Case Reports in Critical Care

Case Reports in Critical Care / 2014 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 902541 | 4 pages |

Mechanical Ventilation Weaning in Inclusion Body Myositis: Feasibility of Isokinetic Inspiratory Muscle Training as an Adjunct Therapy

Academic Editor: Nicolas Nin
Received08 May 2014
Accepted12 Jul 2014
Published24 Jul 2014


Inclusion body myositis is a rare myopathy associated with a high rate of respiratory complications. This condition usually requires prolonged mechanical ventilation and prolonged intensive care stay. The unsuccessful weaning is mainly related to respiratory muscle weakness that does not promptly respond to immunosuppressive therapy. We are reporting a case of a patient in whom the use of an inspiratory muscle-training program which started after a two-week period of mechanical ventilation was associated with a successful weaning in one week and hospital discharge after 2 subsequent weeks.

1. Introduction

In 1971, the term “inclusion body myositis” (IBM) was coined to describe a subset of patients with chronic myositis, whose muscle biopsy showed besides inflammation, muscle fibres containing vacuoles and abnormal filaments, and characteristic inclusions in cytoplasm and nucleus [1]. The inclusion body myositis is grouped with dermatomyositis and polymyositis as idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [2]. The disease is characterized by a proximal myopathy, which progressively leads to functional disability. It is more common in adults in their fifties [1, 2]. Respiratory complications can reach a prevalence of 45%. Weakness/fatigue of respiratory muscles with interstitial pneumonia and dysphagia are the main causes of death [24]. The use of mechanical ventilation is required in most cases, but weaning is hardly achieved [4, 5]. We are reporting a case in whom an inspiratory muscle training program (IMT) using an isokinetic electronic load device which started after a two-week period of mechanical ventilation was associated with a successful weaning in one week.

2. Case Report

A 43-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care of the hospital with symmetrical muscle weakness in the pelvic and scapular girdles. He reported a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome in 2005 without motor sequelae. His initial laboratory exams were haemoglobin of 16.1 g/dL; leukocytes of 13,030/mm3 with 3% young forms and 13% of lymphocytes; urea of 23 mg/dL; creatinine of 0.34 mg/dL; Na of 131 mEq/L; K of 5.5 mEq/L; Cl of 97 mEq/L; AST of 51 U/L; ALT of 49 U/L; lactate of 1.1 mEq/L; LDL of 926 U/L; CK of 145 U/L; and CRP of 4.6 mg/dL.

He evolved with acute respiratory failure type II (PaO2 < 60 mmHg and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg) requiring orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation that was set on a pressure controlled mode. His cerebrospinal fluid showed the presence of lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages, blood cultures were negative for bacterial or fungal agents, and serological tests for toxoplasmosis, herpes, varicella, and HIV were all negative. A deltoid muscle biopsy showed a mononuclear interstitial inflammatory infiltrate with fibres exhibiting rimmed vacuoles, findings that were thought to be compatible with the diagnosis of inclusion body myositis.

During his stay in the ICU, he received a course of intravenous immunoglobulin (0.4 g/kg per day for 5 days) and oral prednisone (1 mg/kg per day) without improvement [4]. In the same period, he developed nosocomial pneumonia and septic shock and was managed with vasoactive amines and intravenous antibiotic therapy (meropenem combined with polymyxin B).

After three unsuccessful weaning trials, the patient was tracheotomised on the 14th day of intubation and transferred to the prolonged ventilation unit. Following hemodynamic stabilization and infection control, azathioprine 150 mg per day [4] was started in association with a inspiratory muscle training (IMT) program using an isokinetic electronic load device (POWERbreathe K-5, London, UK), 2 daily sessions of 30 respiratory cycles as previously described [9], with a load of 30% of the expected maximal inspiratory pressure as described elsewhere [1012]. Load and intensity were reassessed weekly using commercial software (BreatheLink, POWERbreathe Co., London, UK). During the period of treatment, the patient comfortably remained under pressure support ventilation (frequency < 30). The IMT program was accompanied by an early mobilization protocol (active member exercising in bed followed by resistance exercising against gravity at the bedside, evolving to standing position and cycle ergometer activity) [13].

At the start of the new therapeutic program, the measured respiratory parameters of the patient were static compliance of 55 mL/cm H2O, SpO2 of 95% (FIO2 35%), breathing frequency of 21 bpm, tidal volume of 0.390 L, an f/Vt index of 54 bpm/L, P0.1 of 4.66 cm H2O, MIP of 20 cm H2O (17% of the expected value of 118 cm H2O), and timed inspiratory effort (TIE) index of 0.54 cm H2O/sec (~50% of the expected value). The muscle function evaluation of the patient at the beginning of the training program showed an Medical Research Council (MRC) score of 22 (see Table 1), while the correspondent values for the degree of independence of the patient as assessed by the motor domain of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score was 14; see Table 2.

MusclesBefore treatmentAfter treatment

Biceps brachii3/35/5
Triceps brachii1/14/4
Extensor carpi radialis3/35/5
Quadriceps femoris1/14/4
Tibialis anterior2/24/4


MRC scoring system. 0: no movement; 1: palpable contraction, no visible movement; 2: movement but only with gravity eliminated; 3: movement against gravity; 4: movement against resistance but weaker than normal; 5: normal power. [6].

ParametersBefore treatmentAfter treatment

(1) Eating17
(2) Grooming17
(3) Bathing/showering16
(4) Dressing upper body16
(5) Dressing lower body16
(6) Toileting17
(7) Bladder management27
(8) Bowel management mobility27
(9) Transfers: bed/chair/wheelchair17
(10) Transfers: toilet17
(11) Locomotion: walking/wheelchair17
(12) Locomotion: stairs17


FIM scoring. 7: complete independence, fully independent; 6: modified independence requiring the use of a device but no physical help; 5: supervision requiring only standby assistance or verbal prompting or help with setup; 4: minimal assistance requiring incidental hands-on help only (subject performs >75% of the task); 3: moderate assistance; subject still performs 50–75% of the task; 2: maximal assistance; subject provides less than half of the effort (25–49%); and 1: total assistance; subject contributes <25% of the effort or is unable to do the task [7, 8].

After two weeks of IMT, the MIP increased to 28 cm H2O, the TIE index to 1.09 cm H2O/sec, and a partial respiratory independence was achieved (nocturnal pressure support ventilation was provided) [4]. After four weeks, MIP was 50 cm H2O; see Figure 1. By that time, the load employed with the power breath device was 15 cm H2O. He progressed to decannulation and was maintained on nocturnal noninvasive ventilation to avoid hypoventilation and carbonarcosis. By the time of hospital discharge, he was under IMT twice a day with a load of 17 cm H2O and walking 380 m independently, but under supervision, and climbing a flight of stairs. His MRC score was 52 (see Table 1) and the motor FIM score was 81 (see Table 2). After 6 months of hospital discharge, the patient remains on a regular use of the inspiratory load device and continues to improve his muscle strength. He is now gradually coming back to his daily activities.

3. Discussion

We are reporting a case of body inclusion myositis in which the definite diagnosis was obtained early in the course of the disease. Following previous recommendations [1, 35], therapy was promptly started with intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids; the maintenance drug chosen was azathioprine. The experience with the treatment of this entity has been disappointing [1, 4, 5]. Unsuccessful weaning represents a major obstacle to patient recovery and is associated with a high rate of respiratory infection and a fatal outcome [24, 14]. Although effective in the management of the subjacent process that precipitated the disorder, immunosuppressive agents conceivably do not have any direct action upon the recovery of muscle function. It is plausible that the long period required for recovery of muscle strength may play a role in the weaning failure, emergency of infections, and the dismal prognosis of the disorder. Therefore, the use of a respiratory muscle training program could have a favourable impact on the outcome of the disease [9, 15, 16]. Indeed, the use of inspiratory muscle training has been found to be helpful in a variety of scenarios in which the mechanical ventilation weaning is troublesome [15, 17, 18].

We resorted to an isokinetic electronic load device using a protocol of endurance gain (higher number of repetitions using submaximal loads) given that the respiratory muscles display a large number of type I fibres, which are resistant to fatigue [9, 15, 16]. During the IMT program the patient showed no respiratory or hemodynamic changes that would prevent its continuation. The combination of the two strategies, one addressing the treatment of the acute immunological pathway and the other the recovery of muscle function, was associated with a successful weaning from mechanical ventilation, hospital discharge, and return to daily activities.

It is our view that the appropriate cleaning of the artificial airway, the correct positioning of the patient, and his collaboration were all essential to the success of the muscle training intervention.

In conclusion, the use of an inspiratory load device in association with the conventional therapy with immunosuppressive agents in the reported case was associated with an increase in the strength of the inspiratory muscles resulting in a favourable outcome. This is in line with previous reports above mentioned [15], but further studies are necessary to establish the exact role of IMT in the process of weaning from the ventilator these patients.

Conflict of Interests

Leonardo Cordeiro de Souza, Josué Felipe Campos, Leandro Possidente Daher, Priscila Furtado, Alex Ventura, Pollyana Zamborlini do Prado, Daniele Brasil, Debora Mendonça and Jocemir Ronaldo Lugon state that they do not have any potential conflict of interests to disclose.

Authors’ Contribution

Leonardo Cordeiro de Souza and Jocemir Ronaldo Lugon equally contributed to the design and paper preparation. Josué Felipe Campos, Leandro Possidente Daher, Priscila Furtado, Alex Ventura, Pollyana Zamborlini do Prado, Daniele Brasil, and Debora Mendonça helped regarding the patient care and the case report.


The authors are thankful to the respiratory physiotherapists (especially to Clarine Mendes, Erika Cristine Cordeiro, Monica Lourenço, Leandro Daher, Wanderlei Augusto Junior, Priscila Furtado, and Josué Felipe Campos) and physicians of the intensive care unit of the Hospital and Clínica São Gonçalo for their collaboration to our study.


  1. R. C. Griggs, V. Askanas, S. DiMauro et al., “Inclusion body myositis and myopathies,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 705–713, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. W. Teener and E. C. Raps, “Evaluation and treatment of respiratory failure in neuromuscular disease,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 277–292, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. I. Marie, P. Hatron, E. Hachulla, B. Wallaert, U. Michon-Pasturel, and B. Devulder, “Pulmonary involvement in polymyositis and in dermatomyositis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1336–1343, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A. Selva-O'Callaghan, L. Sanchez-Sitjes, X. Muñoz-Gall et al., “Respiratory failure due to muscle weakness in inflammatory myopathies: maintenance therapy with home mechanical ventilation,” Rheumatology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 914–916, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Cohen, S. Lipper, and D. R. Dantzker, “Inclusion body myositis as a cause of respiratory failure,” Chest, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 975–977, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Medical Research Council, Aids to the Investigation of Peripheral Nerve Injuries. War Memorandum, HMSO, London, UK, 2nd edition, 1943.
  7. C. V. Granger, B. B. Hamilton, J. M. Linacre, A. W. Heinemann, and B. D. Wright, “Performance profiles of the functional independence measure,” The American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 84–89, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Linacre, A. W. Heinemann, B. D. Wright, C. V. Granger, and B. B. Hamilton, “The structure and stability of the functional independence measure,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 127–132, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. R. Kulkarni, E. Fletcher, A. K. McConnell, K. R. Poskitt, and M. R. Whyman, “Pre-operative inspiratory muscle training preserves postoperative inspiratory muscle strength following major abdominal surgery—a randomised pilot study,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 700–705, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. C. de Souza, C. T. da Silva Jr., and J. R. Lugon, “Evaluation of the inspiratory pressure using a digital vacuometer in mechanically ventilated patients: analysis of the time to achieve the inspiratory peak,” Respiratory Care, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 257–262, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. C. de Souza, C. T. da Silva Jr., J. R. Almeida, and J. R. Lugon, “Comparison of Maximal inspiratory pressure, tracheal airway occlusion pressure, and its ratio in the prediction of weaning outcome: impact of the use of a digital vacuometer and the unidirectional valve,” Respiratory Care, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1285–1290, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. C. de Souza, F. S. Guimarães, and J. R. Lugon, “Evaluation of a new index of mechanical ventilation weaning: the timed inspiratory effort,” Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. J. Engel, D. M. Needham, P. E. Morris, and M. A. Gropper, “ICU early mobilization: from recommendation to implementation at three medical centers,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 41, no. 9, supplement 1, pp. S69–S80, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J.-M. Boles, J. Bion, A. Connors et al., “Weaning from mechanical ventilation,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1033–1056, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. D. Martin, B. K. Smith, P. D. Davenport et al., “Inspiratory muscle strength training improves weaning outcome in failure to wean patients: a randomized trial,” Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 2, article R84, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. M. Bissett, I. A. Leditschke, J. D. Paratz, and R. J. Boots, “Protocol: Inspiratory muscle training for promoting recovery and outcomes in ventilated patients (IMPROVe): a randomised controlled trial,” BMJ Open, vol. 2, no. 2, Article ID e000813, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Moodie, J. Reeve, and M. Elkins, “Inspiratory muscle training increases inspiratory muscle strength in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation: a systematic review,” Journal of Physiotherapy, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 213–220, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. P. Cahalin, R. Arena, M. Guazzi et al., “Inspiratory muscle training in heart disease and heart failure: a review of the literature with a focus on method of training and outcomes,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 161–177, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Leonardo Cordeiro de Souza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1651 Views | 517 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.