolution mechanism of two firms’ output decisions. Different from Ref. [21], this article will employ the discrete fractionalorder differential calculus to propose a Bertrand game, which can reveal the evolution mechanism of two firms’ price decisions.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we propose a discrete fractionalorder Bertrand duopoly game with longterm memory effects. In Section 3, we study the game’s Nash equilibria and local stability. In Section 4, we numerically verify the results by using bifurcation diagrams, phase portraits, maximal Lyapunov exponents, and the 01 test algorithm. This paper concludes in Section 5.
2. Modelling
In this following, we consider a simple Bertrandtype duopoly common market as mentioned in classic economics. Two firms, labelled by , provide homogeneous products with perfect substitutes and decide their different product prices in the light of the same market rule. During period , let and represent the product price and output of firm , respectively. Following the classical linear inverse demand function, we can obtain the following relationship of and :where is a positive constant and denotes a substitution effect between two products.
Let the marginal costs be linear, i.e., , where is a positive constant and represents the marginal cost. Then, the production profit of firm is
Thus, the marginal profit of firm with respect to is
In the classical dynamical duopoly game, every firm naively think its rivals’ price in period is equal to the same as in period . Obviously, the kind of game has no longmemory effect. In the following, we will introduce the discrete fractionalorder calculus to the classical game; then, both firms make their decisions under a novel dynamical adjustment mechanism with a long memory and local estimation of marginal profit.
Assume that the first firm has no complete knowledge of the market demand function and makes its price decision under a dynamical adjustment mechanism with the bounded rationality and a longterm estimation of marginal profit. If the longterm marginal profit is greater (less) than zero, the firm decides to raise (cut) its product price at next period. Thus, we describe the following adjustment process of the product price:where represents the first firm’s price adjustment speed and represents fractionalorder number, i.e., the longterm memory effect.
Assume that the second firm makes its decision under a dynamical adjustment mechanism with simple rationality and a longterm estimation of marginal profit. That is, its price decision mainly depends on two aspects. The one is its longterm optimal reaction function , and the other is its longterm price . Thus, we write the second firm’s price adjustment mechanism as follows:
Thus, we write the following discretetime fractionalorder Bertrand duopoly game with a long memory:
Remark 1. When , equation (6) degenerates to the following equations:
3. Nash Equilibrium and Local Stability
To obtain equilibria of system (6), we solve the following equations:
Their two Nash equilibria are and . In economics, their equilibria mean the folllowing:(i)The equilibrium means that the best price of the first firm is if the second firm sets its optimal product price . Similarly, the best price of the second firm is if the firm adopts zero price strategy. Obviously, is a bounded equilibrium [22].(ii)The equilibrium means that both firms will maintain their equilibrium prices together because no firm can obtain any extra benefit by deviating unilaterally from its own equilibrium. Obviously, is a nonbounded equilibrium point.
Since the equilibrium has no real economic significance, we only analyze the complexity of the nonbounded equilibrium .
The Jacobian matrix of system (6) computed at is
From [21, 23], we can directly obtain Theorem 1.
Theorem 1. System (5) is locally asymptotically stable at if and eitherwhere , , , and .
4. Numerical Simulation
From [24, 25], we can directly obtain Theorem 2.
Theorem 2. For the following nonlinear system,The equivalent form of system (12) isSo we can rewrite system (5) as the following numerical form:Thus, we can illustrate the complexity of system (5) by using system (14). For equation (14), we set parameters , , , , and the initial point . From Theorem 1, we can obtain the following results: the nonbounded Nash equilibrium , , , , and , so equation (10) holds. Thus, equation (5) is locally asymptotically stable at . Figure 1 validates the results mentioned above.
In the following, we fix parameters and , and the initial point in system (14). We will study chaos by using the bifurcation diagram, the phase portrait, the maximal Lyapunov exponent, and 01 test algorithm for chaos [26–28]. To reveal the complexity of system (14), we will study the influence of two main parameters: longterm memory effect and price adjustment speed.
(a)
(b)
4.1. Complexity with Varying the Order
To illustrate the complexity of system (14), such as bifurcation and chaos, we fix and vary the order with an increment of 0.002. We integrate three subfigures to Figure 2. Figure 2 has the yaxis divided into left and right (for and ) for better readability. The first subfigure is drawn for the bifurcation diagram of firm 1’s price decision. The second subfigure is drawn for the median value of the correlation coefficient. The last subfigure is drawn for the maximal Lyapunov exponent of firm 1’s price decision. Figure 2 shows that the bifurcation diagram is in line with and .
At in Figure 2, we note that and the maximal Lyapunov exponent , which indicate there exists chaos in system (14). To confirm the results in Figure 2, we draw Figure 3 with the abovementioned parameter values. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show that the time series of firms 1 and 2 are nonperiodic. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) demonstrate that the pricing trajectories of in the transformed coordinate of firms 1 and 2 are Brownianlike. Figure 3(e) illustrates that the phase portrait of duopoly pricing is chaotic. They quite well coincide with Figure 2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
4.2. Complexity with Varying the Price Adjustment Speed
To illustrate how the price adjustment speed affects the complexity of system (14), we use abovementioned parameter values, then set the order , and vary the price adjustment speed with an increment of 0.004. We also integrate three subfigures to Figure 4. Figure 4 also has the yaxis divided into left and right (for and ) for better readability. The three subfigures are the bifurcation diagram, the median value of the correlation coefficient, and the maximal Lyapunov exponent of firm 1’s price decision, respectively. Figure 4 also shows that the bifurcation diagram is in line with and .
The phase portrait and time series are similar to those in Section 4.1. For saving readers’ time, we will not demonstrate the consistency between the phase portraits, the time series, the bifurcation diagram, the median value of the correlation coefficient, and the maximal Lyapunov exponent of firm 1’s price decision.
5. Conclusion and Future Developments
Introducing the discrete fractionalorder calculus into the integerorder nonlinear Bertrand game, we obtain a fractionalorder Bertrand game with a long memory. Then, we qualitatively analyze the game’s Nash equilibria and local stability. Finally, we validate these qualitative results and compare the consistency among bifurcation diagrams, phase portraits, time series, the maximal Lyapunov exponent, and the 01 test values.
These results illustrate the complexity of the discrete fractionalorder nonlinear Bertrand game. When the longterm memory effect increases from 0 to 1, the game’s complexity decreases gradually. When the price adjustment speed increases from 0 to 1.8, the game’s complexity increases gradually. So we can design suitable game mechanisms according to actual demand by changing the size of the longterm memory effect or the price adjustment speed.
Also, we can extend some researches in the following potential directions. First, there are many types of games that can be extended by discrete fractionalorder calculus, such as the Edgeworth game or the Bertrand–Edgeworth game or the Cournot–Bertrand game. Second, we can study the control and synchronization of discrete fractionalorder games. Third, we can study the stochastic or fuzzy versions of a discrete fractionalorder game. Fourth, we can construct datadriven models of a discrete fractionalorder game. At last, we can construct discrete fractionalorder models in many scientific fields [29–33].
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant no. ZR2016FM26) and National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 16FJY008).
References
 M. Ueda, “Effect of information asymmetry in Cournot duopoly game with bounded rationality,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 362, no. 8, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Tu and X. Wang, “Research on a dynamic masterslave Cournot triopoly game model with bounded rational rule and its control,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 2353909, 11 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Hsu, L. Liu, X. Henry Wang, and C. Zeng, “Ad valorem versus perunit royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model,” The Manchester School, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 890–901, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Alkhedhairi, “Differentiated Cournot duopoly game with fractionalorder and its discretization,” Engineering Computations, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 781–806, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Xin and Y. Wang, “Stability and Hopf bifurcation of a stochastic Cournot duopoly game in a blockchain cloud services market driven by brownian motion,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 41432–41438, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhou, W. Zhou, T. Chu, Y.X. Chang, and M.J. Huang, “Bifurcation, intermittent chaos and multistability in a twostage Cournot game with R&D spillover and product differentiation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 341, pp. 358–378, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y.h. Zhang, W. Zhou, T. Chu, Y.D. Chu, and J.N. Yu, “Complex dynamics analysis for a twostage Cournot duopoly game of semicollusion in production,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 819–835, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Gori and M. Sodini, “Price competition in a nonlinear differentiated duopoly,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 104, pp. 557–567, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. S. Askar and A. Alkhedhairi, “Dynamic investigations in a duopoly game with price competition based on relative profit and profit maximization,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 367, Article ID 112464, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Xin, W. Peng, and L. Guerrini, “A continuous time Bertrand duopoly game with fractional delay and conformable derivative: modelling, discretization process, Hopf bifurcation and chaos,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 7, p. 84, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ma and W. Lou, “Complex characteristics of multichannel household appliance supply chain with the price competition,” Complexity, vol. 2017, Article ID 4327069, 12 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Fanti, L. Gori, C. Mammana, and E. Michetti, “The dynamics of a Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products: synchronization, intermittency and global dynamics,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 52, pp. 73–86, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Tu, X. Zhan, and X. Mao, “Complex dynamics and chaos control on a kind of Bertrand duopoly game model considering R&D activities,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2017, Article ID 7384150, 13 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Ahmed, A. A. Elsadany, and T. Puu, “On Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated goods,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 251, pp. 169–179, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Yang, Y. Peng, Y. Xiao, and X. Wu, “Nonlinear dynamics of a duopoly Stackelberg game with marginal costs,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 123, pp. 185–191, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Peng and Q. Lu, “Complex dynamics analysis for a duopoly Stackelberg game model with bounded rationality,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 271, pp. 259–268, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Shi, Y. Le, and Z. Sheng, “Analysis of price Stackelberg duopoly game with bounded rationality,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2014, Article ID 428568, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Dong, Y. Zhang, J. Pan, and T. Chen, “Evolutionary game model of stock price synchronicity from investor behavior,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2020, Article ID 7957282, 9 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ma, L. Sun, S. Hou, and X. Zhan, “Complexity study on the Cournot–Bertrand mixed duopoly game model with market share preference,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 28, no. 2, Article ID 023101, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C.H. Wu, “Licensing to a competitor and strategic royalty choice in a dynamic duopoly,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 279, no. 3, pp. 840–853, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Xin, W. Peng, and Y. Kwon, A FractionalOrder Difference Cournot Duopoly Game with Long Memory, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA, 2019.
 G. I. Bischi and A. Naimzada, “Global analysis of a dynamic duopoly game with bounded rationality,” in Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, pp. 361–385, Springer, Birkhuser Boston, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Cermak, I. Gyori, and L. Nechvatal, “On explicit stability conditions for a linear fractional difference system,” Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 651–672, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Chen, X. Luo, and Y. Zhou, “Existence results for nonlinear fractional difference equation,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2011, no. 1, Article ID 713201, pp. 1–12, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G.C. Wu and D. Baleanu, “Discrete fractional logistic map and its chaos,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 283–287, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. A. Gottwald and I. Melbourne, “On the validity of the 01 test for chaos,” Nonlinearity, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1367–1382, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Falconer, G. A. Gottwald, I. Melbourne, and K. Wormnes, “Application of the 01 test for chaos to experimental data,” SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 395–402, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Yuan, S. Zheng, and Z. Alam, “Dynamics analysis and cryptographic application of fractional logistic map,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 615–636, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Chen, B. Xiao, and H. Liu, “Credit risk contagion in an evolving network model integrating spillover effects and behavioral interventions,” Complexity, vol. 2018, Article ID 1843792, 16 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Chen, J. Wang, H. Liu, and Y. He, “Contagion model on counterparty credit risk in the crt market by considering the heterogeneity of counterparties and preferentialrandom mixing attachment,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 520, pp. 458–480, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Chen, Y. Wang, Q. Zeng, and J. Luo, “Network model of credit risk contagion in the interbank market by considering bank runs and the fire sale of external assets,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 542, Article ID 123006, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Xin and M. Sun, “A differential oligopoly game for optimal production planning and water savings,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 269, no. 1, pp. 206–217, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Xin, W. Peng, Y. Kwon, and Y. Liu, “Modeling, discretization, and hyperchaos detection of conformable derivative approach to a financial system with market confidence and ethics risk,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2019, no. 1, p. 138, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Baogui Xin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.