Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Dentistry
Volume 2014, Article ID 382367, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/382367
Case Report

Camouflage of Severe Skeletal Class II Gummy Smile Patient Treated Nonsurgically with Mini Implants

1Orthodontic Department, Baqai Medical University, Karachi 74600, Pakistan
2Orthodontic Unit, School of Dental Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, 16150 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
3Dow University of Health Science, Karachi, Pakistan

Received 14 August 2014; Accepted 28 October 2014; Published 7 December 2014

Academic Editor: Pelin Guneri

Copyright © 2014 Irfan Qamruddin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. B. Ackerman, Enhancement Orthodontics: Theory and Practice, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.
  2. J. A. McNamara Jr., “Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 177–202, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Y. C. Wu, U. Hägg, H. Pancherz, R. W. K. Wong, and C. McGrath, “Sagittal and vertical occlusal cephalometric analyses of Pancherz: norms for Chinese children,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 816–824, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. D. Singh, J. A. McNamara Jr., and S. Lozanoff, “Craniofacial heterogeneity of prepubertal Korean and European-American subjects with Class III malocclusions: procrustes, EDMA, and cephalometric analyses,” The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 227–240, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. H. Hassan, “Cephalometric norms for Saudi adults living in the Western region of Saudi Arabia,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 109–113, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Fida, “Pattern of malocclusion in orthodontic patients: a hospital based study,” Journal of Ayub Medical College, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Upadhyay, S. Yadav, K. Nagaraj, and R. Nanda, “Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in class II division 1 patients,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 240–247, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. Hunt, C. Johnston, P. Hepper, D. Burden, and M. Stevenson, “The influence of maxillary gingival exposure on dental attractiveness ratings,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 199–204, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T.-W. Kim and B. V. Freitas, “Orthodontic treatment of gummy smile by using mini-implants (Part I): treatment of vertical growth of upper anterior dentoalveolar complex,” Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 42–43, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Simon, A. Rosenblatt, and W. Dorfman, “Eliminating a gummy smile with surgical lip repositioning,” The Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 1, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. Y.-J. Chen, H.-H. Chang, C.-Y. Huang, H.-C. Hung, E. H.-H. Lai, and C.-C. J. Yao, “A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 768–775, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. T. Mattos, A. C. de Oliveira Ruellas, and C. N. Elias, “Is it possible to re-use mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage? Results of an in vitro study,” Materials Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 521–525, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. C. Ngeow, S. T. Ong, K. K. Siow, and C. B. Lian, “Orthognathic surgery in the University of Malaya,” Medical Journal of Malaysia, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 398–403, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. B. Farrell and M. R. Tucker, “Safe, efficient, and cost-effective orthognathic surgery in the outpatient setting,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 2064–2071, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. A. Mihalik, W. R. Proffit, and C. Phillips, “Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 266–278, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. E. Bishara, D. M. Cummins, J. R. Jakobsen, and A. R. Zaher, “Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in class II, Division 1 cases treated with and without extractions,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Upadhyay, S. Yadav, and R. Nanda, “Vertical-dimension control during en-masse retraction with mini-implant anchorage,” The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 96–108, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. J. Burstone, “The mechanics of the segmented arch techniques,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 99–120, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Shroff, W. M. Yoon, S. J. Lindauer, and C. J. Burstone, “Simultaneous intrusion and retraction using a three-piece base arch,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 455–461, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus