Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Dentistry
Volume 2014, Article ID 341752, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/341752
Case Report

Impact of Orthodontic Decompensation on Bone Insertion

1University of Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, Brazil
2Graduation and Post-Graduation Program, University of Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, Brazil
3Bauru School of Dentistry and Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
4Graduation and Post-Graduation Program, University of Sagrado Coração (USC) and Branemark Institute, Bauru, SP, Brazil
5São Leopoldo Mandic College, Campinas, SP, Brazil

Received 10 July 2014; Accepted 22 September 2014; Published 10 November 2014

Academic Editor: Gianmario Schierano

Copyright © 2014 Fabio Pinto Guedes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. S. Handelman, “The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 95–110, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Lund, K. Gröndahl, and H.-G. Gröndahl, “Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 466–473, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Lund, K. Gröndahl, K. Hansen, and H.-G. Gröndahl, “Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a prospective study using cone beam CT,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 480–487, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Makedonas, H. Lund, K. Gröndahl, and K. Hansen, “Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance and the relation to risk factors,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 196–201, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Leite, A. C. Conti, R. Navarro, M. Almeida, P. Oltramari-Navarro, and R. Almeida, “Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets using cone beam computed tomography,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1078–1082, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. C. Ferreira, D. G. Garib, and F. Cotrim-Ferreira, “Method standardization of buccal and palatal arch bone plate measurement using cone beam computed tomography,” Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49.e1–49.e7, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Kim, J. U. Park, and Y.-A. Kook, “Alveolar bone loss around incisors in surgical skeletal class iii patients a retrospective 3-d cbct study,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 676–682, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. A. W. Fuhrmann, A. Bücker, and P. R. Diedrich, “Assessment of alveolar bone loss with high resolution computed tomography,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 258–263, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Gracco, L. Lombardo, G. Mancuso, V. Gravina, and G. Siciliani, “Upper incisor position and bony support in untreated patients as seen on CBCT,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 692–702, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Yamada, N. Kitai, N. Kakimoto, S. Murakami, S. Furukawa, and K. Takada, “Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 766–772, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. C. Leung, L. Palomo, R. Griffith, and M. G. Hans, “Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. S109–S119, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K.-M. Lee, Y.-I. Kim, S.-B. Park, and W.-S. Son, “Alveolar bone loss around lower incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment in mandibular prognathism,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 637–644, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Enhos, T. Uysal, A. Yagci, I. Velid, F. I. Ucare, and T. Ozerf, “Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 868–874, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. G. Garib, M. S. Yatabe, T. O. Ozawa, and O. G. da Silva Filho, “Alveolar bone morphology under the perspective of the computed tomography: defining the biological limits of tooth movement,” Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 192–205, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Dogan, “Skeletal and dental changes after orthognathic surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism,” The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. R. Proffit and R. P. White Jr., “Who needs surgical-orthodontic treatment?” The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics & Orthognathic Surgery, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. M. Wolford, S. C. Karras, and P. Mehra, “Considerations for orthognathic surgery during growth, part 2: Maxillary deformities,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 102–105, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Capelozza Filho, A. Martins, R. Mazzotini, and O. G. da Silva Filho, “Effects of dental decompensation on the surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism,” The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165–180, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. R. Proffit, T. A. Turvey, and C. Phillips, “Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability.,” The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 191–204, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Sarikaya, B. Haydar, S. Ciger, and M. Ariyürek, “Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth,” The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. G. Steiner, J. K. Pearson, and J. Ainamo, “Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 314–320, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. L. Wennström, J. Lindhe, F. Sinclair, and B. Thilander, “Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 121–129, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. D. Molen, “Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements,” The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. S130–S135, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus