Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Cardiology
Volume 2017, Article ID 8407530, 4 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8407530
Case Report

Augmenting Function for Infarction from Infection: Impella 2.5 for Ischemic Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Sepsis

1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
2Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
4Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Praveen George; ude.mmu@egroegp

Received 26 October 2016; Revised 15 January 2017; Accepted 18 January 2017; Published 5 February 2017

Academic Editor: Expedito E. Ribeiro

Copyright © 2017 Praveen George et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Engström, K. Sjauw, J. Baan et al., “Long-term safety and sustained left ventricular recovery: long-term results of percutaneous left ventricular support with Impella LP2.5 in ST-elevation myocardial infarction,” EuroIntervention, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 860–865, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. W. O'Neill, N. S. Kleiman, J. Moses et al., “A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The PROTECT II Study,” Circulation, vol. 126, no. 14, pp. 1717–1727, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Seyfarth, D. Sibbing, I. Bauer et al., “A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 19, pp. 1584–1588, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. M. Brown, M. J. Lanspa, J. P. Jones et al., “Survival after shock requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy,” Chest, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 664–671, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Osman, A. El-Husseini, M. Kamal, A. Refaie, H. Sheashaa, and M. Sobh, “Does timing of post-renal transplant diuresis affect graft survival in live-donor renal transplants?” BJU International, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 284–287, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. Singh, A. Yarkoni, and W. W. O'Neill, “Emergent use of Impella CP™ during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: transaortic access,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 160–163, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. G. Andrade, H. Al-Saloos, A. Jeewa, G. G. S. Sandor, and A. Cheung, “Facilitated cardiac recovery in fulminant myocarditis: pediatric use of the Impella LP 5.0 pump,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 96–97, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Colombo, A. Garatti, G. Bruschi et al., “First successful bridge to recovery with the Impella Recover 100 left ventricular assist device for fulminant acute myocarditis,” Italian Heart Journal, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 642–645, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. M. Cheng, K. D. Sjauw, J. Baan et al., “Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials,” European Heart Journal, vol. 30, no. 17, pp. 2102–2108, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. D. Reesink, A. L. Dekker, V. Van Ommen, C. Soemers, G. G. Geskes, and F. H. Van Der Veen, “Miniature intracardiac assist device provides more effective cardiac unloading and circulatory support during severe left heart failure than intraaortic balloon pumping,” Chest, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 896–902, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. P. S. Henriques, D. M. Ouweneel, S. S. Naidu et al., “Evaluating the learning curve in the prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subanalysis of the PROTECT II study,” American Heart Journal, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 472–479.e5, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. B. Shah, M. C. Smallfield, D. G. Tang, R. Malhotra, R. H. Cooke, and V. Kasirajan, “Mechanical circulatory support devices in the ICU,” Chest, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 848–857, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. S. Naidu, “Novel percutaneous cardiac assist devices: the science of and indications for hemodynamic support,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 533–543, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Fuchs, C. E. Chronaki, S. Park et al., “ICU admission characteristics and mortality rates among elderly and very elderly patients,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1654–1661, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Prevalence of coronary heart disease—United States, 2006–2010,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 60, no. 40, pp. 1377–1381, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Elixhauser, B. Friedman, and E. Stranges, Septicemia in U.S. Hospitals, 2009: Statistical Brief #122, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US), Rockville, Md, USA, 2006–2011.
  17. V. D. Mayr, M. W. Dünser, V. Greil et al., “Causes of death and determinants of outcome in critically ill patients,” Critical Care, vol. 10, no. 6, article R154, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. M. Yealy, J. A. Kellum, D. T. Huang et al., “A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 18, pp. 1683–1693, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus