Conference Paper
Critical Analysis of Electromagnetic Hyperthermia Randomized Trials: Dubious Effect and Multiple Biases
Table 13
Comparison of distortion factors of SMAC and Issels et al. [
23] samples.
| | Factor |
Issels et al. [23] | SMAC [38] | Distortion |
| | STS of extremities | 44% | 58% | 14% | | Surgery | 90% | 100% | 10% | | RT | 63% | 47% | −16% | | Neoadjuvant ChT | 97% | 0% | −97% | | Adjuvant ChT | 58% | 100% | 42% |
| | Total | 352% | 305% | −47% |
|
|
