Critical Analysis of Electromagnetic Hyperthermia Randomized Trials: Dubious Effect and Multiple Biases

Table 4

Analysis of impact of biases in Jones et al. [12] clinical trial.

Factor	Value	Possible CLR gain
Preselection of “heatable” patients	11%	+10%
Preselection of RT-resistant patients	36%	+10%
RT dose bias	10%	+50%–100%
Median age	−7 years	Unpredictable gain
Tumor size	Unknown	+30%–50% [5, 7–9]
Total weight		>60%