Isolated Interrupted Aortic Arch: Unexpected Diagnosis in a 63-Year-Old Male
A 63-year-old male with history of hypertension, dyspnea on exertion, and chronic chest pain was admitted for elective cardiac angiography. Arterial blood pressure was 160/90 mmHg in both arms. Femoral and popliteal pulses were extremely weak, and third (S3) and fourth (S4) heart sounds were audible. Aortography showed a mildly dilated aortic root with double brachiocephalic trunk and interruption of aortic arch at isthmus. Profuse and well-developed collaterals appeared at neck and thorax. The patient was recommended to take medical treatment for his hypertension and advanced heart failure. The aim of this paper, is to review the diagnostic and therapeutic options for treatment of the interrupted aortic arch.
Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is a very rare congenital malformation associated with other congenital cardiac defects. It is defined as complete absence of luminal continuity between the ascending and descending portions of the aorta [1–4]. IAA is rare in adult patients. The majority of patients die from this anomaly before adulthood [2–6].
2. Case Report
In April 2009, a 63-year-old man presented to our outpatient clinic with the chief complaint of fatigue, dyspnea, and chest pain for a period of six months with regular activity. He became increasingly symptomatic one month prior to his visit to the clinic. He had history of hypertension and progressive dyspnea for four years evident from his medical records. Social history was significant for smoking. On exam, his arterial blood pressure was 160/90 mmHg on upper extremity and extremely weak lower extremities femoral and popliteal pulses. Dorsal is pedis and tibialis anterior pulses were not palpable. Two-plus pitting edema was present in lower extremities. S3 and S4 were audible. Breath sounds were clear on auscultation. chest radiography showed increase cardiothoracic ratio.
The patient was scheduled for cardiac catheterization. During cardiac angiography, we attempted to pass a guidewire to the aortic arch from right femoral artery without success. Radio contrast injection revealed complete occlusion of proximal portion of descending aorta (Figure 1). We then proceeded with catheterization via right brachial artery, left ventricular dye injection, and selective coronary angiography. The study revealed moderately enlarged left ventricle (LV) cavity with severely depressed LV contraction with global hypokinesia, (Figure 2). Estimated Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) was about 20%. Aortography revealed mildly dilated ascending aorta with double brachiocephalic artery trunk and interrupted aortic arch in the isthmus (Figures 3 and 4). Evaluation of coronary vessels showed no obstructive lesion (Figure 5). Profuse and well-developed collateral vessels were observed in the lower neck and upper thoracic region (Figure 6).
Patient was referred to cardiothoracic surgery service for surgical correction. Patient refused surgery. He was subsequently followed with the cardiology service for the next Ten months. He expired at home from myocardial infarction.
IAA is a very rare congenital anomaly that occurs in 3 per million live births and accounts for 1% of all congenital heart diseases [2, 7]. Clinical presentation of IAA is discovered at infancy. IAA is associated with severe congestive heart failure. A ventricular septal defect is usually present as well as a patent ductus arteriosus. Patent ductus arteriosus is needed for perfusion of the descending aorta. The development of collateral vessels is progressive. Death within the first days of life is due to closure of the patent ductus arteriosus. Spontaneous closure of a muscular ventricular septal defect is always possible as well as a progressive stenosis of the ductus arteriosus. If left ventricle is untreated, 90% of the affected infants die at a median age of 4 days [4, 8].
Based on Celoria and Patton classification, IAA is divided into 3 types:(1)discontinuity distal to the left subclavian artery (type A, 43% of cases);(2) interruption between the left carotid and left subclavian arteries (type B, 53% of cases);(3)interruption between the innominate and left carotid arteries (type C, <4% of cases) .
Careful physical examination of the lower- and upper-peripheral pulses in young adults with chief complain of hypertension is of outmost importance. It provides the first clue to the diagnosis of IAA and coarctation of aorta. Currently, noninvasive diagnostic techniques such as echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of heart are preferred tools for diagnosis of IAA . Our patient, presented with history of chest pain and catheter angiography, was the first preferred diagnostic modality and IAA was an incidental finding. We suspected coarctation of aorta because of the difference between upper and lower extremities arterial blood pressure and pulses. Cardiac catheterization supported the diagnosis of IAA. In addition, profuse collaterals along with loss of antegrade flow to descending aorta and bifid brachiocephalic artery were in favor of IAA. Diagnosis IAA and coarctation of aorta are suggested with the presence of filling defect in the descending aorta and failure of contrast to communicate with the proximal portion of aortic arch. Surgical correction of this anomaly is the definite treatment [1–3, 8]. Incidental diagnosis of IAA in persons older than 50 years old associated with cardiac symptoms raises an important question on benefit of surgery. Patients diagnosed with interruption of the aortic arch in adulthood might be displaying progression of undiagnosed coarctation of aorta. Three-dimensional computed tomography is useful to detect the obstructive lesion and to guide the surgical approach .
Conflict of Interests
Authors do not have any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflict of interests include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.
C. R. Canova, T. Carrel, P. Dubach, M. Turina, and W. H. Reinhart, “Interrupted aortic arch: fortuitous diagnosis in a 72-year old female patient with severe aortic insufficiency,” Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 125, no. 1-2, pp. 26–30, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
G. Messner, G. J. Reul, S. D. Flamm, I. D. Gregoric, and U. T. Opfermann, “Interrupted aortic arch in an adult: single-stage extra-anatomic repair,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 118–121, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
C. L. Backer and C. Mavroudis, “Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and database project: patent ductus arteriosus, coarctation of the aorta, interrupted aortic arch,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 69, supplement 4, pp. S298–S307, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
M. Alam, L. Simpson, S. S. Virani, B. Cheong, P. Loyalka, and A. B. Civitello, “Incidental diagnosis of interrupted aortic arch in a 72-year-old man,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 494–495, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
R. L. Collins, M. Dick, and L. Parisi Buckley, “Interrupted aortic arch in infancy,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 959–962, 1976.View at: Google Scholar
G. C. Celoria and R. B. Patton, “Congenital absence of the aortic arch,” American Heart Journal, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 407–413, 1959.View at: Google Scholar