Research Article
Deep Adaptive Adversarial Network-Based Method for Mechanical Fault Diagnosis under Different Working Conditions
Table 2
Diagnosis results in Experiment 2.
| Method | D⟶E | E⟶D | E⟶F | F⟶E | D⟶F | F⟶D | Average (%) |
| SAE | 55.28 ± 6.85% | 51.32 ± 4.36% | 59.47 ± 4.20% | 61.11 ± 3.54% | 40.25 ± 5.36% | 36.47 ± 4.69% | 50.65 | TCA | 81.66 ± 4.51% | 78.52 ± 5.23% | 75.21 ± 4.20% | 70.34 ± 6.85% | 66.47 ± 7.87% | 64.50 ± 5.24% | 72.78 | DANN | 88.45 ± 4.81% | 85.14 ± 4.15% | 83.41 ± 5.14% | 82.97 ± 5.97% | 76.45 ± 4.78% | 72.34 ± 5.97% | 81.46 | MK-MMD | 94.75 ± 1.12% | 93.84 ± 0.88% | 91.63 ± 1.83% | 92.47 ± 2.04% | 88.62 ± 2.13% | 85.31 ± 0.56% | 91.10 | SFDA | 94.40 ± 0.07% | 92.21 ± 1.02% | 90.02 ± 0.81% | 91.32 ± 1.24% | 87.20 ± 0.34% | 83.07 ± 0.61% | 89.70 | DAAN | 95.41 ± 0.96% | 94.96 ± 0.89% | 93.81 ± 1.21% | 94.07 ± 1.78% | 89.74 ± 3.14% | 87.96 ± 3.67% | 92.65 |
|
|