Hybrid TODIM Method with Crisp Number and Probability Linguistic Term Set for Urban Epidemic Situation Evaluation

<table class="table-group" id="tab4"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Alternative</td><td class="align_center">The overall dominance degree</td><td class="align_center"><span style="width: 29.2136ptpx;"><svg height="12.5794pt" id="M175" style="vertical-align:-3.29107pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 29.2136 12.5794" width="29.2136pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M494 514C482 587 419 712 303 712C238 712 174 667 174 603C174 561 205 514 249 449C219 438 187 422 162 407C93 366 23 283 23 177C23 69 87 -12 190 -12C244 -12 288 5 328 33C406 87 444 170 444 249C444 329 404 391 331 475C265 550 222 605 222 627C222 647 238 657 267 657C355 657 421 585 484 499L494 514ZM359 234C359 143 319 30 219 30C172 30 114 75 114 178C114 275 163 343 195 378C212 397 241 415 269 425C305 382 359 313 359 234Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,6.722,0)"><path d="M300 -147C201 -63 143 98 143 270S200 602 300 686L282 710C136 610 70 450 70 271V270C70 89 136 -72 282 -170L300 -147Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.22,0)"><path d="M686 28C612 35 607 44 591 112C563 234 541 360 519 489L489 666L457 658L147 121C100 40 89 36 24 28L17 0H240L250 28C168 34 159 41 190 101L262 237H482C495 180 503 137 510 91C517 47 514 35 441 28L433 0H677L686 28ZM475 280H285L429 541H431L475 280Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,21.464,3.132)"><path d="M250 606C250 634 233 656 203 656C168 656 146 618 146 593C146 564 169 545 192 545C227 545 250 573 250 606ZM227 95L212 119C187 98 152 71 135 71C129 71 128 78 134 102L207 373C219 418 217 451 194 451C165 451 92 411 30 351L44 326C77 353 106 371 114 371C124 371 121 357 117 341L55 97C32 5 46 -12 70 -12C108 -12 191 51 227 95Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,24.52,0)"><path d="M275 270C275 450 212 609 64 710L45 686C145 604 203 442 203 270S147 -63 45 -147L64 -170C213 -68 275 89 275 270Z"></path></g></svg></span></td><td class="align_center">Ranking</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>A</i><sub>1</sub></td><td class="align_center">−8.3051</td><td class="align_center">1.0000</td><td class="align_center">1</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>A</i><sub>2</sub></td><td class="align_center">−14.7634</td><td class="align_center">0.1511</td><td class="align_center">4</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>A</i><sub>3</sub></td><td class="align_center">−13.0708</td><td class="align_center">0.3736</td><td class="align_center">3</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>A</i><sub>4</sub></td><td class="align_center">−11.9680</td><td class="align_center">0.5185</td><td class="align_center">2</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>A</i><sub>5</sub></td><td class="align_center">−15.9131</td><td class="align_center">0.0000</td><td class="align_center">5</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Overall dominance degree for all alternatives.</div>

Complexity

tab4

Table 4

Table 4: Hybrid TODIM Method with Crisp Number and Probability Linguistic Term Set for Urban Epidemic Situation Evaluation 