Research Article  Open Access
Jingru Sun, Mu Peng, Fang Liu, Cong Tang, "Protecting Compressive Ghost Imaging with Hyperchaotic System and DNA Encoding", Complexity, vol. 2020, Article ID 8815315, 13 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8815315
Protecting Compressive Ghost Imaging with Hyperchaotic System and DNA Encoding
Abstract
As computational ghost imaging is widely used in the military, radar, and other fields, its security and efficiency became more and more important. In this paper, we propose a compressive ghost imaging encryption scheme based on the hyperchaotic system, DNA encoding, and KSVD algorithm for the first time. First, a 4dimensional hyperchaotic system is used to generate four long pseudorandom sequences and diffuse the sequences with DNA operation to get the phase mask sequence, and then phase mask matrixes are generated from the sequences. Second, in order to improve the reconstruction efficiency, KSVD algorithm is used to generate dictionary D to sparse the image. The transmission key of the proposed scheme includes the initial values of hyperchaotic and dictionary D, which has plaintext correlation and big key space. Compared with the existing compressive ghost imaging encryption scheme, the proposed scheme is more sensitive to initial values and more complexity and has smaller transmission key, which makes the encryption scheme more secure, and the reconstruction efficiency is higher too. Simulation results and security analysis demonstrate the good performance of the proposed scheme.
1. Introduction
In recent years, with the rapid development of computer network and communication technology, information security issues have become more and more important. As an emerging optical imaging technology [1–3], CGI (computational ghost imaging) has attracted the attention of researchers once it had appeared and has been widely used in military, encryption, radar, and other fields [4, 5]. Therefore, the security of the CGI is especially vital.
CGI is developed based on ghost imaging technology [6], which can transmit image information through one optical path, with simple structure, strong antiinterference ability, and good imaging effect. In 2010, Clemente proposed an image encryption technology based on CGI [7]; as shown in Figure 1, this solution can encrypt plainimages into light intensity values and only requires a bucket detector without spatial resolution to receive the light intensity, which indicates a new research direction for optical information security [8]. To achieve high image reconstruction efficiency, Katz proposed a compressive ghost imaging (CSGI) scheme, which combines CGI with a compressive sensing (CS) algorithm to reduce the number of measurements required for image recovery by an order of magnitude [9–11].
Then, Durfin et al. proposed a CSGI encryption scheme [12]. Zhao et al. further improved the security of optical encryption by utilizing the high fault tolerance of QR encoding, which reduce the size of the transmitted images and enhance the robustness [13]. Wu et al. proposed an optical multipleimage encryption scheme based on CGI, and this method can transmit multiple images at the same time; but with the distance as the keys, it is vulnerable to bruteforce attacks [14]. Zhu et al. use fingerprint technology to produce a phase modulation matrix, the fingerprint has the uniqueness, but it is easy to be obtained, and as a transmitted key, fingerprint is too big [15]. Li et al. proposed a multipleimage CSGI encryption method based on the LWT and XOR operations [16]. Most works in the literature fail to associate the key with plaintext image and have big transmission keys. This motivates us to look for a novel CSGI encryption method with plaintext correlation, smaller transmission keys, larger key spaces, and high image reconstruction efficiency.
Chaos has many excellent characteristics, such as pseudorandomness, ergodicity, and sensitivity to initial points and parameters [17–23] and has been widely used in image encryption and privacy protection [24–28], communication encryption [29], and other fields. Chaotic systems can be divided into lowdimensional chaotic system and highdimensional chaotic system. Lowdimensional chaotic systems such as Henon chaotic system [30, 31] and Tent map [32, 33] et al. were first used in the encryption system [34] but have been proved not security enough [35]. Highdimensional chaotic systems such as threedimensional Lorenz chaotic systems [36, 37], and Chen System [38] and Yu System [39, 40] et al. have more dimensional and higher complexity. Especially hyperchaotic systems [41, 42] have two or more Lyapunov exponents greater than 0 and larger key space and higher complexity. Hyperchaotic systems have been wildly used in chaotic image encryption scheme [28, 43–45]. The DNA encoding and decoding technology [46] is a kind of biological method to process information, which has the characteristics of largescale parallelism, highstorage density, ultralowpower consumption, unique molecular structure, and intermolecular recognition mechanism. DNA has great development prospects in the field of information encryption [47–52]. In this paper, a CSGI encryption scheme based on the hyperchaotic system, DNA and KSVD technologies is proposed. First, given four transmission keys, input the four keys as initial values to the hyperchaoticsystem; second, 4 long chaotic sequences are generated by a hyperchaotic system, then three of them are arranged into a phase sequence, and the other sequence is used to produce a DNA sequence. Third, diffuse the phase sequence with the DNA sequence by DNA operation and then get phase modulation matrixes, which are used as the input of the spatial light modulator (SLM). At the same time, get dictionary matrix D with the original image by KSVD and achieve original signal sparse representation through D. Finally, complete the encryption of the scheme. Compared with the existing CSGI encryption scheme, the proposed scheme has smaller double transmission key, larger key space, high key sensitivity, plaintext correlation, and unpredictability. The use of DNA further increases the complexity and randomness of the encryption scheme.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the basic theories of the CGI, hyperchaotic system, DNA technology, compressed sensing, and singular value decomposition are described. In Section 3, the system framework of our proposed scheme and the generation process of phase mask matrixes are described in detail. The simulation results and security analysis are performed in section 4. The paper is summarized in section 5.
2. Basic Theories
2.1. CGI
In CGI, as shown in Figure 2, a spatial laser beam transmits through a spatial light modulator (SLM), which introduces an arbitrary phase mask matrix , generating a spatially incoherent beam. Knowing the random phase and the distribution of laser light field , one can evaluate the distribution of the light intensity right after the SLM:
Through Fresnel diffraction, the light field distribution of signal light in front of object plane is the same as reference light, the light travels to the object plane which is z distance away from the SLM, and the speckle filed can be calculated:where is the transfer function in the spatial domain at a distance , represents the convolution operation, and is defines as the reference light. The signal light intensities detected by a bucket detector placed behind the object, which can be represented by a transmission function of the object and written as
To construct the object’s transmission function , the reference light speckle filed crosscorrelated with the signal light intensities :where denotes the recovered object information, is an ensemble average over N measurements, is calculated by the receiver according to equation (2), and is the average value for the measured components [53].
2.2. HyperChaotic System
In our proposed CSGI encryption scheme, the phase mask matrix required on the SLM is generated by the hyperchaotic system:
By setting parameters , , , and , we obtain four Lyapunov exponents, including two positive Lyapunov exponents, and , a zero Lyapunov exponent , and a negative Lyapunov exponent [54]. By this means, the system exhibits hyperchaotic behavior. Figure 3 depicts the phase portraits of the hyperchaotic system. Here, we take the fourthorder RungeKutta method to solve (5) and obtain the four hyperchaotic sequences.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
2.3. DNA
DNA is a longchain polymer, and the basic elements are four nucleic acid bases, namely, (adenine), (cytosine), (guanine), and (thymine), where and , and are complementary, respectively. In a binary system, 0 and 1 are complementary. It can be concluded that 00 and 11 are complementary, and 10 and 01 are complementary. Encoding the four bases , , , and with 0 and 1, eight encoding methods can be obtained, as shown in Table 1. Each of the DNA coding rules corresponds to an operation rule, and the following algorithm is based on the encoding rule 1 and rule 2. According to the binary calculation rule, we can get the corresponding rules of DNA addition, subtraction, and complement rule listed in Tables 2 and 3.



2.4. Compressed Sensing
Compressed sensing technology uses sparse basis such as DCT or DFT to represent the signal sparsely, measures the signal based on Gaussian random matrix, and then reconstructs the signal based on L1 norm and other algorithms.
Suppose a signal is , before sampling the signal , select a suitable and orthogonal sparse base to sparsely represent the signal aswhere is the sparse representation of on a sparse basis . has nonzero elements, and other elements’ values are 0.
Sparse operation and the measurement matrix must satisfy restricted isometry property (RIP). Discrete cosine transform, fastFourier transform, etc. are common sparse operations.
During measuring , in order to reduce the number of the measurements and ensure that the measuring result contain as much information of as possible, we need an appropriate measurement matrix . Bernoulli matrix, Gaussian distribution matrix, Hadamar matrix, Toeplitz matrix, etc. are often used in compressed sensing technology. The measurement of signal x can be expressed aswhere is a sensor matrix and is the measurement result.
In the end, use the compressed sensing reconstruction algorithm to reconstruct from :
The approximate solution vector can be obtained by applying inverse transformation for :
2.5. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
Suppose a real matrix can be decomposed can be decomposed intowhere is a singular value matrix whose nonzero elements are only located on the diagonal. and are bothunit orthogonal matrices, and means the left singular matrix and means the right singular matrix, respectively. Generally, is represented as
Decomposing by equation (10), then we can getWith the eigendecomposition of and , the left singular matrix and the right singular matrix can be obtained.
3. Proposed Encryption Scheme of CSGI
The proposed encryption scheme of CSGI includes three main parts: the generated of the phase mask , original image sparse presentation, and CSGI encryption. Next, the implementation processes will be introduced in detail.
3.1. Generation of the Phase Mask Matrix
Chaotic systems have some significant features, such as deterministic, pseudorandomness, and ergodicity, and they are sensitive to initial points and parameters. Supposing that the original image is denoted as , whose size is , the initial values are , , , and and the phase mask matrices can be realized as follows:(1)Use the initial values , , , and to produce four pseudorandom sequences , , , and by iterating equation (5) for times, where . To get rid of transient effect, we discard the first numbers of each sequence.(2)Define two length sequences, named and :(3)Convert sequences and to binary sequence, and then convert and into DNA sequence and , respectively according to DNA encoding rules 1 and 3.(4)According to the DNA complement rule and the new sequence can be obtained.(5)Convert the sequence to decimal, and normalize the phase values so that they are uniformly distributed in the range :(6)Transform the sequence into pixels, and obtain phase mask matrix:(7)Set , , , and , and repeat step 1 to step 6 times, and then we can get phase mask matrices .
3.2. Original Image Sparse Presentation with KSVD
Suppose the original signal (image) is a matrix . is dictionary matrix, and each column of the dictionary is called atomic vector . is the sparse matrix. Ideally, there is , with the original signal sparse representation through . Therefore, solving the dictionary matrix and sparse matrix can be converted into an optimization problem as follows:where is the row vector of the sparse matrix and is the limitation, namely, each row of the sparse matrix has nonzero elements as few as possible. This problem can be converted to a nonconstrained optimization problem by using Lagrangian multiplier method, which is
In order to simplify the optimization problem, is replaced by .
So, the main problem is converted to and two objective optimization problems, and the common method of optimizing is orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) algorithm, which has been discussed in [55]. The optimization of can be described as follows:
Suppose the sparse matrix is known, we can implement the columnwise update of dictionary matrix . is the th row vector of , and denotes residual, sowhere . Aforementioned optimization question can be converted intowhere and become the variables to optimize, and equation (20) can be described as a least squares problem which can be solved by using SVD. Extract all nonzero terms of and then rebuild new matrix . Hence, the optimization turns into
Through SVD, we can get
Replace with the first column vector of left singular matrix, and then get one column of . Multiply the first row of right singular matrix and the largest singular value; afterwards, we can obtain . Replace of sparse matrix with the new result. Singular values of should be ordered from largest to smallest.
Repeat the above steps to update each column of dictionary, and then we can gain the final dictionary matrix and sparse matrix from original signal.
3.3. CSGI Encryption
Figure 4 shows the process of CSGI encryption. The detailed steps are as follows:(1)The phase masks matrices generated in Section 3.1 are uploaded to SLM, and the laser beam is phase modulated by SLM according to equation (1).(2)The sparse matrix and dictionary matrix are gained by sparse representation of the original image according to Section 3.2.(3)The sparse matrix is placed at z distance from the SLM. According to Fresnel diffraction, we can get the light field distribution that can be obtained in the front of the image, and the light field intensity can be further obtained according to equation (2).(4)The total light intensity can be calculated by a bucket detector behind the image according to equation (3).(5)The initial values of the chaotic system and dictionary matrix transmit through the private channel as the transmission key. And, transmits through the public channel.
3.4. Decryption Process
Figure 5 shows the decryption process, and the detailed steps are as follows:(1)The transmission key is received through the private channel , , , , and , and the random phase mask matrices are calculated using the received transmission key according to the method in Section 3.1.(2)The same computed intensity patterns are obtained as step 3 of Section 3.3.(3)The computed intensity patterns are correlated with the total intensities of the light field received from the public mode, and the estimated matrix of is reconstructed, according to equation (3).(4)According to , use dictionary matrix to reconstruct the original image from .
4. Simulation Results and Security Analysis
In this part, the proposed scheme is simulated with MATLAB R2016a to verify the feasibility.
As shown in Figure 6(a), a grayscale image of size is used as the original image. The initial values of the hyperchaotic system are set as , and then referring to the mentioned point in Section 3, we obtain N different random phase mask matrices and the sparse representation of original image which is shown in Figures 6(b) and 6(c). The following is the brief descriptions of the computational complexity of our algorithm and comparison with other algorithms.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
In generation of phase mask matrix, the size of gray image is , the main operations are “addition”, “multiplication,” and “mod”, and then the operand is , where is the number of measurements. In the step of sparse representation, the main operation is the computation of sparse matrix and dictionary matrix , the operand is where the number of iterations is 10, and for projection and image reconstruction, the operand is and , respectively. In order to guarantee the quality of results, we set in our experiments. The total operand is , because the generation of phase mask matrix and sparse representation can be performed simultaneously. Therefore, the computational complexity of CSGI can be expressed as . Compared with other algorithms, the computational complexity of using QR code and compressed sensing to encrypt the image (QRCGIOE) [13] is . And, the method based on the LWT, XOR operations (XORLWTOE) [16], spends most time on the process of measurement, whose computational complexity can be expressed as . These illustrate that the computational complexity of the method used in this paper is identical to some relatively new algorithms’, whereas our algorithm have better performance and less times of the measurement, which is stated below.
During the encryption of the CSGI, the wavelength of the plane wave is selected 0.532 . The image is placed at a distance from the SLM, and the transmitted light is collected into a bucket detector. Then, the image can be reconstructed according to Section 3.4 and Figure 6(c).
4.1. Key Space Analysis
If the cryptographic scheme has enough large key space, it can resist bruteforce attacks. Here, the transmission keys are , , , , and D. D is smaller and can be ignored. The operational precision of the computer is , and the key space of our proposed scheme is , which is much larger than the security requirement of the key space . Thus, the key space of our proposed scheme is strong enough and can effectively resist bruteforce attacks.
4.2. Key Sensitivity Analysis
A highly secure computation ghost imaging system must be sensitive to the key. To verify the security performance of our proposed scheme, a security test is carried out. The private keys are set as . In decryption process, we change the value of the private keys to and then use to reconstruct the image. The sampled object is shown in Figure 7. Obviously, the information related to the plaintext image cannot be obtained when the private key is changed slightly.
(a)
(b)
(c)
4.3. Correlation Analysis
To evaluate the quality of the reconstructed image, the correlation coefficient between the reconstructed image and the original image can be calculated bywhere and are the square deviations of the reconstructed image and the original image, respectively, and . The larger the correlation coefficient, the better the imaging effect. Ideally, the correlation coefficient .
In order to get a good reconstruction result, we performed a lot of experiments by changing the measurement . The value of Figures 8(a)–8(c) is 0.2418, 0.5494, and 0.9533 Obviously, from left to right, the reconstructed image is getting better.
(a)
(b)
(c)
The comparison experiments for compressed sensing using different sparse basis such as DCT, DFT, and KSVD are conducted on Lena. Besides, simulation of QRCGIOE and XORLWTOE is conducted in this experiment. Figure 9 shows the curve of the correlation coefficient change with the measurement based on several different means, the abscissa represents the number of measurements, the ordinate represents the correlation coefficient between the decrypted image and the original image. As shown in Figure 9, the correlation coefficient increases with the increase of measurement. The reconstructed image with high quality can be obtained with the increase of the measurement number. In addition, the result suggests that based on KSVD sparse representation, a highquality image can be reconstructed in less measurements than other methods.
Make measurement 3000 times on Lena, and the reconstructed images are shown in Figures 10(b)–10(f). The value of DCT, DFT, QRCGIOE, XORLWTOE, and KSVD is 0.7353, 0.7821, 0.4540, 0.6248, and 0.9729, respectively. Then, we compare maximum and measurements of KSVD with other sparse basics and algorithms, as shown in Table 4. By the way, after measuring 7100 times, the decrypted QR code can just be recognized and original image can be restored in QRCGIOE.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)

4.4. NIST Statistical Test
In this paper, the NIST SP 80022 test suite [56] is used to analyse randomness and discover potential defects in the structure of the pseudorandom sequence generator. During the test, we used the default values that came with the NIST test. The test result is expressed as . According to NIST test rules, to pass the test, has to be greater than 0.01. The pseudorandom sequences generated by the hyperchaotic map are successfully passed the NIST SP 80022 statistical test. The test results are listed in Table 5.

4.5. Noise Addition
As the phase mask matrices may be attacked by noise, to test the robustness of this scheme, we add Gaussian noise, salt and pepper noise, and speckle noise on the phase mask matrices, respectively. As shown in Figure 11, Figure 11(a) is the decryption image when the phase mask matrices are added; for Gaussian noise, mean value is zero and variance is 0.005 and ; Figure 11(b) is added Salt and pepper noise, density is 0.005, and ; Figure 11(c) is added speckle noise, mean is zero, variance is 0.01, and the . Obviously, the proposed scheme can resist noise attacks well.
(a)
(b)
(c)
5. Conclusion
In this paper, a CSGI encryption scheme based on hyperchaoticsystem and DNA and KSVD technology is proposed for the first time. The hyperchaotic system is used to generate four long pseudorandom sequences, the sequences are diffused with DNA operation, and then the phase mask matrices for encryption can be obtained. The original image is sparse by dictionary D generated by KSVD. The transmission key of the scheme is composed with the initial values of the hyperchaotic system and the dictionary D. Compared with the existing scheme, the proposed scheme has a small transmission key which ensures the security of the private key, big key space, highly sensitive to the key, high complexity, and strong plaintext correlation and ensures the security of the scheme. Simulation results and security analysis show that the proposed scheme can resist most of the known attacks well and has high security and great performance.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supposed by the Science and Technology Project of Hunan Provincial Communications Department, China (Grant No.2018037), and the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 61674054 and 91964108).
References
 D. N. Klyshko, “A simple method of preparing pure states of an optical field, of implementing the EinsteinPodolskyRosen experiment, and of demonstrating the complementarity principle,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 74–85, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. B. Pittman, Y. H. Shih, D. V. Strekalov, and A. V. Sergienko, “Optical imaging by means of twophoton quantum entanglement,” Physical Review A, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. R3429–R3432, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. S. Bennink, S. J. Bentley, and R. W. Boyd, “TwoPhoton” coincidence imaging with a classical source,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 11, Article ID 113601, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Tang, Y. Bai, C. Duan, S. Nan, Q. Shen, and X. Fu, “Effects of incident angles on reflective ghost imaging through atmospheric turbulence,” Laser Physics, vol. 28, no. 1, Article ID 015201, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Gao, Y. Bai, and X. Fu, “Pointspread function in ghost imaging system with thermal light,” Optics Express, vol. 24, no. 22, pp. 25856–25866, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. H. Shapiro, “Computational ghost imaging,” Physical Review A, vol. 78, no. 6, Article ID 061802, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Clemente, V. Durán, V. TorresCompany, and J. Lancis, “Optical encryption based on computational ghost imaging,” Optics Letters, vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 2391–2393, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Tanha, R. Kheradmand, and S. AhmadiKandjani, “Grayscale and color optical encryption based on computational ghost imaging,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 101, no. 10, Article ID 101108, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 O. Katz, Y. Bromberg, and Y. Silberberg, “Compressive ghost imaging,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95, no. 13, Article ID 131110, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 Q. Xu, K. Sun, C. Cao, and C. Zhu, “A fast image encryption algorithm based on compressive sensing and hyperchaotic map,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 121, pp. 203–214, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Xu, K. Sun, S. He, and C. Zhu, “An effective image encryption algorithm based on compressive sensing and 2dslim,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 134, Article ID 106178, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 V. Duran, P. Clemente, E. Tajahuerce et al., “Optical encryption with compressive ghost imaging,” in Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Lasers & ElectroOptics Europe & 12th European Quantum Electronics Conference CLEO EUROPE/EQEC, Munich, Germany, May 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Zhao, L. Wang, W. Liang, W. Cheng, and L. Gong, “High performance optical encryption based on computational ghost imaging with QR code and compressive sensing technique,” Optics Communications, vol. 353, pp. 90–95, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Wu, Z. Xie, Z. Liu, W. Liu, Y. Zhang, and S. Liu, “Multipleimage encryption based on computational ghost imaging,” Optics Communications, vol. 359, pp. 38–43, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhu, X. Yang, X. Meng et al., “Computational ghost imaging encryption based on fingerprint phase mask,” Optics Communications, vol. 420, pp. 34–39, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Li, X. Meng, X. Yang et al., “Multipleimage encryption via lifting wavelet transform and XOR operation based on compressive ghost imaging scheme,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 102, pp. 106–111, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Álvarez and S. Li, “Some basic cryptographic requirements for chaosbased cryptosystems,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2129–2151, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Lin, C. Wang, and Y. Tan, “Hidden extreme multistability with hyperchaos and transient chaos in a Hopfield neural network affected by electromagnetic radiation,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 2369–2386, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Li, B. Feng, S. Li, J. Kurths, and G. Chen, “Dynamic analysis of digital chaotic maps via statemapping networks,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2322–2335, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Lin, C. Wang, Y. Sun, and W. Yao, “Firing multistability in a locally active memristive neuron model,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 3667–3683, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, T. Lei, X. Zhang, C. Li, and S. Jafari, “Hyperchaotic oscillation in the deformed rikitake twodisc dynamo system induced by memory effect,” Complexity, vol. 2020, Article ID 8418041, 10 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 Q. Deng, ““Multiscroll hidden attractors with two stable equilibrium points,” Chaos,” An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 29, Article ID 093112, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, C. Wang, W. Yao, and H. Lin, “Chaotic system with bondorbital attractors,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 2159–2174, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Xu, J. Sun, and C. Wang, “An image encryption algorithm based on random walk and hyperchaotic systems,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 30, no. 4, Article ID 2050060, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Yu, Z. Zhang, L. Liu et al., “Secure communication scheme based on a new 5D multistable fourwing memristive hyperchaotic system with disturbance inputs,” Complexity, vol. 2020, no. 9, pp. 1–16, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Wang, C. Wang, and C. Xu, “An image encryption algorithm based on a hidden attractor chaos system and the KnuthDurstenfeld algorithm,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 128, Article ID 105995, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Li, D. Lin, B. Feng, J. Lü, and F. Hao, “Cryptanalysis of a chaotic image encryption algorithm based on information entropy,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 75834–75842, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Xu, J. Sun, and C. Wang, “A novel image encryption algorithm based on bitplane matrix rotation and hyper chaotic systems,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 79, no. 910, pp. 5573–5593, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Yu, L. Liu, H. Shen et al., “Dynamic analysis, circuit design, and synchronization of a novel 6D memristive fourwing hyperchaotic system with multiple coexisting attractors,” Complexity, vol. 2020, Article ID 5904607, 17 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Li and H. Liu, “Colour image encryption based on advanced encryption standard algorithm with twodimensional chaotic map,” IET Information Security, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 265–270, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Liu and A. Kadir, “Asymmetric color image encryption scheme using 2D discretetime map,” Signal Processing, vol. 113, pp. 104–112, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Li, G. Luo, K. Qin, and C. Li, “An image encryption scheme based on chaotic tent map,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Zhu and K. Sun, “Cryptanalyzing and improving a novel color image encryption algorithm using RTenhanced chaotic tent maps,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 18759–18770, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Liu, Q. Zhang, and X. Wei, “A rgb image encryption algorithm based on DNA encoding and chaos map,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1240–1248, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Wang, D. Xiao, X. Chen, and H. Huang, “Cryptanalysis and enhancements of image encryption using combination of the 1D chaotic map,” Signal Processing, vol. 144, pp. 444–452, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Bigdeli, Y. Farid, and K. Afshar, “A novel image encryption/decryption scheme based on chaotic neural networks,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 753–765, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang, H. Song, and P. Liu, “A novel hybrid color image encryption algorithm using two complex chaotic systems,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 77, pp. 118–125, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Chen and T. Ueta, “Yet another chaotic attractor,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 14651466, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Yu, L. Liu, H. Shen et al., “Multistability analysis, coexisting multiple attractors and FPGA implementation of YuWang fourwing chaotic system,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 7530976, 16 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Yu, S. Qian, X. Chen et al., “A new 4D fourwing memristive hyperchaotic system: dynamical analysis, electronic circuit design, shape synchronization and secure communication,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 30, no. 10, Article ID 2050147, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 Q. Deng, C. Wang, and L. Yang, “FourWing hidden attractors with one stable equilibrium point,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 30, no. 6, Article ID 2050086, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Yuan, Y. Deng, Y. Li, and G. Chen, “A cascading method for constructing new discrete chaotic systems with better randomness,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 29, no. 5, Article ID 053120, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Zhou and C. Wang, “A novel image encryption scheme based on conservative hyperchaotic system and closedloop diffusion between blocks,” Signal Processing, vol. 171, Article ID 107484, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Cheng, C. Wang, and H. Chen, “A novel color image encryption algorithm based on hyperchaotic system and permutationdiffusion architecture,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 29, no. 9, Article ID 1950115, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Sun, C. Li, T. Lu, A. Akgul, and F. Min, “A memristive chaotic system with hypermultistability and its application in image encryption,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Zheng, J. Xu, and W. Li, “Parallel DNA arithmetic operation based on nmoduli set,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 177–184, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Chai, Y. Chen, and L. Broyde, “A novel chaosbased image encryption algorithm using DNA sequence operations,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 88, pp. 197–213, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Zhu, and S. Unar, “Image encryption scheme based on Chaos and DNA plane operations,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 78, no. 18, pp. 26111–26128, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Ravichandran, P. Praveenkumar, J. B. B. Rayappan, and R. Amirtharajan, “DNA chaos blend to secure medical privacy,” IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 850–858, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. A. K. Patro, B. Acharya, and V. Nath, “Secure, lossless, and noiseresistive image encryption using chaos, hyperchaos, and DNA sequence operation,” IETE Technical Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 223–245, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. A. K. Patro, M. P. J. Babu, K. P. Kumar, and B. Acharya, “Duallayer DNAencodingdecoding operation based image encryption using onedimensional chaotic map,” in Proceedings of the Advances in Data and Information Sciences–ICDIS 2019, pp. 67–80, Agra, India, March 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 L. M. Zhang, K. H. Sun, W. H. Liu, and S. B. He, “A novel color image encryption scheme using fractionalorder hyperchaotic system and DNA sequence operations,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 98–106, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Bromberg, O. Katz, and Y. Silberberg, “Ghost imaging with a single detector,” Physical Review A, vol. 79, no. 5, Article ID 053840, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Yujun, W. Xingyuan, W. Mingjun, and Z. Huaguang, “A new hyperchaotic system and its circuit implementation,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3518–3524, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. T. Cai and L. Wang, “Orthogonal matching pursuit for sparse signal recovery with noise,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 4680–4688, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. L. Rukhin, J. Soto, J. R. Nechvatal et al., “SP 80022 rev. 1a. A statistical test suite for random and pseudorandom number generators for cryptographic applications,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1645–2179, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Jingru Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.